Solentian condemnation of Karav expansionism

World events, conflicts, conferences and visits from all over.

Re: Solentian condemnation of Karav expansionism

Postby Siggon Kristov » Thu Aug 23, 2012 2:33 pm

In a letter to the Solentian News, Prince Kristov III wrote:
It is obvious that the Solentian government prefers a despotic regime in Gaduridos, rather than one that promotes liberal democracy in the form of a republic, allowing people to elect their head of state. At the same time, the Clarkes want to deny being monarchist pigs in Solentia? Everyone knows they only forced the Kansars into exile because the Kansars were a more respected family. As soon as the Kansars left, they had no competition and their dictatorship could prevail, especially since the international community is constantly sold the lie of "democracy" that the Solentian government tells. You say you have elections, but who counts the votes, and which votes are counted? Election fraud in this "democracy" isn't impossible. In fact, it's highly likely.

We overthrew the Adamsonite regime and liberated Gaduridos from the House of Adamson; members of both the ATR and the IML supported this move, as neither recognised the Adamsons as the rightful rulers of Gaduridos.

Our liberation of Gaduridos is a good thing. Solentia, and the CfL, should try to find out what's actually happening before running off their mouths about it.

Gaduridos doesn't need to trade with Solentia anyways. Neither Beluzia nor Gaduridos needs Solentia. We would advise the Clarkes to stop overestimating their significance.

And how hypocritical, of a government that promotes "freedom" to ban their companies from choosing who to trade with. I shouldn't even say the government; it's just every puppet who becomes the Supreme President. Did Solentia's legislature even approve of economic sanctions? Or did the dictator just order them to happen like that? The Supreme President really just has the power to tell everyone what to do? That is not freedom. That is not free trade. That is dictatorship disguised as democracy to attract inernational support for a fake "Congress for Liberty" which we all know is just an organisation to attract more puppets for the Clarke Junta. I don't see the "Liberty" in organising international armed forces to serve the interests of the elite few members, who call themselves the "Executive Council" when not all members even with the concentration of power. Views have been expressed, against the existence of such a council, but they, like real voters in Solentia, have been ignored. It doesn't matter how the council was elected; the point is that power is being concentrated for the sake of promoting the interests of an elite few who make other members feel inferior.

The Karavs are not even in power in Gaduridos; we are simply reforming the country and allowing the democratic process to take its course. As soon as another eligible government steps forward, we will welcome it, as long as its policies do not harm the liberties of the people, or their image.
Check out my latest Particracy project, and feel free to discuss it in the forums.
Siggon Kristov
 
Posts: 3206
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 2:35 am

Re: Solentian condemnation of Karav expansionism

Postby markbryja » Wed Oct 03, 2012 1:55 am

Solentia, let us reach peace. The United Socialist Workers Party proposes a peace agreement between Beluzia and Solentia that will lift the trade embargo and help both economies grow. There is no need for hostilities,we can resolve this peacefully and both sides can recognize each other. Let us talk.
markbryja
 
Posts: 35
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 9:30 pm

Re: Solentian condemnation of Karav expansionism

Postby Siggon Kristov » Sun Oct 07, 2012 3:29 pm

Solentia, let us reach peace. The United Socialist Workers Party proposes a peace agreement between Beluzia and Solentia that will lift the trade embargo and help both economies grow. There is no need for hostilities,we can resolve this peacefully and both sides can recognize each other. Let us talk.


You have never had any political power in Beluzia.
What right do you have to speak on the matter after epic failures in the elections?

You have never had any position or authority in regards to policy-making. Who do you mean when you use the word "us" in your statement? Who are "we" in the statement?

You're representing yourself, not the Beluz government. You're no-one to the Beluz government. The people never voted to give you any power. You don't represent them; you don't have the authority to make foreign policy.
Check out my latest Particracy project, and feel free to discuss it in the forums.
Siggon Kristov
 
Posts: 3206
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 2:35 am

Previous

Return to World Events

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests