The new Party President asks Senators to aggressively adopt his new platform
A Solvernment News Network! Report
RHEGIUM - If there's one notable difference between Federal Independent Party President Christopher Lefolst and former Party President Barry Elridge, it's their approach to legislation.
The recently elected Party President has made known his desire for the party to become vocal on issues of legislation and focal points the party has been known for in the past. Speaking before a chapter of the IBEW, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Lefolst declared that the party would no longer idly sit by and simply reject legislation it disliked. Rather, he said, it would take an affirmative role in proactively creating new legislation that protects the party's interest groups and constituency base.
"You've seen for too long a party, once known as the lion of the Senate for its aggressive, constant demand to vote in new laws popular with the people, now become apathetic with policy creation," said Lefolst. "That time is over and done."
Our party has struggled with useless division at a time of crisis in Solentia. The economy is bleeding jobs with runaway privatization and hijacked markets by invasive foreign corporations. This is the time for us to pick up our things, get the picture together, and emerge the country's leading political force once again. - Party President Christopher Lefolst
Many of the party's most supportive bases are hoping that a Lefolst presidency will create a stronger party on the national scene where it has gradually dwindled in strength over the past few elections. Conflict between the party's traditional labor base and its more recent welcome of fiscal organizations as a key interest group has caused some friction between party members. The party's Supreme Presidential primary in 2936 is cited as the climactic moment in which Russ Donahue and Jeremy Frawl, appealing to two different bases, fought one another in a close race and refused to seek the other's interest group's support. Ultimately Donahue won the nomination with the fiscal caucus' support, but went on to lose the general election in which organized labor was unsympathetic to Donahue's campaign.
Lefolst's strongest supportes claim that his track record shows he is able to bring competing sides together, something he has already done by appointing both labor representatives and fiscal group representatives on the party's electoral board. He has also urged the Federal Independent Senatorial Committee to consist of both groups to ensure unity at the ballot box. But his most recent prodding of the party to accept and embrace TASA, the Third Agenda Series Acts, has established a firm grounding of the party in its bases.
Criticized by some in the political arena, Lefolst has generally brushed off attacks by the Conservative Party of Solentia and the Utilitarian Party of Solentia. In a letter between Lefolst and an unnamed UPS representative, Lefolst wrote scathingly of the current coalition government.
"If the FIP will not defend the Solentians when its help is most needed, Solentia deserves better than the FIP," the UPS representative writes.
To this Lefolst responded: "Then you are right. The Solentia you continue to imagine deserves to be without this party. But that is not the Solentia we live in. Enjoy working in the authoritarian coalition. I just hope that the CPS doesn't pull the strings of its UPS puppet too hard. In previous times, the CPS has strangled many of its pawns by doing such."