Page 22 of 61

Re: RP Law Query Thread

PostPosted: Sat Mar 23, 2019 2:59 am
by terminallyGrumpy
Regarding my last message, it was my mistake not to show RP justification. Here it is:

viewtopic.php?f=17&t=353&start=1840#p147767
This news article shows the radical takeover of my party in Dorvik, leading to, obviously, radical reforms.

viewtopic.php?f=17&t=353&start=1840#p147796
This news article explains the exile of the Dorvish Republican military, leaving a possible void of power in Dorvik leading to more justification as to why this bill would be proposed.

viewtopic.php?f=17&t=353&start=1840#p147797
This other news article, as posted before, explains more into detail the bill itself.

Although RP regarding internal Dorvish politics will continue to come, I believe these three articles are sufficient to justify the implementation of a law like this. I will post the bill itself once more, in case my case is considered once again.

http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=596676

Re: RP Law Query Thread

PostPosted: Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:02 am
by Auditorii
terminallyGrumpy wrote:Regarding my last message, it was my mistake not to show RP justification. Here it is:

viewtopic.php?f=17&t=353&start=1840#p147767
This news article shows the radical takeover of my party in Dorvik, leading to, obviously, radical reforms.

viewtopic.php?f=17&t=353&start=1840#p147796
This news article explains the exile of the Dorvish Republican military, leaving a possible void of power in Dorvik leading to more justification as to why this bill would be proposed.

viewtopic.php?f=17&t=353&start=1840#p147797
This other news article, as posted before, explains more into detail the bill itself.

Although RP regarding internal Dorvish politics will continue to come, I believe these three articles are sufficient to justify the implementation of a law like this. I will post the bill itself once more, in case my case is considered once again.

http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=596676


As previously stated, we reviewed and have come to the conclusion that more justification is needed. We appreciate you posting your links but again, we believe more is necessary. Thank you.

Re: RP Law Query Thread

PostPosted: Tue Apr 02, 2019 7:50 pm
by SheikhOlorin
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7533&p=147951&hilit=jakania#p147951
This new article is where the character of Sevinç Namoğlu is developed and where her movement (the Motherland Protection Front) is presented as a terrorist organization.

viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7533&p=147954&hilit=jakania#p147954
This article shows the bombing attempt by the terrorist organization MPF and how it's prevented. It can be said that this is the post where MPF is properly recognized as a terrorist organization.

viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7533&p=148236&hilit=Jakania#p148236
Metamorphosis Department puts the Sentinel Act on hold. Meta reason is of course my request not being accepted.

viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7533&p=148286&hilit=Jakania#p148286
Mustafa Altınyol (a prominent member of the MPF) is shot dead by his own "comrades". Meta reason behind this is kind of to present the terrorists as cowards but also to present all right-wing organizations as potentially dangerous. Mustafa Altınyol comes from BBP.

viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7533&p=148355&hilit=Jakania#p148355
This is "the final point" of this arc that's relevant to the Sentinel Act. The Metamorphosis Department is directly blamed for putting the Sentinel Act on hold and allowing this national tragedy to happen. Terrorists behind this action have "lite-wing" backgrounds.

The rest of Sevinç Namoğlu and MPF's arc (that I plan to RP) are not relevant to the Sentinel Act (in a manner that they would be justification for it) assuming that this request is accepted.

Re: RP Law Query Thread

PostPosted: Tue Apr 02, 2019 9:13 pm
by thefalloutfan101
Upon reading the articles, your request for the Sentinel Act to be drafted is hereby approved. While the articles are short, they do however have substance and a clear flow of events. You may now draft the bill before your respective legislature and continue any rp you have related to it.

Re: RP Law Query Thread

PostPosted: Sat Apr 13, 2019 5:14 pm
by XanderOne

Re: RP Law Query Thread

PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2019 2:41 pm
by Govenor12

Re: RP Law Query Thread

PostPosted: Tue Apr 16, 2019 7:48 pm
by Rogue
I will let the GRC head look to both of these

Re: RP Law Query Thread

PostPosted: Tue Apr 16, 2019 7:58 pm
by thefalloutfan101
XanderOne wrote:As per rule 6.5c:

http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=597800
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=597836
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=597877
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=597881

About the justifications, I invite the mods to consider and so read the last articles published on the Corriere d'Istalia starting with this one: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=4118&start=1230#p148365


Greatly apologize for the delay but your bills are hereby approved. Thank you for your patience.

Govenor12 wrote:http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=598641
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=598582

To be approved by moderation

Proof:

viewtopic.php?f=17&t=30&start=500
http://classic.particracy.net/viewnatio ... ationid=50 (various laws and changes made by law)


Approved.

Re: RP Law Query Thread

PostPosted: Thu May 09, 2019 6:45 am
by alaskancrabpuffs21
Up Front I apologize for the Role play law it is REALLY LONG... I have some questions. Can I ban an ideology since it has a violent history in a nation. In my case in Hulstria/Gao-Soto Communism changed tore the country apart for decades. I wasn't even going to enforce this but as a monarchist party it could deter a Communist party from joining. I am attempting to create a Kaiser State where the Kaiser has the power but still not breaking the rules. My model for a country is based in the German Empire before WW2. If you don't want to read over the whole Constitution (I wouldn't blame you) here is a summery. I took the existing constitution and I tweaked it. I gave the Kaiser much more power over the state and I banned Communism and Socialism (I wasn't going to enforce this)... I gave him power to veto certain unconstitutional role play laws, He also become the head of the military. Also real quick can I as a political party control a leader that is frozen (not elected) if I created it??? Can I keep other parties away from this frozen Head of State??? I would like to know this before the inevitable other party joins my country. I'm sorry I am asking too many Q's but I want to keep this within the rules.

Here is my proposed Constitution. (Also I accidentally pushed the voting button so that is why there is an identical bill that is being voted on and of course I voted no since it isn't approved by Moderation.)

Here is the Bill
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=600168

Thank You for your patience
PM me of reply for any more questions

Re: RP Law Query Thread

PostPosted: Fri May 10, 2019 4:46 am
by colonelvesica
alaskancrabpuffs21 wrote:Up Front I apologize for the Role play law it is REALLY LONG... I have some questions. Can I ban an ideology since it has a violent history in a nation. In my case in Hulstria/Gao-Soto Communism changed tore the country apart for decades. I wasn't even going to enforce this but as a monarchist party it could deter a Communist party from joining. I am attempting to create a Kaiser State where the Kaiser has the power but still not breaking the rules. My model for a country is based in the German Empire before WW2. If you don't want to read over the whole Constitution (I wouldn't blame you) here is a summery. I took the existing constitution and I tweaked it. I gave the Kaiser much more power over the state and I banned Communism and Socialism (I wasn't going to enforce this)... I gave him power to veto certain unconstitutional role play laws, He also become the head of the military. Also real quick can I as a political party control a leader that is frozen (not elected) if I created it??? Can I keep other parties away from this frozen Head of State??? I would like to know this before the inevitable other party joins my country. I'm sorry I am asking too many Q's but I want to keep this within the rules.

Here is my proposed Constitution. (Also I accidentally pushed the voting button so that is why there is an identical bill that is being voted on and of course I voted no since it isn't approved by Moderation.)

Here is the Bill
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=600168

Thank You for your patience
PM me of reply for any more questions
I'll read it, review it, and get back to you tonorrow