Page 1 of 20

Requests: Treaty Clearouts [M]

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 7:04 pm
by Moderation
4. Rules Concerning Game Mechanics (ie.Bills, Treaties etc.)

d. Treaties will be eligible for deletion if they are more than 50 in-game years old, and have no ratifications. These should be reported to Moderation on the Treaty Clearout Request Thread.

e. “Treaty-locking", or ratifying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed.

Re: Dead Treaties

PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 9:51 pm
by federalist11
http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=2018

This treaty has been replicated and was a prototype of the MU treaty currently in place. As the author of the treaty, requesting deletion to avoid confusion.

Re: Dead Treaties

PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 10:38 pm
by Xander
Done

Re: Dead Treaties

PostPosted: Sat Jan 28, 2012 11:30 pm
by zlopado
http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=2122

It is Cobura-specific and did not even gain a simple majority, so I do not think we need it anymore.

Thank you! :)

Re: Dead Treaties

PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:22 pm
by Reiko
Done.

Re: Dead Treaties

PostPosted: Tue Apr 03, 2012 9:03 pm
by Farsun
Double treaty due to a misunderstanding, please delete.

http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=2169

Thank you.

Re: Dead Treaties

PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2012 1:52 am
by Urien
Done

Re: Dead Treaties

PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 1:49 pm
by Siggon Kristov

Re: Dead Treaties

PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 4:47 pm
by Valdštejn



That treaty is ratified by Dorvik. If you have a good explanation why it should be deleted, please explain.
If this was meant to be a joke, don't do it again.

Re: Dead Treaties

PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 4:56 pm
by Siggon Kristov
Beluzia and Dorvik were the only 2 countries in the AU when Beluzia ratified the treaty.
The AU is a puppet organization, by the Dorvish Conservative Party, to guarantee the popularity of the controlling player.

Beluzia withdrew recently, when the Dorvish player showed obviously no interest in Beluzia, and seemed to only use it's alleged care for Artania as an excuse to impose aggressive foreign policies.

The treaty is only recognized by a minority party in Dorvik. It has hasn't had any success in uniting Artania, and it doesn't serve its alleged purpose of bringing Artanian nations together.

There are no efforts to maintain the alliance; despite being the only other member (before we quit), we were not contacted, and nothing was said about nominating an official to lead the Artanian Union. The treaty is a fraud.

Here is a bill debate for extra reference to the relations between Dorvik and its "AU partner"
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=344849

I will contact Moderation privately to address other details, relating to OOC communication between the Dorvik player and myself.