Unorthodox changes to Cildania's cultural status

Threads from before the Dec 15, 2023 migration.

Re: Unorthodox changes to Cildania's cultural status

Postby Zanz » Thu Dec 13, 2018 8:10 pm

Luis1p wrote:Hey everyone,

To clear things up from my point of view. Mr.God did speak to us about him changing Cildania's cultural protocols. However, I did not know that he put them into effect without posting on the forums or without a public consultation.

That being said, Mr.God should have posted that bill to the forums for a 48 hour "consultation" period. Mr.God has said that he was wrong and I thank him for doing that. Just to reiterate, moderation is not "above" or "superior" to ordinary players. Mods have to abide by the rules even though we are in fact-- mods.

The "volunteer" argument is not valid in this case in my opinion. This was just a mistake by a mod that should not and will not happen again in the future. I appreciate that you've all taken the time to point this out. Moderation is taking steps to make sure we increase communication between ourselves in order to make sure your experience in the game is exceptional.

I hope this answers your questions and issues with the moderation team.

Thanks.


Thank you for this response.
Just a bunch of shit.
User avatar
Zanz
 
Posts: 1488
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 4:13 pm

Re: Unorthodox changes to Cildania's cultural status

Postby Aquinas » Sat Dec 15, 2018 4:17 pm

Before conclusions start being drawn from this, it would probably only be fair to offer Moderation another opportunity to explain the discrepancies between the account given by Luis and the account given by Mr.God.

Mr.God says he asked the other Mods to approve his CP proposal over Discord, and seems to imply that they did so. Luis says the CP proposal was discussed in that conversation but that final approval was neither sought nor given.
User avatar
Aquinas
 
Posts: 9796
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 1:28 am
Location: UK

Re: Unorthodox changes to Cildania's cultural status

Postby Aquinas » Tue Mar 19, 2019 4:07 pm

Image

http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=596199
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=596201
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=593341

...here we go again.

Auditorii, who is practically a Moderator now, has used his active second account to install a Cultural Protocol in Pontesi without bothering to propose it for scrutiny and approval on the forum like everybody else has to.

FWIW, if given the opportunity, I would have made the case for a greater representation of Indian/Rajutti culture in order to reflect the Indian RP myself and others have done there. Even if it was only 10% or something, that would have been nice.
User avatar
Aquinas
 
Posts: 9796
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 1:28 am
Location: UK

Re: Unorthodox changes to Cildania's cultural status

Postby Aquinas » Wed Mar 20, 2019 2:13 pm

Could Moderation please clarify Pontesi's current cultural status?

Also, Auditorii has now inactivated in Pontesi and left his mess behind for others to sort out, just like he did during the Kafuristan RP law saga.

With respect, it's not smart to allow people to run second accounts who make a habit of doing this sort of nonsense. All it ultimately does is multiply their capacity to inflict hassle and confusion on everybody else.
User avatar
Aquinas
 
Posts: 9796
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 1:28 am
Location: UK

Re: Unorthodox changes to Cildania's cultural status

Postby Auditorii » Wed Mar 20, 2019 2:32 pm

1. I’m back in Kafuristan, so problem solved.

2. I will delete those bills in Pontesi so it’s easier for everyone.
Image Dorvik | Image Zardugal | Image Ostland (FBC)
Moderator
-- Particracy Game Rules
-- Moderation Requests
-- Game Information
-- Particracy Discord
Auditorii
 
Posts: 6279
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 2:51 am

Re: Unorthodox changes to Cildania's cultural status

Postby Auditorii » Wed Mar 20, 2019 6:59 pm

Aquinas wrote:Image

http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=596199
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=596201
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=593341

...here we go again.

Auditorii, who is practically a Moderator now, has used his active second account to install a Cultural Protocol in Pontesi without bothering to propose it for scrutiny and approval on the forum like everybody else has to.

FWIW, if given the opportunity, I would have made the case for a greater representation of Indian/Rajutti culture in order to reflect the Indian RP myself and others have done there. Even if it was only 10% or something, that would have been nice.


And for the record, I am not a Moderator. Please do not attempt to falsely personify my position. Thank you.
Image Dorvik | Image Zardugal | Image Ostland (FBC)
Moderator
-- Particracy Game Rules
-- Moderation Requests
-- Game Information
-- Particracy Discord
Auditorii
 
Posts: 6279
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 2:51 am

Previous

Return to Archive

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests