Treaty Clearout Requests

In-Game and Forum requests and complaints.

Re: Dead Treaties

Postby Aquinas » Mon Sep 14, 2015 6:36 pm

Done.
Aquinas
 
Posts: 8431
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 1:28 am
Location: UK

Re: Dead Treaties

Postby Luxis » Sun Sep 20, 2015 9:18 pm

Alliance Res Public (Mordusia) - Inactive
United Katub Reformers (Beiteynu) - Active
Luxis
 
Posts: 171
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:05 pm
Location: USA/Mordusia

Re: Dead Treaties

Postby Aquinas » Sun Sep 20, 2015 9:21 pm

Thanks for doing that, but next time it's best to wait for the treaties to be properly dead before posting them here. Helps to keep the threads clearer :).
Aquinas
 
Posts: 8431
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 1:28 am
Location: UK

Re: Dead Treaties

Postby Lucca » Mon Sep 21, 2015 7:00 pm

Luxis wrote:http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreaty.php?treatyid=2186

Regardless of whether it has any current ratifying nations or not, the first one in that list (number 2186), has an active party as its author -- please don't delete it :(

(Unless its author subsequently requests such, that is.)



Aquinas wrote:I have followed a procedure, which I believe to be correct and which Lucca appears to agree with, of deleting only those Treaties where:

i. The Treaty is not currently ratified by any nation or in the active/recent process of being ratified by a nation.

ii. The in-game user account of the Treaty's author/drafter is inactive.

Thank you very much! :)
Lucca
 
Posts: 172
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Ihmetellä, Republic of Kirlawa

Re: Dead Treaties

Postby Aquinas » Mon Sep 21, 2015 7:24 pm

As you say, Lucca, treaties created by parties which are still active should not generally be deleted.
Aquinas
 
Posts: 8431
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 1:28 am
Location: UK

Re: Dead Treaties

Postby Doc » Mon Jan 18, 2016 4:14 pm

http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=3237

Please delete, as it went to ratification too soon, and a nearly identical one was created so we could continue to work out the terms of the treaty.
Primary: Socialist Party of Kalistan (SPoK), Old School Since 2591

Inactive: Parti des Frères Lourenne, Since 4109
User avatar
Doc
 
Posts: 792
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:29 pm
Location: Primary: Kalistan/ Socialist Party of Kalistan (SPoK); Inactive in Lourenne and Telamon

Re: Dead Treaties

Postby Aquinas » Mon Jan 18, 2016 4:52 pm

Done.
Aquinas
 
Posts: 8431
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 1:28 am
Location: UK

Re: Dead Treaties

Postby jamescfm » Mon Aug 29, 2016 11:22 am

Can I request deletion of this: http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=3421

0 Ratifiers and 0 Pending and both concerned nations appear to have rejected it. Although it isn't more than 20 IG years old, I am the author so could this be overlooked?
User avatar
jamescfm
 
Posts: 1830
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 3:41 pm
Location: Up In The Sky

Re: Dead Treaties

Postby Aquinas » Mon Aug 29, 2016 3:39 pm

jamescfm wrote:Can I request deletion of this: http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=3421

0 Ratifiers and 0 Pending and both concerned nations appear to have rejected it. Although it isn't more than 20 IG years old, I am the author so could this be overlooked?


Done.
Aquinas
 
Posts: 8431
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 1:28 am
Location: UK

Re: Dead Treaties

Postby jamescfm » Mon Oct 03, 2016 7:46 pm

I know I asked you to break protocol last time but I'm going to do it again :shock:

http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreat ... atyid=3438

I think it's pretty obvious that this treaty is serving no function and should be deleted. I have contacted the author but received no response yet.
User avatar
jamescfm
 
Posts: 1830
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 3:41 pm
Location: Up In The Sky

PreviousNext

Return to Game Moderation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests