Romulus wrote:The SCL comments should be disregarded as they were not present during the making of the military proposal.
-Friedhelm Royaliwith
Chairman of the Imperial National Party
Ah, so the only opinions on the military bill that should matter are those that come from the former ExecCouncil members?
On the issue of the compromise....
Yes, I acknowledge that the quorum rule is action-prohibitive and would cause stagnation in the organization. However, given the timing of the amendment and the nature of the bill that failed due to the quorum rule, we had to oppose the amendment out of principle.
We would, however, support the entire amendment if we added a clause requiring a military bill to be held to the old standards, as suggested by the NDP of Zardugal.
That being said, we would also support the idea of the peacekeeper force with strict limitations on their deployment (things like genocide, atrocities, etc.), so we would not consider that a "military" bill for purposes of the additional "military bill quorum" clause.