Mr Malga, Istalian Ambassador to the World Congress:
Also my nation followed the evolution of the situation between Pontesi and Lodamun, and given the evidences and the official condemnation by the pontesian government against Mr Ravel, it would be warmly that Lodamun returned on his steps and agreed to hand over Mr Ravel, condemned in absentia, to the pontesiane authorities. We cannot fail to recognise as the granting of citizenship to the pontesian terrorist has been a move to allow to adjust the situation of Ravel to the Lodamun legislation that avoid extradition for its citizens. A measures that contributing to create a difficult situation and we believe that the request from Pontesi is legitime.
But, it is also real that currently Pontesi provides the death penality to those guilty of terrorism and we are also concerned about that. Also Istalia doesn't allow extradition to nations with capital punishment or with cruel or inhumane treatment of suspects and convicts and we understand why the government of Ludamun avoided the extradition, hoping that do not exist other hidden motivations behind this decision.
In fact, kill an human being, this human being, will not appease the pain of the families of the victims caused by the terrorist acts of this person, certainly not back them to life. The death penalty is nothing but a form of revenge, and revenge is absolutely not synonymous with justice.
We believe in the right of Pontesi to bring this person towar the Justice, it's really a sacrosant right, but we would betray our most solid principles and our deepest beliefs if my country pushed for extradition to Pontesi sending to certain death this individual.
But now, waiting for further negotiations, we demand to the Lodamun government first of all to recognize the sins of Ravel, recognizing him as a criminal and a terrorist who has stained his hands of the blood of countless innocent lives and then to provide an treatment adeguate to a terrorist, ie, preventing him from leading a normal life as a neo citizen of Lodamun, condemning it, for now, as a citizen of Lodamun guilty of terrible crimes overseas and then intern him in a penal facility waiting for the resolution of this international crisis, to prevent him to flee to other countries willing to accept him, a measures that it would be much wiser by the Lodamun Government that at this time we can not deny is clearly protecting a criminal.
We can accept the protection of the person as human being from cruel treatment and from the death penalty, but we can not accept the protection and safeguarding of a criminal as an ordinary citizen free to move and live a normal life who, during his stay in Lodamun, should be treated only as a criminal.
Thank you