I thank Mr Aslan for his response and will attempt to answer his questions:
Point One: the DMZ is proposed on both sides of the border, if agreed our defensive troops will withdraw 2km into Baltusian territory too. This is surely not unreasonable?
Point two: Again, I say it is no secret about our nuclear capability. You will see from this defence review three years ago that this is well recognised and overwhelmingly supported by the vast majority of parties in our country.
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=482217
Point three: I stand to be corrected but according to my records Mr Benn fled shortly after sentencing had taken place, although perhaps the Supreme Court justice who sentenced could answer this or you could review the court clerk's records. (OOC: I can't properly tell if it was between the guilty verdict and sentencing or after sentencing but the bill order suggests it was after sentencing and the dialogue in the sentencing bill suggests Mr Benn was in situ for sentencing). I say again though he had been in prison for 15 months on remand up to and including the trial, in which time he was unharmed and treated well – as is every prisoner in Baltusia. So why would this have been different after sentencing?
Thank you.
I am sorry but I must now return to Baltusia to recommence my departmental duties. A Patriotic Party delegation party will arrive shortly to assist the conference.