Interviewer: I would like to start by noting that you are far from a stranger to political scandal. Your public refusal to implement the results of the referendum have caused quite a stir. What motivated your choice to disregard popular will expressed in the referendum?
al-Masih: We had no choice but to refuse to implement the results of the referendum. Our predecessor party, Insieme, was originally founded with the explicit purpose of overthrowing the monarchy. We cannot now betray our principles, our values, and our voters by voting to restore monarchy, no matter the result of the referendum.
Interviewer: Is respect for democracy then not a value of your party? How do you justify rejecting a referendum where the results were overwhelmingly in favor of restoration?
al-Masih: I believe this referendum is not a true reflection of popular will. I think the main reason why "yes" won has less to do with any deeply ingrained monarchist sentiment and more to do with partisan loyalty. Centrist voters, most of whom support Hosian Democracy, voted "yes" because their party campaigned strongly for restoration. Why HD campaigned that way I don't know, but I have a theory.
Interviewer: What is your theory?
al-Masih: I believe Hosian Democracy never had any intention of restoring monarchy. If they did they would have done so when they had a constitutional majority with Blue Flame. Instead I think this referendum was a way for them to sabotage monarchism while at the same time signaling to their coalition partners that they remain loyal allies. Had the referendum failed the matter would have been dropped. Now that it succeeded, we are left in the awkward position of having to refuse to implement a democratic plebiscite while HD can shift the blame for the failure of restoration on to us. But I'm not in their party so this is only speculation. The fact remains that HD sabotaged restoration, willingly or not, and for that we are grateful to them.
Interviewer: You mentioned that many of the "yes" votes were motivated by partisan loyalty. But surely that can't explain most of the votes for restoration. Your party has often stated that monarchism does not reflect popular will. How can you claim that when a significant part of Istalian society is clearly monarchist?
al-Masih: Voter loyalty to Hosian Democracy is just one cause of the votes for monarchism. Although this is worrisome, it is ultimately ephemeral. What worries me much more is the other cause, which I believe is the insidious effect of centuries of imperial propaganda that have convinced generations of Istalians that the Empire was a democracy and that the first emperor was a great and noble hero, when in actual fact he was undeniably a dictator and the Empire was a thinly veiled dictatorship.
Michele came to power as a dictator who ruled with absolute powers for nearly 20 years as the "
Head of State" of the Istalian Republic. The Istalian elites who backed him suggested he turn his personalistic dictatorship into a hereditary monarchy, thus ensuring the perpetuation of their rule and peaceful succession. A key player in the establishment of the hereditary dictatorship of the Appiani was Paolo Tarso, whose party had the role of placating the working classes and giving them minor concessions to gain their support for the perpetuation of imperial rule. In spite of all this, listen how history textbooks
talk about Michele even today [opens highschool history textbook]: "one who, like no one in centuries, had succeeded in inflaming the hearts of the Istalians and creating such hopes and expectations, reinforced by the great performances of the nation which was raising its slope with exceptional rapidity, had entered the heart of the population", and "its savior, who was reviving the fortunes of the country with such brilliance, would remain a timeless figure always keeping watch over the country's destiny". This is not objective history, this is naked propaganda bereft of any critical thinking, with no other purpose than to indoctrinate the population into accepting the hereditary rule of an obvious dictator.
Interviewer: If what you call "imperial propaganda" is such a widespread problem, how do you propose to tackle it?
al-Masih: A thorough reform of school curricula is a necessary first step. Another solution would be to address the ubiquitous public monuments glorifying the imperial regime, starting with the
Imperial Mausoleum. I don't remember now who it was, I think one of the politicians from the Left Bloc, who, when the mausoleum was being built, called it a "pharaonic project" and
proposed to have the remains of the imperial family interred there exhumed. Unfortunately this never came to pass, but if my party enters government at any point in the future we will make the exhumation of the dictatorial family from the mausoleum a priority.
Interviewer: It is strange that you insist on calling the Istalian Empire a dictatorship when the whole world has considered it to be one of the most democratic nations in Terran history. Do you think "imperial propaganda" has affected all of Terra?
al-Masih: That "democracy" was an illusion to cover a clientelistic and personalistic regime. As long as the economy was thriving and a modicum of welfare measures could keep the population complacent the imperial regime did not need to resort to naked force to stay in power. For this even the radical republican opposition of the Left Bloc and others like it ultimately helped unwittingly perpetuate the regime, as these opposition movements had enough power to articulate a coherent and powerful critique of the Empire, but were never allowed to seriously threaten it, granting the population the illusion it had a choice in the matter. But when the economic power of the regime ended that is when the elites resorted to more violent means. First, after progressive forces succeeded in abolishing the Empire, the elites instituted a reactionary and clericalist regime. Then, when its stability was threatened, they established the military dictatorship of "Generalissimo" Tivoli. And lastly, after the restoration of democracy, the elites orchestrated the coup d'état of 5074.
Interviewer: You keep using that word, "coup", to refer to the events of '74. But so far you have not provided any evidence for your allegations. What proof do you have that the elections to the Constituent Assembly were a coup d'état?
al-Masih: The events speak for themselves. In the
elections of '65 the democratic parties had won a constitutional majority and were at the height of their power. Then, over the span of a few years, two major national parties were mysteriously dissolved, leaving a minor far-right party, whose ties to the military and security apparatus are now well known, as the only political force in the nation. Not long after the suspicious dissolution of the Popular Front of Alaria an insurrection took place, as the supporters of the far-right illegally
occupied municipal headquarters throughout the nation, effectively handing power to Identity and Unity. In order to legitimate its rule the far-right called for elections for a "Constituent Assembly", which, unsurprisingly, were overwhelmingly won by the party that organized, supervised, and counted the results of the election. An election that somehow returned a massive Istalianist and monarchist majority, when just a few years earlier the population had overwhelmingly voted for separatist and republican parties. If this is not a coup, then I don't know what is. I truly wish I could prove this in a court of law, but knowing how the elites have full control over the courts I hold no hope.
Interviewer: Lastly, your political activities have also brought you into hot water with Church authorities, who have suspended you and started an investigation into your actions and words. How do you respond to that?
al-Masih: It is an unfortunate fact that the Church is a misogynistic institution. There is nothing they hate more than an outspoken and powerful woman, especially one that criticizes their privileges. I have no doubt that if I were a man I would have gotten away with a slap on the wrist, at most. I can't say I am surprised as to how the Church is reacting to me, though I do thank them for the free publicity. I know that I am following my faith and the teachings of Our Lord, and that my political ideals are inspired by Lord Eliyahu, who Himself was a Communist. I will continue to follow my calling, and, God willing, one day I will succeed.