Requests: Cultural Protocols - CPs [M]

[Polites]

Cultural Protocol update for Mikuni/Hulstria and Gao-Soto: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=676586

Differences from current version:

* decline in number of Hulstrians from 30% to 15%
* increase in number of Kunihito from 22% to 37%
* Gisoten removed and their 5% of the population transferred to Hulstro-Showans
* Yeudish and smaller ethnic groups removed (either moved to "Other" or to the larger ethnic groups)
* decline in number of Hosians from 48% to 33%
* Tenshism removed, as it was not well fleshed-out and is overly political
* increase in Gao-Showa religions (Daenism, Kamism, and Jienism - the latter newly introduced)
* Yeudism removed
* small changes in the percentages of the smaller religions

All these changes are justified by the continued rule by Kunihito or Hulstro-Showan regimes since the 4780s, some of which engaged in persecution and genocide against the Hulstrian people.

These regimes first came to power from this point on: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7531&start=1440#p162114

Some supporting posts:

viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7531&start=1450#p162552
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7531&start=1450#p163319
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7531&start=1470#p171834
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7531&start=1470#p171870
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7531&start=1470#p172364
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7531&start=1480#p173462
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7531&start=1490#p174058
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7531&start=1490#p174061
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7531&start=1490#p174064
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7531&start=1510#p174409
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7531&start=1520#p174470
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7531&start=1550#p176552
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7531&start=1550#p176568
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7531&start=1550#p176570
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7531&start=1560#p178847
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7531&start=1560#p179079

I will review this.

Any update on this by any chance?

[Auditorii]

Cultural Protocol update for Mikuni/Hulstria and Gao-Soto: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=676586

Differences from current version:

* decline in number of Hulstrians from 30% to 15%
* increase in number of Kunihito from 22% to 37%
* Gisoten removed and their 5% of the population transferred to Hulstro-Showans
* Yeudish and smaller ethnic groups removed (either moved to "Other" or to the larger ethnic groups)
* decline in number of Hosians from 48% to 33%
* Tenshism removed, as it was not well fleshed-out and is overly political
* increase in Gao-Showa religions (Daenism, Kamism, and Jienism - the latter newly introduced)
* Yeudism removed
* small changes in the percentages of the smaller religions

All these changes are justified by the continued rule by Kunihito or Hulstro-Showan regimes since the 4780s, some of which engaged in persecution and genocide against the Hulstrian people.

These regimes first came to power from this point on: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7531&start=1440#p162114

Some supporting posts:

viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7531&start=1450#p162552
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7531&start=1450#p163319
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7531&start=1470#p171834
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7531&start=1470#p171870
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7531&start=1470#p172364
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7531&start=1480#p173462
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7531&start=1490#p174058
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7531&start=1490#p174061
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7531&start=1490#p174064
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7531&start=1510#p174409
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7531&start=1520#p174470
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7531&start=1550#p176552
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7531&start=1550#p176568
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7531&start=1550#p176570
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7531&start=1560#p178847
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=7531&start=1560#p179079

Approved, please put this message link in your cultural protocol and a copy in the bills under debate section.

[WildBeast]

CP Update
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=678174

The only difference is a small correction in the adjectives used:

Lusitâniana -> Lusitana
Lusitanians are real, the correct adjective being Lusitana/Lusitano.

Afrikaaner -> Afrikaner
The correct word is Afrikaner.

Tukarêse -> Tukarense
Tukarêse is a weird adjectivization of Tukarali, leading to a weird pronunciation. Tukarense has a better flow in a normal sentence, and is probably how the adjectivization would happen naturally.
Example: Madeira's adjective is Madeirense, and not Madeirêse.

[journey.]

http://classic.particracy.net/viewparty ... tyid=44400
English names in Alduria :0

[Auditorii]

CP Update
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=678174

The only difference is a small correction in the adjectives used:

Lusitâniana -> Lusitana
Lusitanians are real, the correct adjective being Lusitana/Lusitano.

Afrikaaner -> Afrikaner
The correct word is Afrikaner.

Tukarêse -> Tukarense
Tukarêse is a weird adjectivization of Tukarali, leading to a weird pronunciation. Tukarense has a better flow in a normal sentence, and is probably how the adjectivization would happen naturally.
Example: Madeira's adjective is Madeirense, and not Madeirêse.

Give me a few days, I'll take a look over it.

[WildBeast]

CP Update
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=678174

The only difference is a small correction in the adjectives used:

Lusitâniana -> Lusitana
Lusitanians are real, the correct adjective being Lusitana/Lusitano.

Afrikaaner -> Afrikaner
The correct word is Afrikaner.

Tukarêse -> Tukarense
Tukarêse is a weird adjectivization of Tukarali, leading to a weird pronunciation. Tukarense has a better flow in a normal sentence, and is probably how the adjectivization would happen naturally.
Example: Madeira's adjective is Madeirense, and not Madeirêse.

Give me a few days, I'll take a look over it.

hey, did you get time to take a look at it?

[Auditorii]

CP Update
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=678174

The only difference is a small correction in the adjectives used:

Lusitâniana -> Lusitana
Lusitanians are real, the correct adjective being Lusitana/Lusitano.

Afrikaaner -> Afrikaner
The correct word is Afrikaner.

Tukarêse -> Tukarense
Tukarêse is a weird adjectivization of Tukarali, leading to a weird pronunciation. Tukarense has a better flow in a normal sentence, and is probably how the adjectivization would happen naturally.
Example: Madeira's adjective is Madeirense, and not Madeirêse.

Give me a few days, I'll take a look over it.

hey, did you get time to take a look at it?

These appear to be fine with me, I'll start the 48 hours for comments and we'll go from there.

[WildBeast]

These appear to be fine with me, I'll start the 48 hours for comments and we'll go from there.

After 48h, is it automatically approved, or does Moderation still need to review it?

[Auditorii]

CP Update
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=678174

The only difference is a small correction in the adjectives used:

Lusitâniana -> Lusitana
Lusitanians are real, the correct adjective being Lusitana/Lusitano.

Afrikaaner -> Afrikaner
The correct word is Afrikaner.

Tukarêse -> Tukarense
Tukarêse is a weird adjectivization of Tukarali, leading to a weird pronunciation. Tukarense has a better flow in a normal sentence, and is probably how the adjectivization would happen naturally.
Example: Madeira's adjective is Madeirense, and not Madeirêse.

This is approved, please put a link to the passed copy of the Cultural Protocols and a link to this approval message in the "Bills under debate" section.

[journey.]

http://classic.particracy.net/viewparty ... tyid=44597

Cabinet names, randomly english, lol.