Wildcat strikes

[EEL123]

Name of the Law/Policy: Legality of wildcat strikes
Law/Policy Category: Economics

Options:
1) Wildcat strikes are legal.
2) Wildcat strikes are legal, but wildcat strikers are not entitled to legal protections enjoyed by other strikers.
3) Wildcat strikes are illegal.
4) This issue is decided by local governments.

Effects:
1) Small decrease in gov. responsibilities, small decrease in regulation, increase in civil rights.
2) Decrease in gov. responsibilities, decrease in regulation.
3) Increase in gov. responsibilities, increase in regulation, small decrease in civil rights.
4) Increase in devolution.

[Afrocentric]

What are wildcat strikes?

[EEL123]

What are wildcat strikes?

When a worker strikes without permission from his union.

[Afrocentric]

What are wildcat strikes?

When a worker strikes without permission from his union.

Okay, thanks for telling me. I think this is a good proposal.

I support it.

[EEL123]

I think this is a good proposal. I support it.

Have you looked at my other industrial relations laws?

[Jalal Al-e-Ahmad]

WILDCAT STRIKES
Are a quite interesting and specific law topic.

In this one, perhaps you should make the difference between Public and Private sector strikes more pronounced. Like, workers in the public sector, or in key industries, cannot have wildcat strikes whereas private sector/united cafe' barristas 402 unions can wildcat all over.

But you know, generally, most laws clamp down hard on wildcat strikes. It'd be strange to allow them slightly if at all, it seems it'd be an all or nothing kind of law. Allowed, or not allowed. Only two options.

So says me, though.

[Aquinas]

This is a good proposal. We might also consider a separate proposal for "lock-outs", which are situations where an employer shuts out workers from their workplace and doesn't pay them for a period in order to exert leverage over wage negotiations.

[EEL123]

We might also consider a separate proposal for "lock-outs"

Alright, will do.