Policy on incest

Propose and review new legislative variables for the game.

Policy on incest

Postby drew pickles » Mon Mar 10, 2014 4:30 pm

you should make a policy option to allow/disallow incest. include options such as: leave up to local juristictions, only siblings and cousins close in age, allow incest but disallow incest marriage, not criminalized after 18, require marriage counseling if seeking marriage, and completely illegal.
drew pickles
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2014 3:17 am

Re: Policy on incest

Postby EEL123 » Tue Mar 11, 2014 9:42 am

It's a good idea, but according to game rules, submission must be formatted as follows: (you can follow the link) viewtopic.php?f=21&t=2353
House of Razama
EEL123
 
Posts: 4442
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2012 11:38 pm
Location: Razamid Caliphate (Kafuristan)

Re: Policy on incest

Postby Darkylightytwo » Fri Jul 04, 2014 12:12 am

Name of the Law/Policy: Policy on Incest
Law/Policy Catagory: Moral

Options:
1. Incest is Illegal
2. Incest is Illegal but not prosecuted
3. Only heterosexual incest is legal
4. Incest is Legal
5. Policy on incest if left to the Locals governments.

Effects:
1 .Large increase in conservative leaning
2. Small increase in conservative leaning
3. Small increase in permissive leaning
4. Large increase in permissive leaning
5. Increase in Devolution

this is just an exemple.
Darkylightytwo
 
Posts: 803
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2014 6:27 am

Re: Policy on incest

Postby UniSocAll » Mon Jul 28, 2014 2:19 am

This is a good proposal. I might add a sixth option being: "The Government has no policy on incest"

And I would fix it like this:
Options:
1. All incest is Illegal
2. All incest is Illegal but not prosecuted, only fined
3. Only heterosexual incest is legal by two consenting adult
4. Consenting adults participating in incest is legal
5. Policy on incest if left to the Locals governments
6. The Government has no policy on incest

Effects:
1. Morality: Conservative ++ | Gov Responsibilities: Big Gov ++ | Civil Rights: Restrictive ++ | Centralisation: Unitarsm +
2. Morality: Conservative + | Gov Responsibilities: Big Gov + | Civil Rights: Restrictive ++ | Centralisation: Unitarsm +
3. Gov Responsibilities: Big Gov + | Civil: Restrictive + | Religion: Fanatic ++ | Centralisation: Unitarism +
4. Morality: Progressive ++ | Gov Responsibilities: Big Gov ++ | Civil: Permissive + | Centralisation: Unitarsm +
5. Centralisation: Devolution + | Gov Responsibilities: Small Gov + |
6. Gov Responsibilities: Small Gov ++ | Civil: Permissive ++
[IAN] International Airwaves Network [IAN]
Like Music To Your Ears | Connecting Communities

Alliance of Terran Republics
User avatar
UniSocAll
 
Posts: 846
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 8:49 am
Location: In your fantasies.

Re: Policy on incest

Postby Hugh Green » Tue Aug 05, 2014 5:35 pm

The effects on this are a bit odd. It isn't that morally conservative or "big government", by the standards of the average voter, to want to make incest illegal...
Active Party: FinEgaDef Kaj (FinEquaDef Platform), Republic of Cobura

Inactive Parties:
Front Rawlsienne, Lourenne
Social Congress, Republic of Cobura
Hugh Green
 
Posts: 186
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:08 am

Re: Policy on incest

Postby Darkylightytwo » Fri Aug 08, 2014 6:00 am

Got to agree, incest policies should not concern government responsabilies, or, not that much.
Just conservative on Moral or permissive.
and of course, unitarism a little bit, like most laws.

So this is the final draft

Name of the Law/Policy: Policy on Incest
Law/Policy Catagory: Moral

Options:
1. All incest is Illegal
2. All incest is Illegal but not prosecuted, only fined
3. Only heterosexual incest is legal by two consenting adult
4. Consenting adults participating in incest is legal
5. Policy on incest if left to the Locals governments
6. The Government has no policy on incest

Effects:
1. Morality: Conservative ++ | Civil Rights: Restrictive ++ | Centralisation: Unitarsm +
2. Morality: Conservative + | Civil Rights: Restrictive + | Centralisation: Unitarsm +
3. Morality: Progressive + | Civil: Restrictive + | Centralisation: Unitarism +
4. Morality: Progressive ++ | Civil: Permissive ++ | Centralisation: Unitarsm +
5. Centralisation: Devolution +
6. Gov Responsibilities: Small Gov ++ | Civil: Permissive +

As I do not feel this concern government responsability at all, netheir religion, religion are agaisnt incest and view this as immoral and a crime.
Darkylightytwo
 
Posts: 803
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2014 6:27 am

Re: Policy on incest

Postby l-rouge » Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:32 am

No "all forms of incest are legal" option? Considering there is an "all incest is illegal" option it makes sense that the opposite is also available as a choice.
Supporting Hobrazia since 2035
"Do as we say. Why? We Say So!"
User avatar
l-rouge
 
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 12:16 pm
Location: 日本

Re: Policy on incest

Postby Darkylightytwo » Mon Oct 13, 2014 8:40 pm

this would be legalizing forced sexual relationship and legalizing rape between familly, that is why it is between consenting adults.
Darkylightytwo
 
Posts: 803
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2014 6:27 am

Re: Policy on incest

Postby l-rouge » Fri Oct 17, 2014 12:00 am

Not really. It would be legitimising all "types of incest" but would not legitimise rape as that would be a separate law.
Supporting Hobrazia since 2035
"Do as we say. Why? We Say So!"
User avatar
l-rouge
 
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 12:16 pm
Location: 日本

Re: Policy on incest

Postby thutchinson13245 » Sun Oct 19, 2014 1:22 am

But that would technically allow incest pertaining to a child so we should leave it at this.
Image
All rights reserved™©℠
"In peace sons bury fathers, but in war fathers bury sons."

Luthori: Online
Al' Badara: Offline
User avatar
thutchinson13245
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 2:09 am

Next

Return to Laws

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests