In Mikuni-Hulstria, there is a lot of debate about a lot of houses claiming some stuff.
I. Perhaps the most RP debated and controversial issue, but the less controversial in terms of game mechanics, the Rothingren-Traugotts' claim on the Throne of Mikuni-Hulstria. There should be no problem with that, because the Rothingren-Traugotts used to hold what used to be known as Greater Hulstria only a century ago.
II. Another claim (but nobody cares about it), is my claim over the lands of Beluzia and Rutania. In fact, I've been roleplaying as the House that formerly ruled over the island of Bailon, and once held the lands of Beluzia under personal union. However, this house was purely invented by Beluz players when Beluzia was seeking to join the Culturally Protected nations.
III. Finally, a claim accepted by all players but probably the most controversial in terms of game mechanics, is the Claim made by the Imperial House (Yukio-Labsburg) on Mikuni's former territories, including our former colonies that had been set free.
So, from a moderator's point of view, which ones are legitimate and which ones aren't?