Re: Peace Conference on Anantonese Bush War
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2018 8:53 am
Kazulian Delegation responds to Kalistani Comments
Kazulian Delegation responds to Kalistani Comments; reiterating nation's stated intentions for peace
12th January, 4415
Kazulian Delegation responds to Kalistani Comments; reiterating nation's stated intentions for peace
12th January, 4415
As we stated and we will reiterate: Freedom of navigation accounts for commercial and military vessels. If the Kalistani delegation views the straits of Anato as sovereign territory championing the sentiment that the transit of combatant vessels through the straits (combatant vessels which have not harassed the nation but has left it to its elements) then it remains outside of the concert of nations. So i ask the question: In a hypothetical situation, if we are to agree on the sentiment of allowing for commercial transit only through the straits, would Kalistan actively work in ensuring that their friends, the Kingdom of Vanuku operates outside of this "designated area" and will engage their ships similar to how they engaged our combatant vessels and subsequently destroyed a commercial cargo vessel?
Once again we see the action of Kalistan in the build up the Terran War which saw the nation restrict shipping in the Anantonese Sea. We do not intend on compromising on the sentiment on restrictions to freedom of navigation.