Alright, I cannot prove, whether these three or even four accounts are controlled by the same person, but I have found a number of oddities, which made me suspicious. Fact is that the game in Darnussia has been no longer fun to play because of the peculiar behaviour of the following parties. I would very much fathom an inquiry.
Parties & Users in question:
(Eiserne Faust des Allmächtigen) user:
http://classic.particracy.net/viewuser.php?userid=25910(Narik Nationalistische Partij) user:http://classic.particracy.net/viewuser.php?userid=37161
(Social-Centre Party) user:
http://classic.particracy.net/viewuser.php?userid=37357(National Conservatives) user:
http://classic.particracy.net/viewuser.php?userid=37422Points of inquiry:
1) The Social Centre Party always votes in favour of our bills (e.g.
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=603043). The party is centrist, but has no problem always backing anything we try. This bill was an experiment where we proposed extremist new laws (some of which even against their ideology), and yet they voted in favour. I suspect the intent of vote-splitting. This party always backs constitutional proposals from the Eiserne Faust des Allmächtigen.
2) All the parties in question supported
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=602502, which granted a RP law (with questionable game-rules legality) that clearly benefits the Eiserne Faust des Allmächtigen. Do not get me wrong, other parties do vote differently depending on their ideologies, but whenever EFdA proposes changes to the constitution or needs help, other parties suspiciously cooperate.
3) I was watching the parties, whilst they were online and found out that on multiple occasions, immediately after one of the parties went off-line another of them went online
4) If there are two parties with similar ideologies, they often get more votes together than if a party would stand alone. It seems like the National Conservatives, who mostly vote with EFdA wish to acheive just that. Note that the NC party always supports EFdA proposals.
5) Both the NNP, SCP and NC have oddly short description, but their style of writing is very similar. Excellent example:
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=602818. But note that whilst the SCP seems to use a different writing style - it is writing in the same register and grammar as all the previous ones.
Either somebody has invited his
friends to manipulate the game or he is
acting alone to manipulate outcomes. This kind of behaviour makes this game less fun and I would be more than thankful for a fair investigation.