by Amazeroth » Fri Jun 04, 2010 10:31 pm
What has befallen Rutania?
Rutenian analysts declare their nation's views the objective basis of moral judgement
a commentary by political analyst Dr. Christopheros Patriakis
Has Rutania become insane? This is the first question most of our colleagues asked when they first heard of the new statement of the Rutanian Foreign Office. Apparently now the Rutanian Minister of Foreign Affairs, Javier Kreuz, sees himself as the sole decider of right and wrong - or so the Rutanian analysts seem to believe. Mr. Kreuz has issued a statement in which he, completely unprovoked, decided to remind the whole of Terra, apparently, that there is such a thing as souvereignty, and that it has to be accepted by every state in order not to fall into global anarchy. An interesting statment at an interesting time.
Why an interesting statement? Firstly, because it is issued by the same man who just months ago defended the Axis, the by far biggest organisation that chooses to ignore the souvereignty that seems to have suddenly become so dear to Mr. Kreuz. An organisation that has taken it upon itself to decide where the borders of individual nations begin, and when to forget about sovereignty at all. Secondly, because Mr. Kreuz is the Foreign Affairs Minister of a nation that currently owns colonies on Dovani. Colonies - the very blight on Terra, the living monument, if you will, to the complete disregard of the people who lived there before, and of the Dovani nations who had taken it upon themselves to protect these people - and on their front Sekowo, a country now in grave turmoil, and another failure of the Axis. Why is it, that such a man suddenly conjures up a moral need to preach to the rest of Terra of sovereignty?
We have to look at the time now: This statement comes now, just after the nation of Selucia has taken the ambassador of Al'Badara hostage - an act that will, at this point, likely lead to more violence, and in the worst case, to war. Why should this concern Rutenia though, it being far away, even on another continent (or two other continents, considering their colonies)? Is this about the terrorist attacks in Dovani? Hardly, as Rutenias souvereignty is not in danger because of them. Apparently, despite the obvious first impression, Rutenia seems to see some danger in the Al'Badara-Seleucia-Crisis. And the danger it sees, it does not see because of Rutenian people or territory being endangered, nor because of a sudden change of heart of Mr. Kreuz. Once again, the Axis stands behind his actions.
This can be seen more clearly if we concentrate on the commentary of Rutenian analyst Professor Ingeborg Helvet. Apart from obvious, well, I would call it bootlicking if I was going to be that rude, in declaring that now that Mr. Kreuz has spoken, Rutania has clearly found the objective base of morality the world has been searching for, there are some sentences worth reading twice. "A state becomes a negative character not because of others use wrongly concepts, manipulate public opinion. But because of wrong deeds." Sentences that are all the more interesting because they are not at all related to the message of the Minister, but seem to show the spirit behind the minister's words in a very clear light. This is nothing else than a message to the nations that have started criticising the Axis lately, and it is the same Mr Kreuz said months earlier:
"A state becomes a negative character" - states that have problems due to the Axis; "not because of others [who] use wrongly concepts, manipulate public opinion" - it is not the Axis' fault; "But because of wrong deeds" - it's their own fault.
Professor Helvet says, once again, that the states who now criticise the Axis because of the problems the Axis caused, because of the Axis standing for a few nations and protecting them by abusing others, that these faults wrongly address the Axis, and that the problems were their own fault. We have all heard such statements before and know well how to see through them.
So, where is the relation between this old message, and the minister's new one? Why is this message retold now, when Al'Badara and Seleucia are on the edge of violent conflict? This becomes clear if the following is considered: Both Seleucia and Al'Badara are members of the Axis! Apparently, the Axis not only failed to prevent such violent developments, but is now preparing Terra for its next big failure: the Axis apparently is not willing to react to such behaviour between its own members directly, but only through statements of ministers from far-away countries. And apparently, the Axis is not willing to do something in the event of an escalation, otherwise we wouldn't have to hear sermons about souvereignty from said ministers. A dark prospect for terra indeed.
Eines Tages traf Karl der Große eine alte Frau.
"Guten Tag, alte Frau", sagte Karl der Große.
"Guten Tag, Karl der Große", sagte die alte Frau.
Solche und ähnliche Geschichten erzählt man sich über die Leutseligkeit Karls des Großen.