OOC Source: Copyright and Brand IQCahtice: The Minister of Justice Petra Žižková proposed reforms to the judiciary almost two years ago. While in theory small, this reform caused a storm of debates both publicly as well as politically. For two years the minister has been battling to get the bill on the floor of the senate and passed by a majority of senators. The reform is one focussed on reforming the jurors system. While as of now jurors are randomly picked from the populace the minister and her ministry have proposed a reform to change that, instead of randomly picking from the whole populace a jury should, after the reform is implemented, only be picked from professional lawyers. Such a reform, according to the minister and the government, would professionalize the jury's and give experienced law professionals the reigns over life or death scenarios. Such a reform would, according to Žižková, make the judiciary more professional and fair to suspects who would not be in the hands of ordinary non trained citizens.
Opponents of the reform state that the intend of a jury is to feel the emotion of a case, to determine guilty or innnocence not only based of actual law but also based of the situation someone is in. Žižková and her ministry have for the past two years stated that these arguments are not in touch with reality, "The point of the judiciary is looking at the law and making judgements based on the law. A professional jury would ensure that the law is always applied in a correct way. It would reduce the chance for judicial inequality and pathe the way for a truly efficient judiciary." Two months ago the law finally got onto the senate floor, being debated for over four sessions until, a week ago, the vote was held. It was a tight end result, 299 against and 323 for the bill. This despite all of the senate being in KDU hands. The KDU has in recent years proven that most of its senators take their job extremely seriously, often voting based on pragmatism instead of party lines. This has caused some headaches for the party leadership and government but has also allowed the party to portray itself as a truly big-tent party will several wings and different opinions in it.
With this vote the new jury reform is set to be formally enacted on the first of january next year. Ending a 30 year long period of "unprofessional" jury's and, according to the government, creating a fairer, more efficient and more professional judiciary.