Particracy Forum

The D.C.A. doesnt beleive in the right to life, otherwise abortion would atleast bother your conscience. We have simply asked for the gurantee that the noble class wont be stripped of their current rights and a gurantee of gun rights; is that really so extreme to ask for your compromise in those two areas, the INDC has requested a long list of demands and we are willing to comprimise on the rights of homosexuals, and gurantees for the poor but the D.C.A. must be willing to compromise in some area

George Milton
Whig Party Chairman
Premier of Deltaria 3431-

The RCP accepts to compromise in the matter of nobility protection and gun rights. However, the protection given to nobles mustn't compromise the other people's rights and the gun licenses have to be subjected to certain regulations that assure us that the person is mentally suited to have such dangerous objects.
Abortion, in the other hand, should be permitted but regulated. That regulation must, at least, permit to abort in extreme cases or in situations of need. Hence, regulation has to exist, even if a little strict, to avoid leaving unprotected the foetus, but also protecting what is more important: the mother's life.

Of course, to accept those things implies that:
- The minority rights are respected (homosexual rights among others).
- Measures to help the poor people are added, specially a public health care system.
What we want is that everyone has equal opportunities, and that can't be reached if we don't treat different situations differently. You can't expect a low-income person to create an enterprise if his first preoccupation is having to pay the bills of an overpriced health care clinic or expensive medical drugs that he needs to survive.

Government intervention is what causes prices to rise and artificially at that. We can agree to homosexual and other minority rights in exchange for noble rights, and gun rights for most. If we are to agree to free healthcare and prescriptions then we will be forced to ask for an increase in the rights of nobility or an extension to make it hereditary for it is this gentry class that bears the most of the cost for these programs.

George Milton
Whig Party Chairman
Premier 3431-

We agree to amplify the nobility rights to the point where they grant minor political rights, being it hereditary or not, as you wish. Nevertheless, it is not acceptable for us or any democratic nation to give some people major rights over the others. We believe that some people should be rewarded for their service to the country, which is why we accept the figure of the nobles, but we do not believe in it being a form of division of the population between the ones that have privileges and the rest of the citizens, subjugated to the first.

We can agree to minor political rigts for nobility, and we would prefer these rights be enshrined as hereditary but that is debatable. It is time to put forth a proposal in the forum so this all can be debated

George Milton
President of Deltaria
whig Party chairman

The DBSM has no intention of supporting this.

The PZP will not give this its support either.

Radislav Koniev
Partyleade

What about this Bill of Rights compromise does the PZP oppose?