Please hear me out what I will say, and answer if you can to what I ask.
It all started when me, the Rightful Radical Party (http://classic.particracy.net/viewparty ... rtyid=8475), and my main character, Vojislav Krkljus, decided to go to a formal visit to Lodamun. There, some problems began, because there are two PARTIES that don't want me there. BUT, that is all dandy and fine, what can I do, that is how they are. But one of them, the United Republics Party (http://classic.particracy.net/viewparty ... tyid=11631) posted a few posts (to which you'll find links below) regarding their hereditary leader, "Divine Majesty Matt Diggory" not wanting my "Vojislav Krkljus" there.
viewtopic.php?f=16&t=1768 - Third post from below (there are multiple instances of this post: here, in the Lodamun paper and in the Telamon paper, but they are all the same)
http://classic.particracy.net/viewnatio ... ationid=19 - There is multiple mentioning of their hereditary leader in the messages of the Lodamese Union country page (I found this link by logging into my old inactive party in Lodamun)
I explained to him that it is all OK to literally hate me if he wants, and use one of his ministers (or party officials) for announcing this, but that he cannot speak for the hereditary leader, because neither is he his party member nor any hereditary leader should favor a party and let them speak trough him. That is literally RPing another ones character (even though this character isn't anyones). This was all said to him. His reply was:
From my messages: He is my character and I can RP him however I like. You may complain to the mods, but it will not affect how I RP my character in my country.
After investigating a little I found out that he maybe had part in thinking up the name of the hereditary leader, so hence forth him thinking of the hereditary leader as "his character". I have a long and rich experience of RPing in Particracy and this never was allowed, neither is this logic. Why are there any presidential elections if this is allowed? Why don't we just say the hereditary leader is ours and decide what he likes of dislikes, what he thinks and doesn't think, which country he likes which not, ... It just doesn't go that way.
Am I right on this?
If so, could you [the Mods] try to explain this to him. It would be gladly appreciated.