Mrs Akhun,
very well... it is clear that this organization in the future will be charaterized by different group of members with different kind of integration and partecipation, a majatran alliance at different speeds.
We expected to find such difficulties, like in other contexts, and for this reason the Istalian administrations worked on different treaties related to different field. Unfurtunately there are no possibilities to exclude the article to contrast any form of discrimination into the armed forces, we will not accept this. But you are free to not ratify the treaty. This will greatly affect the relations of your country with other members and I think this will affect also the degree of benefits, especially economic one, that your nation will be able to have.
As said, one cannot have one's cake and eat it. The Majatran Alliance can offer one of the largest common market of Terra where a member nation can export and import easier goods, materials and money, where its workers can have privileged services and work easily in other country, where the financial market can boast an important stability thanks to the mechanims of the MACU which can in turn assure stability to the national currency.
But this organization has not been founded just to be an economic organization, the treaty of the Majatran Alliance it is clear on the fact that among the primary objectives of the organization there is the protection and promotion of democratic principles. It is not a case if today Deltaria and Kafuristan are suspended and we have clearly already expressed similar concerns on the peace solution reached in Deltaria.
So, nobody is forced to ratify this treaty, but then, do not be surprised if other member will adopt different relations with your nation or will vote in a determined way into the Executive Committee of the Alliance on this or that issue.
To respond to the Minister Roth, instead, can we ask to remark what provision made a "socialist pact" this treaty on foundamental Principles? You said that in this treaty "the legislation is loose enough to allow for a wide range of government types, yet rigid enough that it preserves the core principles of democracy". You said right! It was thought for a wide rage of Government types and to enhance veritably the mission of the Alliance, and we would just report here an extract from the Alliance's founding treaty which says:
"CONVINCED of the importance of strengthening and diversifying their relations on an equitable and mutually advantageous basis in a long-term perspective
always promoting and respecting the democratic principle and the respect of the most basic human rights"
promoting and respecting are the keywords! And this Chart of Foundamental Rights is nothing but a treaty thought to promote and make respect democracy and human rights.
And, just to say... this treaty has been mainly drafted by a nationalistic party, no socialist party had part in the creation of this treaty. It is not the fault of this administration if in Istalia even the Nationalists or the Communists understand how should work a democracy.
About the invective made by the Prince of Pontesi, instead, well... It seems another useless blabbering and allegations about communism and socialism but this time also insults and discrimination against the homosexual, about which we don't really understand the motivation of these discrimination and how does that concern this debate.
This organization doesn't exist to fight this or that ideology, this organization was founded primary to defend the rights of the human beings in Majatran from illiberal, dicatorial and totalitarian regimes. The fact that at the time of its foundation this organization was born to contrast a socialist regime doesn't mean that the Majatran Alliance is a counter-socialist or communist organization and what is sure Istalia will do the possible to avoid such degradation of the organization.
Indeed, we protest formally with the Pontesian Government for his insult against an ideology which is the one of several other governments currently in power in Majatra and other historical parties well known around the world for their committment against any form of dictature. Like In Marea-Civis Sinistram, a party which cannot but receive praise, congratulations and global plause, considered at the global scale as one of the most democratic, liberal, tollerant national party of the recent centuries of Terra, which is a self declared socialist party.
The Prince of Pontesi, furthermore, insulted member parties of the current government of Istalia which are insipred to socialism, he insulted the Government of Cildania, we can also said that he insulted the Government of Jakania, which ruling party inspired itself to the socialdemocracy, which is nothing but a descendant of socialism, he insulted citizens all over the other members of the Alliance which belong and believes in socialist, social democratic, communist ideologies and parties.
And about the allegations against Istalia about to be a warmongering nation, well... can his excellence the Prince of Pontesi come here in person to say before all the other nations of the Alliance who started an armed uprising? Who attempted a violent coup? Who unleashed a civil war? Istalia maybe? You should have a great courage to declares such falsity! Indeed, Mr Nikolai Von Thaller is a war criminal and nothing else!
And... a last word for the Prince, if you think that the Majatran Alliance is an organization which judges a person on the basis of his family, if you think that the Majatran Alliance is an organization which promotes the ideas of a fixed position for every person, you are wrong!
Instead, we profit of this moment to plaude and congratulates the Government and the political forces of Barmenistan for their great entente in deciding to abolish all form of corporal punishement in their nation:
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=559935. A great signs of civilization which we cannot but praise.
If Pontesi has nothing else to say to improve this debate, nobody force its government to continue to attend this session in the light of the fact that it is better for you insults and launch unfouded allegations. We have just showed the clear inconsistencies and critical issues of your legislation about the political rights diffusion in your country regarding the values of this organization, from an accademic point of view about what is a Democracy. There are not Pontesian democracy, istalian democracy or selucian democracy. There are principles without which simply there is no Democracy, and to exclude a merchant, a factory workers, an architect or an employee just because doesn't own a piece of land is not at all something which can have something to do with democracy!
It's not the socialists to say it, it's not the communists to say it, but 4 millennia of jurisprudence, philosophy, political thought and history. We doesn't attack without elements this or that party or this or that ideology. And... I think that in Majatra there are very few nations which can talk with more authoritativeness about Democracy than Istalia which, despite your allegations, is as well recognized as one of the most democratic, liberal and tollerant nations of the world, recognized by numberous international organizations and voted into the Security Council also precisely because its deep devotion to the democratic cause.
The conseguences of your decision will emerge in the future relations between you, the Alliance and the other members. Will be the other members to decide how to relate them with you. What is sure is that Istalia will continue to commit itself to contrast such relativistic behavior, to promote the true democracy and liberty, to promote equal rights for every single human beings born into a member nation of the Majatran Alliance. Do you want not to have obligations but just benefits? This will never happen since Istalia will be into this organization!
An international organization is also this, like any other international treaty, agreement, entente and so on: a nation commit itself to respect some agreements established with other nations. Any international treaty or organization in a way or another limits the sovereignty of a nation. If you don't want such limitations, why agree to sign a treaty or enter into a supranational organization?