Re: Kazulias Nyheter
Posted: Thu Apr 20, 2017 12:46 am
"The Military Should have no role in enforcing economic interests." Chief of Defence Staff
Chief of Defence Staff sent to Istalian Military Administration in Wantuni; Questions intentions of Military Administration.
Chief of Defence Staff Lt. General Henning Sivertsen speaks with Istalian Lieutenant Colonel Marian Ibn Malik, in the Military Administrative Region.
2nd July, 4198
In response to the Istalian Government's move to establish a Military Administration in the region of Kalopia-Mossavi as a means of what they call "managing a scandal", Chief of Defence Staff Lt. General Henning Sivertsen has been sent to the Military Administration region to speak with its administrator/governor, General Romeo with respect to the Istalian Armed Force's involvement in administrating economic affairs in a country virtually in anarchy. The response by the Istalian Government comes after elements of the Revolutionary Front of Workers for the Liberation of Wantuni (an organisation believed to be of a terrorist persona) have been identified to be present in the area. Apart from the presence of the RFWLW in Wantuni, slavery operations by a company known as Eliomax has also spurred the response of the Istalian Government.
With respect to the use of the Istalian Armed Forces as a means of "administrating economic interests of the Istalian Republic" Chief of Defence Staff Sivertsen had this to say:
When reminded of the statement that the various Istalian companies in Wantuni act as a quasi system of governance within their respective regions. Lt. General Sivertsen stated that the statement (apart from combating terrorism and presumably administering peace) the Istalian Armed Forces should have no role with respect to economic governance and advancement.
It is uncertain whether the presumed military administration would be centred on economic interests and personal goal, however, Director-General for International Cooperation Erlend Weberg stated that the Istalian Government should instead of using the military administration for economic interests protection and personal operation, should convert the region into a Civil Administration and begin the nation building process with the cooperation of the various local community leaders. Lt. General Sivertsen is expected to return to Skalm with a full report for the Statsminister and King Arvid.
Chief of Defence Staff sent to Istalian Military Administration in Wantuni; Questions intentions of Military Administration.
Chief of Defence Staff Lt. General Henning Sivertsen speaks with Istalian Lieutenant Colonel Marian Ibn Malik, in the Military Administrative Region.
2nd July, 4198
In response to the Istalian Government's move to establish a Military Administration in the region of Kalopia-Mossavi as a means of what they call "managing a scandal", Chief of Defence Staff Lt. General Henning Sivertsen has been sent to the Military Administration region to speak with its administrator/governor, General Romeo with respect to the Istalian Armed Force's involvement in administrating economic affairs in a country virtually in anarchy. The response by the Istalian Government comes after elements of the Revolutionary Front of Workers for the Liberation of Wantuni (an organisation believed to be of a terrorist persona) have been identified to be present in the area. Apart from the presence of the RFWLW in Wantuni, slavery operations by a company known as Eliomax has also spurred the response of the Istalian Government.
With respect to the use of the Istalian Armed Forces as a means of "administrating economic interests of the Istalian Republic" Chief of Defence Staff Sivertsen had this to say:
I do not believe in the pretext that a military should police its population, nor do i believe in the concept that a military should be involve in governing the operations and affairs of companies. A military or any person relating to a military/armed force should never mention the words economic military administration in the same sentence.
When reminded of the statement that the various Istalian companies in Wantuni act as a quasi system of governance within their respective regions. Lt. General Sivertsen stated that the statement (apart from combating terrorism and presumably administering peace) the Istalian Armed Forces should have no role with respect to economic governance and advancement.
The route this government, more-so its military should have taken, is one that is centred on nation building. With a nation with no formal government, I believe that economic interests should not be the focus of this presumed administration, instead qualitative nation building reinforced by peace and stability promotion. It is very clear that this armed force contingent was mainly sent into the country to protect the nation's natural gas exploitation operations in the nation. I have no problem with this armed contingent being dispatched to combat slavery and terrorism solely, however, it is a separate and quite nonsensical case for this military contingent to be used as a means of propping up the economic interests of the Istalian Republic. The Military Should have no role in enforcing economic interests.
It is uncertain whether the presumed military administration would be centred on economic interests and personal goal, however, Director-General for International Cooperation Erlend Weberg stated that the Istalian Government should instead of using the military administration for economic interests protection and personal operation, should convert the region into a Civil Administration and begin the nation building process with the cooperation of the various local community leaders. Lt. General Sivertsen is expected to return to Skalm with a full report for the Statsminister and King Arvid.