Mr Demaria,
what is the name of this organization? The Majatran Union of Nations, OF NATIONS. Not of people, not of parties, not of political movements and so on, but of NATIONS! And probably the greatest weakness of the MUN, despite the great hopes for the future, it's that we want work like a supernational state when... simply we are not ready! We are talking without considering the will of each National Government! This assembly cannot work without considering the national governments which, I fear, will be never too ready to lose so great part of their sovereignty. It is a fear based on the history, on what we saw and we see, a continent made of many souls, so many cultures, so many interests and... too much changements in little time... This body cannot work without an official body where the National Governments are represented. Probably the Majatran Alliance was too much a Government's organizations, but the MUN seems not to consider the National Governments privileging this body.
Often, in fact, the Governments, and not the citizens, know what really is better for a nation or for an organization of which the nation is part, it is for this reason that the referndum conducted in Istalia was not binding for the Government. The Istalian party from I came, in fact, is pushing the Government to establish serious debate and negotiations with the MUN to avoid too hasty decision. Istalia since long time asked that many of the Majatran Alliance bodies and systems would be translated into the MUN, what this body or the MUN proposed? We saw just proposals on proposals which doesn't care of the Istalian proposals, which doesn't care of the achievement of the Majatran Alliance.
And on this point, me, as member of the GPPM, I fully agree with my Government on this! The Majatran Alliance was totally condemned for its uneffectiveness during the Jelbanian crisis. But it was the fault of Istalia? I don't think! Istalia, despite the allegations of hunger of power, was the only one that supported the Majatran Alliance and actively worked within, always pushing for more partecipation. But I think it is useless now to start to make reproachs against this or that nation. Instead, let see what of good the MA brought in Majatra! A great economic system, harmonized, cooperative and integrated! Let see the achievements of the MACU, which graanted monetary stability for more than a century, innaugurated the period of greatest growth and investments in centuries if not millennia, assured the growth of the economy of many nations and the greatest improvement of the living conditions for millions and millions of Majatrans.
A new currency, a common commodity currency, to be already tested for a rapid introduction, it is really the solution for this crisis? We fear that without a long period of preparation and harmonization, a fast introduction of a common commidity currency could generate more problems.
Here, someone, seems pushing just to delete what of good made in the past to replace totally it with something of new... but is it the will of the MUNGA, of the MUN's President or... of some nations in search of a place under the sun? And seeing how easily also here Istalia is attacked and accused... some suspect can arise, but... it is sad... after all the efforts Istalia made to create a continental alliance and to make survive it for more than a century.
We think that we have to respect the time we need and not to go too fast! Let see a compromise between the international organization-oreinted MA and the Democratic/popular-oriented MUN.
It could be a good proposal, to start, to integrate what was the Executive Allied Committee of the Majatran Alliance into the new organization as Council of Majatran Governments, where, depending of the argoument touched this or that day, the competent ministries of each member can meet and debate alongside the MUNGA. We could also propose to give to the MUNGA the authority to propose some names for the Presidency of the organization and to the new Council the authority to elect him (also now the nations decides who support, why not to let the nation decide it into the new proposed Council?
And, for the moment, for the neature itself of Majatra and its numberous souls, we think that the decisions of the Council should be take uninamously or at least with an important qualified majority.
Finally, sorry if seems that I'm assuming also the role of representive of my nation, but... within the MUN, who assumed this role? And as Istalian, I think it is my duty to express into the MUNGA my concerns and the ones of my fellow citizens.
Thank you