Page 1 of 2

Eugenics

PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 1:51 pm
by leroy
Name: Government policy on eugenics
Law/Policy Category: Health

Options:
1. The government does not engage in eugenics.
2. Persons with undesirable traits (e.g. mental or physical illness, race, etc.) are not allowed to reproduce.
3. Persons with undesirable traits (e.g. mental or physical illness, race, etc.) are actively exterminated.
4. This is left for the local governments to decide upon.

Effects:
1. No real effect, maybe an increase in civil rights.
2. Decrease in civil rights. Increase in government responsibility.
3. Significant decrease in civil rights. Increase in government responsibility.
4. Decrease in civil rights. Increase in devolution.

Re: Eugenics

PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 3:50 pm
by leroy
Hello. There are two types of eugenics that particracy players may want to partake in, so I have updated my proposals.

Name: Government policy on negative eugenics
Law/Policy Category: Health

Options:
1. The government does not engage in negative eugenics.
2. Persons with undesirable traits (e.g. mental or physical illness, race, etc.) are prevented from reproducing.
3. Persons with undesirable traits (e.g. mental or physical illness, race, etc.) are actively exterminated.
4. This is left for the local governments to decide upon.

Effects:
1. No real effect, maybe an increase in civil rights.
2. Decrease in civil rights. Increase in government responsibility.
3. Significant decrease in civil rights. Increase in government responsibility.
4. Decrease in civil rights. Increase in devolution.


Name: Government policy on positive eugenics
Law/Policy Category: Health

Options:
1. The government does not engage in positive eugenics.
2. Persons with desirable traits are encouraged to reproduce, but the government undertakes no actions to ensure this.
3. Person with desirable traits are encouraged to reproduce, and the government undertakes actions to ensure this.
4. This is left for the local governments to decide upon.

Effects:
1. No real effect, maybe an increase in civil rights.
2. Decrease in civil rights.
3. Decrease in civil rights. Increase in government responsibility.
4. Increase in devolution.

Re: Eugenics

PostPosted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 8:45 am
by GreekIdiot
Actually this is an awesome idea that could help dictatorships and authoritarian regimes use more roleplaying ideas with this.

Some tweaks, though:

Name: Government policy with regards to negative eugenics.
Law/Policy Category: Civil Rights

Options:
1. The government does not engage in negative eugenics.
2. Citizens with undesirable traits (e.g. mental or physical illness, race, etc.) are forbidden to reproduce by law.
3. Citizens with undesirable traits (e.g. mental or physical illness, race, etc.) are actively exterminated.
4. This is left for the local governments to decide upon.

Effects:
1. No real effect, maybe an increase in civil rights.
2. Decrease in civil rights. Increase in government responsibility.
3. Significant decrease in civil rights. Increase in government responsibility.
4. Increase in devolution.

-------------
Name: Government policy with regards to positive eugenics.
Law/Policy Category: Civil Rights

Options:
1. The government does not engage in positive eugenics.
2. Citizens with desirable traits are encouraged to reproduce, without any active government involvement in this matter.
3. Citizens with desirable traits are encouraged to reproduce, and the government undertakes actions to ensure this by raising their class status, through funds and other forms of active support.
4. This is left for the local governments to decide upon.

Effects:
1. No real effect, maybe an increase in civil rights.
2. Decrease in civil rights.
3. Decrease in civil rights. Increase in government responsibility.
4. Increase in devolution.

Re: Eugenics

PostPosted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 9:37 am
by Amazeroth
Overall a good law, but with one minor flaw:

2. Citizens with desirable traits are encouraged to reproduce, without any active government involvement in this matter.

should be

2. Citizens with desirable traits are encouraged to reproduce.


Encouraging always means active involvement, usually through tax refunds or something.

Re: Eugenics

PostPosted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 9:52 am
by GreekIdiot
Amazeroth wrote:Encouraging always means active involvement, usually through tax refunds or something.


Indeed, so in definition, the government encourages them to reproduce but does not get actively involved in the process with tax refunds and stuff and like that.

Re: Eugenics

PostPosted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 12:05 pm
by leroy
Name: Government policy with regards to negative eugenics.
Law/Policy Category: Health/Civil Rights

Options:
1. The government does not engage in negative eugenics. (Default)
2. Citizens with undesirable traits (e.g. mental or physical illness, race, etc.) are forbidden to reproduce by law.
3. Citizens with undesirable traits (e.g. mental or physical illness, race, etc.) are actively exterminated.
4. This is left for the local governments to decide upon.

Effects:
1. No real effect, maybe an increase in civil rights.
2. Decrease in civil rights. Increase in government responsibility.
3. Significant decrease in civil rights. Increase in government responsibility.
4. Increase in devolution.


Name: Government policy with regards to positive eugenics.
Law/Policy Category: Health/Civil Rights

Options:
1. The government does not engage in positive eugenics. (Default)
2. Citizens with desirable traits are encouraged to reproduce, but without any active government involvement in the matter.
3. Citizens with desirable traits are encouraged to reproduce, and the government ensures this by raising their class status, through funds and other forms of active support.
4. This is left for the local governments to decide upon.

Effects:
1. No real effect, maybe an increase in civil rights.
2. Decrease in civil rights.
3. Decrease in civil rights. Increase in government responsibility.
4. Increase in devolution.


Some people would argue that this is an health issue since eugenics is implemented to improve collective health.

Re: Eugenics

PostPosted: Mon May 02, 2011 9:19 am
by Amazeroth
I think most would agree that allowing/forbidding to reproduce is a civil rights issue.

Re: Eugenics

PostPosted: Mon May 02, 2011 10:09 am
by GreekIdiot
As it contains both, let's put it in the health section, seeing it has fewer proposals than the civil rights section.

Re: Eugenics

PostPosted: Mon May 09, 2011 12:39 am
by Eryk
Implement it, Implement it! It would help with RP in terms of genocide..

Re: Eugenics

PostPosted: Mon May 09, 2011 1:46 am
by Darvian
If this is finished, post it in it's final draft form in the pertinent thread.