Amazeroth wrote:What you can't do, though, is to create a situation in which the mere exaction of game mechanics would constitute approval of a given RP.
I think this quote simply sums up everything that has happened.
Moderator: RP Committee
Amazeroth wrote:What you can't do, though, is to create a situation in which the mere exaction of game mechanics would constitute approval of a given RP.
Amazeroth wrote:Meaning that you can't go and say that just by forming opposition (as in forming a party not in line with your party's ideology or political goals) the other player has consented to your RP.
Siggon Kristov wrote:Amazeroth wrote:Meaning that you can't go and say that just by forming opposition (as in forming a party not in line with your party's ideology or political goals) the other player has consented to your RP.
I'm not talking about the existence of non-government parties; I'm talking about persons who will claim that the government is illegitimate.
If it is the in-character declaration that the government will deal with opposition a certain way, and players choose to oppose, then they are playing the role of the non-conformist opposition parties that someone like Pinochet would have gotten rid of.
kawn! wrote:Out of curiosity, how does this Republican-Monarchist civil war RP work when neither side has any position of power via game mechanics. How do they win? How do they lose? What is at stake?
kawn! wrote:I have control over the HOS, the HOG, and the cabinet, as well as 54% of the legislature. Out of curiosity, how does this Republican-Monarchist civil war RP work when neither side has any position of power via game mechanics. How do they win? How do they lose? What is at stake? Can they appoint themselves the rightful ruler of Darnussia in spite of the game mechanics saying they're not? The RP civil war was dependent on the Republicans being able to change the game mechanics to make Darnussia a Republic.
kawn! wrote:Well, in my case I am not to interfere with the other Darnussian party's RP, so I am not involved in that discussion. So, whatever they end up with, I don't know how it can work seeing as how I have everything. Can they RP something that directly contradicts the game mechanics?
kawn! wrote:Old value:: Her Imperial Majesty and Her Royal Highness Erikka I of Narikaton and III of Darnussia, Empress of Narikaton and Queen of Darnussia
Current: Kaiser William Cross of Luthori, Commander in Chief, and Defender of the Faith
Proposed: Kaiser William Cross of Luthori, Commander in Chief, and Defender of the Faith
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=391847
This bill passed in Darnussia with 2/3rds, William Cross is my character, the title of HOS was specifically changed to my character. I am the rightful HOS of Darnussia. The HOS is not Kaiser(.) with the idea that eventually it will be an elected position. If this is ignored, then so be it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests