Particracy Forum

Polites wrote:

House Spencer wrote:http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=577419

Jelbania opts out

Denied. We might have been inclined to approve this under different circumstances, but not in the present case.

I agree that Jelbania should not be removed from the RP-Index. But that is because the party is no longer active. I see nothing in the rules that gives Moderation the discretion to deny (or for that matter accept) an opt-out. The rules simply state that nations can opt out. Therefore if Moderation wants a say in the matter, the rules should be amended accordingly. Personally, I strongly believe that opting out should be in the sole discretion of the players in the nation.

Regards,
Occam

Occam wrote:

Polites wrote:

House Spencer wrote:http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=577419

Jelbania opts out

Denied. We might have been inclined to approve this under different circumstances, but not in the present case.

I agree that Jelbania should not be removed from the RP-Index. But that is because the party is no longer active. I see nothing in the rules that gives Moderation the discretion to deny (or for that matter accept) an opt-out. The rules simply state that nations can opt out. Therefore if Moderation wants a say in the matter, the rules should be amended accordingly. Personally, I strongly believe that opting out should be in the sole discretion of the players in the nation.

Regards,
Occam

Good point, we are currently looking into a way to amend the rules and bring more clarity to the RP Accord.

Polites wrote:

House Spencer wrote:http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=577419

Jelbania opts out

Denied. We might have been inclined to approve this under different circumstances, but not in the present case.

WHY?

To avoid any confusion over its status, I'm opting Jelbania back into the Global RP Accord, see here

http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=588057

Pontesi has voted to opt back into the accord.

Accepted