Apparently. Spending money to protect the environment is wasted money. Investing money to develop our nations recycling programs is also wasted. And I am not even going to talk about the money we have to spend to establish the Hunting and fishery, because that's wasted money too. Yeah apparently. Hunters will know, by magic, what's the perfect number of animals they have the right to hunt each years. So, there is no way we'Ll be able to to respond the recents demand for funds that we have received. because its a waste of money they say. The minister of environment only have 7 500 000 000 BLD in hand, and sadly. the spending we have to do to establish recyc-Baltusia, since it would be illegal to not spent this money as we are ordered by the congress, would cost more then 25 000 000 000 BLD. The cost of operations are not high, its just that we start with nothing, and we have to build it up. so Sorry, but we can't do miracles and wonder. So, i guess we are going to be illegal for some times. I don't think the other parties share our goals regarding the environment, we are not aiming to preserve it, our aim is to improve it. And when we work on that, we can't do an Half-job to save money, we must go all in...
No, effort should be spared to protect the environment, we need a plan to recycling Cardboard, one to recycling glass, one to recycle metal and we can't mix them. We should never mix glass and Cardboard or Glass and metal, Entreprise that ask for metal do not want glasses in their components. Also, we need to realise that we have big cities, and so we cannot serve by offering a small plan, we need an adequate plan for our population. Our plan is to make every single household in Baltusia have access to a Bin for each type of recyclable metarials. after that we'll begin to worry about making sure resident put their glass waste in their Glass bin and their metal waste in their metal Bins, and we'll be able to worry about what type of fines, those who do not respect the rules could face, but right now. We need to start somewhere and that is where we should start.
When I was contacted by the Republican National Committee to Chair our Party's election going into the next cycle at first I thought they were out of their mind. But it has become clear from the first year and a half of the Fairnsworth Administration we have a dysfunctional Congress and that clearly the Democrats have little to no clue what to do with their own Majority. They control both Houses and Blue House and yet have nothing of note done and ahve open Cabinet fights within their own Party on how to accomplish anything for this nation. I would be admonishing my duty and my office if I didn't step up to help coordinate Republican efforts to return common sense and stability to Congress and make sure that the Democrats don't have another four years to either muck it up, or do nothing with a majority they clear have no idea what to do.
I have reached out to my colleagues in the Nationalist Caucus and the Libertarian Party to ensure we provide a united front against the leftists that would seek to undermine our Republic and to ensure we put the best candidate forward in the Republican Primaries for President and we have the best damn slate going against the Democrats in the House and Senate.
"Ladies and Gentlemen of The Libertarian Party, Twelve years ago, we commited ourselves to forming a distinct third party dedicated solely to the defense of Individual Rights, Private Property, and Free
Enterprise and under my leadership contributed to the peace and prosperity of our noble Republic but alas in today's political climate Baltusia is suffering like a cancer patient on the highway to hell and you might ask yourselves why. Baltusia is suffering because the red menace is here and in power destroying piece by piece all that is right and well with this nation of ours. The time has come to join hands with our political allies and be as one while stay true to our beliefs. We will not compromise I promise you that."
Yes, genereally I believe that the state would be better then private entrepreneurs in many areas, because the state would not be motivated by gain alone. Hoverer, I am not saying that entrepreneurs are soulless monsters, whose only goal in their life would be to sit on a enermous pile of money and laugh at the miserable world bellow us. You are human, and so you are free to make good choice or bad choice, and we can't be certain that private entreprise will always make the good choice. You can choose to view free entreprise as a free organisation, but we view them as a small dictatorship, where there is one person or a small group in position of autority and whose going to decision without any other balanced then other small dictatorship. That is what we hope to change. We need to be certain that such organisation have respect for the consummers and have respect for the environment, and we can't do by invoking the spirit of free market. Like I said, since is possible for private entrepreneurs, we are always going to make a place for private business.
The libertarian recently branded us as a Red Menace, we can assure you that is not us, for we would not be open the rights of homosexuals, nor be open to polygamists, and we would not open to medias. the libertarian are imaginating a REd scare to put fear inside people.
Need we remind the PLCA that our country already enforces strict environmental protections and regulations? The UDP is all for the environment, but this asks to funnel billions of dollars into mandatory recycling efforts, efforts that we feel could simply be accomplished by the private sector, along with moderate regulation of course. This is simply just asking to divert funds from areas which direly need it to something that is already in good shape. We vehemently vote no and encourage the rest of our party to reject this negligent spending.
It has become increasingly clear over the past two years that the only thing "united" about the United Democratic Party is their name, they have open fight between Cabinet Members and their own Party Members in Congress, and we have yet to hear anything from the President on this matter, as though he's at a loss for what to do. If this is the best the Democrats can offer Baltusians I have serious reservations over whether or they not they should even be allowed to govern and I'm sure the Baltusian voter will respond very positively to our simple message of lower taxes, less government and most important; Unity.
I believe my colleague Senator Pickens has already take that one to rest and it shows from the entirety of the Democratic Party is voting it down in droves. What I find amusing is that clearly the Farnsworth Administration is extremely dysfunctional; when the Environment Secretary couldn't get money from the Treasury for her hair brained scheme she goes behind the back of both the Secretary and the President himself and asks for the money directly from Congress. I wonder how the Secretary of the Treasury and the President would have reacted if it had been to pass that they need to pony up an additional twelve and a half billion additional dollars. Heh, "United" indeed.
You are admitting that of the twenty billion you will be given, should this Congress approve your Authorization Bill that you will set aside 193,240,000 Dollars for the operations of the Department of Environment and Tourism. Are you openly admitting to this Congress and this Committee in particular that you only need, 2.6% of your total operating budget, that this Congress gives you in annual spending, to physically enforce environment and waste regulations, protect the environment and promote our tourism industry as is part of your mandate. Are you admitting to this Committee, that you only need a fraction of the money currently assigned to you to do your job?
If that's the case, Madam Secretary, why in the dickens are we giving you seven and a half billion dollars in taxpayer money every year, if from the sounds of it, two hundred million will do for all your needs? Again I ask, are you short changing yourself, or are you deliberately lying to this Committee on the needs of your department?
As for the issue of the President and the Secretary of the Treasury, if you do not feel supported by the administration, why are you still apart of it? Are you willing to resign your position, or do you plan on staying in a Cabinet that evidently, you do not even get along with?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests