Mordusia RP Appeal Thread

In-Game and Forum requests and complaints.

Mordusia RP Appeal Thread

Postby FPC » Mon May 07, 2018 10:06 am

...
Particracy Moderation
Wiki Admin and Bureaucrat (for some reason)
User avatar
FPC
 
Posts: 718
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2016 6:14 am
Location: Scotland

Re: Mordusia RP Appeal Thread

Postby The Tea Party » Mon May 07, 2018 10:07 am

Sir, I am here to appeal your judgement as Mordusia has informally consented to RP and it is legitimate.
The Tea Party
 
Posts: 56
Joined: Mon May 22, 2017 8:45 am

Re: Mordusia RP Appeal Thread

Postby FPC » Mon May 07, 2018 10:11 am

If you have any evidence we could consider this. However an informal consent isnt neccesarily appropriate.

But as I say if you could send me evidence that would help. Otherwise we can't really progress much further.
Particracy Moderation
Wiki Admin and Bureaucrat (for some reason)
User avatar
FPC
 
Posts: 718
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2016 6:14 am
Location: Scotland

Re: Mordusia RP Appeal Thread

Postby The Tea Party » Mon May 07, 2018 10:17 am

The RP in question was a war and as part of it; the Saridanese Government made its message clear to Dankuk (controlled by Yolo04) and that any attack on us by them would ultimately result in an attack by us on their allies; Mordusia. Yolo then went to attack one of my camps in Saridan and I made the appropriate response; I attacked Mordusia.

That RP has been reported due to an absence of consent; however acting upon the war is classified as an informal form of consent for which the players in Mordusia clearly did. Many of those players will tell you that because an anti-war Government is in power and wants to improve relations with Saridan, however they have only gone as far as to ask me for my thoughts on the matter and expressed their interest in improving relations; there has been no ceasefire or peace treaty of such, therefore it is in my rights to continue RP-ing battles until an armistice is made- a RL example would be the end of WW1, even though an armistice was signed; many soldiers kept on fighting til’ the last minute.

This is what I base my appeal on and I ask you for reconsideration.
The Tea Party
 
Posts: 56
Joined: Mon May 22, 2017 8:45 am

Re: Mordusia RP Appeal Thread

Postby The Tea Party » Mon May 07, 2018 10:18 am

Any Questions?
The Tea Party
 
Posts: 56
Joined: Mon May 22, 2017 8:45 am

Re: Mordusia RP Appeal Thread

Postby macmckeown » Mon May 07, 2018 10:19 am

The Tea Party wrote:Sir, I am here to appeal your judgement as Mordusia has informally consented to RP and it is legitimate.

I would love to get a war going, believe me, but unexpected circumstances have led to the election of an anti-war and pro-neutrality government in Mordusia. While I and other players informally consented to this a few weeks ago, it was not unanimous and other players have since arrived. Moderation has made a decision and we should respect that, instead of whining about it on here
macmckeown
 
Posts: 34
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2018 11:16 am

Re: Mordusia RP Appeal Thread

Postby FPC » Mon May 07, 2018 10:21 am

Sorry. But that does not seem like appropriate consent from Mordusia.

I agree that it sounds and interesting and well thought out RP situation and I think it would make an excellent story. However, it should be discussed in more detail with the players concerned and you should receive clear consent from the players controlling the country.
Particracy Moderation
Wiki Admin and Bureaucrat (for some reason)
User avatar
FPC
 
Posts: 718
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2016 6:14 am
Location: Scotland

Re: Mordusia RP Appeal Thread

Postby The Tea Party » Mon May 07, 2018 10:22 am

If this is ruled illegitimate roleplay; does that mean an attack on my labour camps by Dankuk is illegitimate as I have not consented?
The Tea Party
 
Posts: 56
Joined: Mon May 22, 2017 8:45 am

Re: Mordusia RP Appeal Thread

Postby The Tea Party » Mon May 07, 2018 10:33 am

May I report Yolo for non-consensual roleplay?
The Tea Party
 
Posts: 56
Joined: Mon May 22, 2017 8:45 am

Re: Mordusia RP Appeal Thread

Postby CozyBuddha » Mon May 07, 2018 12:42 pm

Hi there!

I represent the new anti-war government, a minority government made up solely by representatives from my party, the Progress Party, with Bachelot's National Movement as part of the parliamentary basis for my government. Mordusia has never formally declared war on Saridan and my party and Head of State has been elected on a clear anti-war platform, so that is not going to happen anytime soon either.

Even so, Mordusia has clearly consorted with the enemies of Saridan and taken part in international sanctions against the country, that we are repealing now. And we should clearly have talks with Saridan on how to make amendments and avert the treat of war. So that part of the RP should continue, in my opinion. Mordusia has had a long history of being a neutral country, and my party is trying to resurrect this well-established Mordusian tradition.

The Tea Party wrote:May I report Yolo for non-consensual roleplay?

I second this. When I read Yolo's post the last day, it felt incredibly unrealistic that Dankuk could simply jump into Saridan and "free" 10,000 people from labor camps. To my knowledge Mordusia has never consented to our territory being used as a staging ground for such an operation. But I believe that post has been deleted now? :?

Also we have not signed any defense treaty with them. They have proposed such a treaty but Mordusia has not ratified it.

Yolo also recently wrote in the Dankuk news tread that my party's government will apparently have a meeting with Dankukan representatives in Dankuk. While I see nothing wrong with the idea itself perhaps he should have asked me before posting that statement? The Mordusian Government is trying to appease Saridan and this might not exactly be a good time for deeper ties with its enemy Dankuk.
User avatar
CozyBuddha
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu May 03, 2018 3:05 pm

Next

Return to Game Moderation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Reddy and 2 guests