To the honurable representatives of the Nations of the Majatran Alliance,
we would like first of all express all our disappointment to see Governments of this organization to take side in favor of a violent golpe justifying this decision claiming false allegations against a political movement, the SU, accused to have manipulated the elections and to want enforce a totalitarian communist regime, allegations lead by an unacceptable biased ideological positions. We declares these allegations as 'false', because, as already underlined, no one was able to offer evidences of electoral frauds or of totalitarian tendencies.
The Majatran Alliance was founded on the principles and values of Tollerance, Freedom, State of Law and primary of Democracy, without any reference or limitation for this or that political movement or ideology since with its actions it remain within a democratic framework.
We would demand, for this reason, to the Government of Pontesi to offer us evidences of the attempt of the socialist party in Deltaria to install a meztist dictatorship. But we already know that Pontesi will be not able to show us such evidence.
The Socialist Union, indeed, proved to be a political movement devoted to the democracy and the pluralism which, most important, despite the questionable behavior of the Czar and his party of the previous years, accepted, and proposed, to maintain the monarchy in Deltaria and to not undermine the imperial role of the Csar and his family.
Who dares to call this a "meztist behavior"?
Now, honorable delegates, we want really know: how a nation which defines itself a democracy, could support a government which support such provision:
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=559247, which support the idea that some men, just because belong to this or that family, should have major rights compared to the rest of the other citizens.
We would just underline, and remember, that a Democracy, to meet the definition, shall provide that "every individual is equal before and under the law". If someone here dares to deny this, well... we can only invite these people to be ashamed of and to immediatly return to read some book about political science, political phylosophy and political history, something which however should be well-known by part of any politician who declares to be a supporter of the Democracy.
Democracy, clearly provides the right for citizens or group of them to express freely their political ideas and to criticize their government. Now, let analyzing the situation: who claimed to be a persecuted political movement? Who suffered the desappearing of notable party's members which still have not be seen but are still in the hand of the Csarists? Who, once at the power, never denied to the losing side to continue its political activity and to express its political positions? Who, once at the power, despite the possibility to abolish the monarchy, accepted instead to conduct its political activity under the previous system of government? But, most important, who didn't accepted the electoral outcome attempting to take the power through violence?
A democracy works first of all when there is the political maturity by part of the political forces to accept the defeats and to respect the will of the citizens. It is true, also under a democracy many thinks that the citizens have the right to rebel against the government if it fails to respect the democratic mandade, but the idea that a faction could rebels against its government just to maintain the power or to take the power, well... this is really unacceptable and deprecable!
Before to conclude, we have to express also our disappointment for the possibility that this organization retains a neutral position on this issue, because acting in this way this organization will betray all its principles, will betray one of its foundamental mission: promote and protect the Democracy in Majatra. So, how could this organization remain neutral when a democracy risk to be destroyed by the idiocy of some people aimed just to maintain thier power and not to assure to the well-being of their citizens?
This organization cannot but condemn the Csarists and heavily blame any government or political force ready to support in any way the Csarists, especially if ideologically biased.
On the specific, someone should remember that not all the political ideologies and movements which can be labelled as "leftist" are aimed to stamp out political, civil, social and economic rights to enforce a dictatorship of proletariat. The Istalian Republic few years ago was government by a cabinet led by a party which openly declares itself as Metzist. For centuries Istalia saw numberous socialist and communist parties contucting their political activities and also leading government under the democratic framework of our nation. The same in Selucia, well... probably also more than in Istalia! For more than 200 years an openly self-declared socialist and leftist political force has leading the nation for most part of the time, but Selucia since long time has been always ranked among the most democratic nations of whole Terra. Indeed, when the democracy in Selucia has been undermine, the responsability often was of rightist government or monarchical one.
A Democracy is a Democracy when there are no limitations to specific ideologies a part those necessary to assure its very survival, limits that are not aimed to dany rights to this or that ideology, but which limits any behavior and action aimed to abolish the Democracy and undermine the democratic rights of the citizens. And, once again, someone has evidence that the SU acted to abolish citizens' rights and democratic principles in Deltaria? Indeed we can only recognize to SU to have improved greatly the democracy in Deltaria, first of all banning the Nobles' major rights.
Finally, a democracy cannot be called in this way if a government doesn't respect also the economical rights of the citizens and the private property is the foundamental one. But the Socialist Union doesn't seem to have never proposed to abolish this foundamental right. The Government of Pontesi has evidence of this? We still don't think so. For this reason the Majatran Alliance cannot act against the Socialist Government or the Socialist Union, which always acted inside the framework of a Democracy and indeed tried to improve the democracy in Deltaria, well... to litterarly reintroduce it abolishing any political privilege for a small group of persons (the nobles) without any merit to justify it.
For all this reason we demand to the Majatran Alliance, and we will make pression to the Istalia Government, to assure recognition to the Republic created by the Socialist Government, to condemn the actions of the Csarists and to doesn't graant any recognition to any form of political organization under the previous and dethroned Csar.
A neutral stance would only be a defeat for this organization, a betrayal of the mission of promoting and protecting democracy denying its assistance to democratic forces which fight for equal rights and democratic values.
If some Government of the Alliance dares to deny these reasons, clear facts and not obscure allegations without evidence, well... probably this Government doesn't understand at all what is a democracy, what this organization wants promote and defend and probably doesn't deserve to be member of this organization.
Thank you