Requests: Inactivations [M]

[DueWizard70]

http://classic.particracy.net/viewparty ... tyid=41470

Hasn't logged in in 3 days, no voting, no updated description, no updated name.

[jamescfm]

Done.

[Augustus Germanus]

http://classic.particracy.net/viewuser.php?userid=41304
Has not logged in for 3 days, no activity almost whatsoever, not even updating party name, color or description and not voting on any bills.

http://classic.particracy.net/viewuser.php?userid=41228
Logs on every other day but hasn't done anything, not voted on any bills and created an early election bill (I think it is over a week ago or maybe longer) without proceeding to issue it for a vote. This has been occurring ever since their creation on the 13th November.

[Auditorii]

The first one qualifies for the 2 day, no changes rule. The second however has to reach 4 days. I’ll keep an eye on it though.

[Augustus Germanus]

The first one qualifies for the 2 day, no changes rule. The second however has to reach 4 days. I’ll keep an eye on it though.

I understand but don't they qualify with this section of the rules:

-- 3b. They are "Party Sitting" which means that they log on, do not vote on bills in order to avoid being activated by automatic sweeps or by reporting, inactivation will only happen when this behavior has been on-going for 4 or more days;

They haven't been "party sitting" for 4 days but rather 14 days. In any case thank you.

[Auditorii]

The first one qualifies for the 2 day, no changes rule. The second however has to reach 4 days. I’ll keep an eye on it though.

I understand but don't they qualify with this section of the rules:

-- 3b. They are "Party Sitting" which means that they log on, do not vote on bills in order to avoid being activated by automatic sweeps or by reporting, inactivation will only happen when this behavior has been on-going for 4 or more days;

They haven't been "party sitting" for 4 days but rather 14 days. In any case thank you.

I’ll take a look.

[Augustus Germanus]

The first one qualifies for the 2 day, no changes rule. The second however has to reach 4 days. I’ll keep an eye on it though.

I understand but don't they qualify with this section of the rules:

-- 3b. They are "Party Sitting" which means that they log on, do not vote on bills in order to avoid being activated by automatic sweeps or by reporting, inactivation will only happen when this behavior has been on-going for 4 or more days;

They haven't been "party sitting" for 4 days but rather 14 days. In any case thank you.

I’ll take a look.

Thanks

[robmark0000]

http://classic.particracy.net/viewuser.php?userid=40956

-- 3a. They have not logged in for 2 days (48 hours) and have not updated their party description or their party name or their party color or have not voted on any bills currently active for voting;

Last login from the party: 14:07:27, November 28, 2020 CET
Current time: 14:10:57, November 30, 2020 CET

We have no many bills, they didn't voted on the last passed one:
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=635685

And they (of course yet) not voted on the current bill under voting:
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=635803

Also the party really close to 'party sitting', just login and propose nothing, but sometimes vote on the bills, sometimes not. Even if you won't inactivate the party, please keep an eye on it.

[jamescfm]

Not eligible for inactivation because they have updated their party name, description and colour. Party sitting is more than just missing a single bill and it shouldn't just be used to try and inactivate parties earlier than usual.

[robmark0000]

Not eligible for inactivation because they have updated their party name, description and colour. Party sitting is more than just missing a single bill and it shouldn't just be used to try and inactivate parties earlier than usual.

"Even if you won't inactivate the party, please keep an eye on it."