Policy on regional legislatures.

Propose and review new legislative variables for the game.

Policy on regional legislatures.

Postby Farsun » Mon Aug 13, 2012 9:32 pm

Name of the Law/Policy: Policy on regional legislatures.
Law/Policy Category: Administration

Options:
1. Regional legislatures exist and are appointed by the head of state.
2. Regional legislatures exist and are appointed by the head of government.
3. Regional legislatures exist and are elected. (default)
4. Regional legislatures do not exist.

Effects:
1. Medium Increase in centralization.
2. Small Increase in centralization.
3. No effect.
4. Massive increase in centralization.
Last edited by Farsun on Mon Aug 13, 2012 9:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Dorvish Social Nationalist Party
OOC Administrator of the Artanian Union & Bureaucrat of the Particracy Wiki
Farsun
 
Posts: 2113
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:47 pm
Location: New York, United States.

Re: Policy on regional legislatures.

Postby EEL123 » Mon Aug 13, 2012 9:38 pm

Having no regional legislature could hardly increase devolution. It would be the biggest increase in centralisation because the functions of local government would be given to the nationa government. And the same for you proposal about governors.
House of Razama
EEL123
 
Posts: 4442
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2012 11:38 pm
Location: Razamid Caliphate (Kafuristan)

Re: Policy on regional legislatures.

Postby Farsun » Mon Aug 13, 2012 9:45 pm

EEL123 wrote:Having no regional legislature could hardly increase devolution. It would be the biggest increase in centralisation because the functions of local government would be given to the nationa government. And the same for you proposal about governors.


Ya know, I realize that now. #fail.
Dorvish Social Nationalist Party
OOC Administrator of the Artanian Union & Bureaucrat of the Particracy Wiki
Farsun
 
Posts: 2113
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:47 pm
Location: New York, United States.

Re: Policy on regional legislatures.

Postby lombas » Mon Aug 13, 2012 9:46 pm

In Mordusia, the law stipulates that the provincial outcome in general elections provides the result for the seats in the regional councils (so if party X gets 18 seats in province Y, it wil get 18 seats in Y's council as well). The Governorship is held by the party having the most of seats, regardless if the party has a majority or not.
The Agrarian Party of the Freestate of Mordusia
Defending free trade, freethought, open borders, neutrality and Mordusian heritage since 2171
lombas
 
Posts: 143
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:46 pm

Re: Policy on regional legislatures.

Postby Farsun » Tue Aug 14, 2012 3:21 am

lombas wrote:In Mordusia, the law stipulates that the provincial outcome in general elections provides the result for the seats in the regional councils (so if party X gets 18 seats in province Y, it wil get 18 seats in Y's council as well). The Governorship is held by the party having the most of seats, regardless if the party has a majority or not.


What option do you suggest? I am struggling to find the political terms to put that in.
Dorvish Social Nationalist Party
OOC Administrator of the Artanian Union & Bureaucrat of the Particracy Wiki
Farsun
 
Posts: 2113
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:47 pm
Location: New York, United States.

Re: Policy on regional legislatures.

Postby Leonardo222 » Tue Aug 21, 2012 2:11 pm

In my opinion this is covered by your suggestion, because this would be a new question and therefore a new law.

I think it is good like it is, but why bring an appointment of the head of state more decentralization then by a head of government?

New Question: Appointment of chiefs of regional governments

viewtopic.php?f=21&t=4758 (appointment of governors)
Leonardo222
 
Posts: 264
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 7:01 pm

Re: Policy on regional legislatures.

Postby Siggon Kristov » Tue Aug 21, 2012 3:12 pm

Farsun wrote:Name of the Law/Policy: Policy on regional legislatures.
Law/Policy Category: Administration

Options:
1. Regional legislatures exist and are appointed by the head of state.
2. Regional legislatures exist and are appointed by the head of government.
3. Regional legislatures exist and are elected. (default)
4. Regional legislatures do not exist.

Effects:
1. Medium Increase in centralization.
2. Small Increase in centralization.
3. No effect.
4. Massive increase in centralization.


I think #3 should be increase in devolution.
Check out my latest Particracy project, and feel free to discuss it in the forums.
Siggon Kristov
 
Posts: 3206
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 2:35 am

Re: Policy on regional legislatures.

Postby EEL123 » Tue Aug 21, 2012 8:30 pm

I do not see how being appointed by the HoG is any less centralised than being appointed by the HoS.
House of Razama
EEL123
 
Posts: 4442
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2012 11:38 pm
Location: Razamid Caliphate (Kafuristan)

Re: Policy on regional legislatures.

Postby Friedrich » Wed Aug 22, 2012 6:15 am

Looks fine to me. I suggest that this should be considered a constitutional issue and that a change of setting should have a 2/3 majority to pass.
Friedrich
 
Posts: 192
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 6:51 am

Re: Policy on regional legislatures.

Postby Leonardo222 » Wed Aug 22, 2012 3:27 pm

I don't think that should be a constiutional issue or the default options must be changed.
Leonardo222
 
Posts: 264
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 7:01 pm

Next

Return to Laws

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests