cm9777 wrote:
Done
The name is very long and messes my mobile view, perhaps just;
GA Resolution 1 (link)?
Moderator: RP Committee
cm9777 wrote:
Done
Cirith wrote:cm9777 wrote:
Done
The name is very long and messes my mobile view, perhaps just;
GA Resolution 1 (link)?
The following is a thread where users can post a query if they would like clarification or think an error was made whether it be from Moderation or a member of the GRC. This generally relates to all of the different requests present in the Game Moderation forum. If you do not feel comfortable asking publicly, you may also pm a moderator/GRC Member (Depending on what request it is) with your query, however, future queries should be directed here. This is to ensure that these request threads are not derailed which could result in the missing of other users requests.
Note that generally if you are messaged privately by a moderator/GRC Member you should reply to the said private message rather than express your query publicly since such matters are often sensitive issues. If you disagree with what you have been told/what has been done, the appropriate procedure is to ask for further clarification or point out where you think there was an error in judgement. At No point should this thread nor any other public thread, discord server etc. be used as a platform to grandstand or launch personal attacks against Moderation, the GRC or your fellow players. Constructive Criticism is always welcome and indeed essential but this should never resort to a personal level.
Occam wrote:Hi,
Is there any established way to completely oppose the World Council? If not is there any precedent? By completely oppose, I mean that a Nation does not send any representatives, refuses to make any payments, and does not acknowledge any kind of World Council decisions.
Regards,
Occam
Doc wrote:Hello:
Something funny happened in Kalistan today:
A Cabinet Bill
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=571900
proposed by the SP went down in defeat in June 4406, despite the voting deadline being set for February 4407. This Bill was meant to provide a unity government, and might have passed.
Could a moderator please restart this bill, so that the other Party may vote one way or another on it?
Thank you much,
Doc
cm9777 wrote:That is indeed a strange bug. I will contact Wouter about it. Unfortunately it’s not possible to re propose a bill but you can always do another proposal with the same features.
Occam wrote:cm9777 wrote:That is indeed a strange bug. I will contact Wouter about it. Unfortunately it’s not possible to re propose a bill but you can always do another proposal with the same features.
I don't think it's a bug. Kalistan had elections in June 4406 (when the bill failed). My guess would be that while other bills are thrown back to debate after elections, cabinet bills are thrown out. Which kind of makes sense in my opinion. If the bill was introduced after the elections but in the same month, maybe the lag with which election results come in messed things up.
cm9777 wrote:Occam wrote:cm9777 wrote:That is indeed a strange bug. I will contact Wouter about it. Unfortunately it’s not possible to re propose a bill but you can always do another proposal with the same features.
I don't think it's a bug. Kalistan had elections in June 4406 (when the bill failed). My guess would be that while other bills are thrown back to debate after elections, cabinet bills are thrown out. Which kind of makes sense in my opinion. If the bill was introduced after the elections but in the same month, maybe the lag with which election results come in messed things up.
Possible. I'll have to double check that with Wouter because generally bills are sent back to debate for an election as you said.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests