Particracy Forum

Maxington wrote:Hi, is it possible to use an RP Law to ban militias and impose restrictions on firearms use?

Aquinas wrote:http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=592478



http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=592191

The player in Deltaria is using an OOC RP law reference bill in order to misinform players that their party name has to be "in Czech as the CP states".

This specification is not even mentioned in the linked RP law itself. It is not clear as to whether this would be allowed anyway, because players are meant to be able to list their party names in English.

thefalloutfan101 wrote:Just wondering if I have achieved appropriate RP justification for my blanket ban of several parties, found here: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=592826

I have crafted over two weeks of justification for said law via rp posts, found here in Dundorf's news thread, which continues onto the next page: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=6725&start=460#p145410

Thanks.

thefalloutfan101 wrote:Just wondering if I have achieved appropriate RP justification for my blanket ban of several parties, found here: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=592826

I have crafted over two weeks of justification for said law via rp posts, found here in Dundorf's news thread, which continues onto the next page: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=6725&start=460#p145410

Thanks.

5d. RP laws that grant extraordinary powers, ban specific parties or ideologies, create one-party states, grant or allow powers that might not be granted by normal game mechanics or otherwise authorize dictatorial or executive authority must be posted HERE for review by Moderation and the Global Roleplay Committee. Please note that RP law approvals may take sometime and Moderation and the GRC will respond as promptly as possible;

Aquinas wrote:http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=592798

The RP law above, which was passed after the new rules came in, and is referenced in Kafuristan's RP laws reference bill, has not been submitted to this thread for review, as per the new Game Rules:

5d. RP laws that grant extraordinary powers, ban specific parties or ideologies, create one-party states, grant or allow powers that might not be granted by normal game mechanics or otherwise authorize dictatorial or executive authority must be posted HERE for review by Moderation and the Global Roleplay Committee. Please note that RP law approvals may take sometime and Moderation and the GRC will respond as promptly as possible;

As can be seen from the bill discussion, the other player in Kafuristan questioned whether this RP law was legitimate under the rules, which makes it seem all the more unusual that Auditorii did not submit it to this thread, as the rules require.

Auditorii wrote:

Aquinas wrote:http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=592798

The RP law above, which was passed after the new rules came in, and is referenced in Kafuristan's RP laws reference bill, has not been submitted to this thread for review, as per the new Game Rules:

5d. RP laws that grant extraordinary powers, ban specific parties or ideologies, create one-party states, grant or allow powers that might not be granted by normal game mechanics or otherwise authorize dictatorial or executive authority must be posted HERE for review by Moderation and the Global Roleplay Committee. Please note that RP law approvals may take sometime and Moderation and the GRC will respond as promptly as possible;

As can be seen from the bill discussion, the other player in Kafuristan questioned whether this RP law was legitimate under the rules, which makes it seem all the more unusual that Auditorii did not submit it to this thread, as the rules require.

I appreciate you’re vigilante patrolling of the game. Truth be told, I’ve been overly busy and I never posted it. Simple facts of IRL

But since you’ve included the link. I’ll ask for my fellow GRC members to review and approve.