"Democracy is not a principle guided by an omnipresent hand." - Statsminister.Statsminister blasts World Congress Security Council Resolution 23; Slams nations in agreement of resolution.Statsminister Finn Nordhagen commenting on the Security Council's resolution 23.12th May, 4241International uproar has been generated out of the
World Congress Security Council Resolution 23. According to resolution, it proposed a more hands-on approach by the World Congress in the areas of the internal politics of individual nations. It proposed that the "World Congress play a role in assisting parliaments and decentralised local governance structures to enhance the checks and balances that allow democracy to thrive" , "offer electoral assistance and long-term support for electoral management bodies through the World Congress" and "recognise that when a Government attempts to undertake measures or policies which contradict World Congress or Security Council Resolutions, that the international community may decide to act upon it, by further Resolution." These provisions have caused international disagreement with various nations such as
Pontesi and
Rildanor condemning the resolution in the General Assembly and with
Dorvik,
Baltusia and
Hutori voting against the resolution in the Security Council.
Although the resolution has been derailed, the international community is still up in arms at the fact that members of the security council, an organ of the supposed "peace and democracy distributing" mechanism that is the World Congress, would attempt to become more hands on in the internal politics of the nations, specifically in an individual nation's election. Commentators international have blasted the Istalian and Luthorian delegation for their attempts to implement a world congress foothold into the affairs of a nation's internal decision-making. Statsminister Finn Nordhagen has come out and is joining the international community in condemning the resolution.
The World Congress is an international organisation established to promote global cooperation and stability. It is not shocking to this government that attempts were made to increase its omnipotence by attempting to establish a foothold into individual nations internal decision-making processes. It is poor and low to see the Security Council stoop-down this low and this bold in an attempt to have some form of inclusion into the democratic procedures of a nation. In reviewing this resolution,
as it develops, it begins to contradict itself in a major way. In its opening phase it states: democracy is a universal value based on the freely expressed will of people to determine their political, economic, social and cultural systems and their full participation in all aspects of their lives, this make a complete u-turn later on where it is stated:Does desire that the World Congress play a role in assisting parliaments and decentralised local governance structures to enhance the checks and balances that allow democracy to thrive. This is also a contradiction of the clause which states: Does oppose any attempt by a foreign power to interfere, influence, effect, change or manipulate the democratic elections of another nation. This accentuates the hypocritical nature of both the resolution and the hypocritical intentions of its creator. The heavy push for their hypocritical mindset is accentuated in the clause: Does offer electoral assistance and long-term support for electoral management bodies through the World Congress. But didn't earlier in this resolution it condemned other governments' involvement into the elections of another nation? Finally in conclusion to this poorly structured, one-sided, hypocritical screed, it states: Does recognise that when a Government attempts to undertake measures or policies which contradict World Congress or Security Council Resolutions, that the international community may decide to act upon it, by further Resolution. If this resolution had been approved, we would have been more justification to act upon the Security Council's hypocritical, contradictory mindset. It is a blessing that this resolution was not passed.
In response to international condemnation and the subsequent derailment of the resolution, the
Istalian delegation went on a screed, pitifully attempting to chastise the international community for "not caring about the security and protection of human life and dignity." Rildanorian Foreign Minister Cyrille Rodier blasted the Istalian delegation's walkout, labelling it as "melodramatic stunt". Statsminister Nordhagen, ripped into the Istalian delegation, highlighting the Istalian government and the Security Council's attempts at systematically coaxing the international community into allowing for the World Congress to become involvement in the democratically sensitive process known as internal elections. He stated that at-least the Luthorian delegation had the pride and maturity to accept the fact that the resolution was not going to pass and moved on.
It appears that the Istalian Republic is the Security Council's little princess, she gets whatever wants, whenever she wants and when things don't her way, a tantrum accentuating her pitiful nature ensues. The Istalian delegation launched a screed against the international community attempting to chastise it for not wanting to "protect citizens against totalitarian regime" and for not "caring" about the security and protection of the human life and dignity. I tell you this, the international community cares about the protection of human dignity and democracy and it seen in the derailment and international condemnation of this attempting by the Security Council to become involved in a nation's election. That is what caring for human dignity and democracy is, ensuring that each nation is protected against attempts of this nature. It goes to show that certain members of the security council will use anything as a legislative magic-wand in-order to push a one-side, contradictory agenda. The World Congress' involvement in the sensitive electoral process will be the doom of a free-thinking, independent, democratic process. Attempting to have the World Congress increase its omnipresence and omnipotence whilst becoming involved in the democratic procedures of a nation is a testimony of the intentions of certain nations of the Security Council. Attempting to become "hands-on" involved in the democratic proceedings of an another nation is not going to protection human life and dignity more than it is going to systematically destroy the free-will and free-thought of a democratic population. Democracy is not a principle guided by an omnipresent hand. The Istalian delegation and the Istalian Republic could continue with its nonsensical, vexatious, frivolous and incompetently-fuelled screed. But i can assure you, that stupidity-driven, one-sides, melodramatic screed will fall on deaf ears. At-least the Luthorian delegation took the derailment of the resolution like mature individuals and moved on.
This could possibly signal the gradual deterioration of Kazulian-Istalian diplomatic relations. Relations which have been breaking-down over the last couple of months, with the most recent crack in their relations being the
Statsminister's call for a renewed approach to the MRSF. When asked to comment on the possibility of a break-down in Kazulian-Istalian diplomatic relations, Statsminister Nordhagen stated that he does not intend on apologising for brutally administering the truth. Before entering the Stortinget for an important cabinet briefing, Nordhagen stated that he intends on promoting true, classic democracy, unlike the diet, decaffeinated and proceeded democracy being promoted by the Istalian republic and other security council members.