Page 1 of 1
E-Democracy / E-Government
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Sun Aug 24, 2014 1:51 am
by frantania
Name: E-Democracy / E-Government
Law / Policy Category: Civil
Options:
1: No democracy participation via the internet
2: Information of the government or agency websites
3: Procedures and formalities on the internet (ID card, etc)
4: Indirect Democratic (e-petition, etc)
5: direct democracy (E-Activism, e-participation, e-voting)
6: all equity options
Effects:
I will add to this later, but I'm all ears for now.
Re: E-Democracy / E-Government
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Sun Aug 24, 2014 5:54 pm
by Darkylightytwo
Just a quesiton, the number 6, does it simply include all the others mentionned option ?, man, I would vote yes on that.
Re: E-Democracy / E-Government
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Sun Aug 24, 2014 9:45 pm
by frantania
Do you think I should delete the other options?
Re: E-Democracy / E-Government
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
by Darkylightytwo
I was just wondering if 6 = 2, 3, 4 and 5 at the same time.<
I think it is good, hoverer, I doubt the moderator or the admin will accept any new laws
Re: E-Democracy / E-Government
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Sat Feb 21, 2015 6:38 pm
by Sir Thomas Hill
I really like this one, is there any chance we could do this?
Re: E-Democracy / E-Government
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Thu Jul 23, 2015 12:13 am
by Aquinas
I like this one, but I think it needs to be more specific.
Hmm...
Name: Electronic petitions ("e-petitions").
Law / Policy Category: Administrative
1. E-petitions are banned.
2. E-petitions are legal but the government has no specific policy on responding to them.
3. The government must formally respond to an e-petition if it receives more than a certain number of signatures.
4. The legislature must set aside time to debate an e-petition if it receives more than a certain number of signatures.
More radical options, like allowing e-petitions with enough signatures to call referendums or even pass laws would be exciting, but probably unworkable, as Particracy cannot really simulate those things. Plus they would probably have to count as constitutional amendments (requiring a 2/3rds majority), which we are not able to add to the game.
Any thoughts? I'm still thinking about it...
Re: E-Democracy / E-Government
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Tue Aug 04, 2015 6:15 pm
by Darkylightytwo
what are we still waiting for here ?
I* suggest the law be added already
Re: E-Democracy / E-Government
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Mon Dec 28, 2015 12:19 pm
by Wland
A very nice idea.
Re: E-Democracy / E-Government
![Post Post](./styles/prosilver/imageset/icon_post_target.gif)
Posted:
Sat Jul 16, 2016 8:26 pm
by toro42
Are we gonna do this? It looks good.