by Darkylightytwo » Fri Aug 08, 2014 6:00 am
Got to agree, incest policies should not concern government responsabilies, or, not that much.
Just conservative on Moral or permissive.
and of course, unitarism a little bit, like most laws.
So this is the final draft
Name of the Law/Policy: Policy on Incest
Law/Policy Catagory: Moral
Options:
1. All incest is Illegal
2. All incest is Illegal but not prosecuted, only fined
3. Only heterosexual incest is legal by two consenting adult
4. Consenting adults participating in incest is legal
5. Policy on incest if left to the Locals governments
6. The Government has no policy on incest
Effects:
1. Morality: Conservative ++ | Civil Rights: Restrictive ++ | Centralisation: Unitarsm +
2. Morality: Conservative + | Civil Rights: Restrictive + | Centralisation: Unitarsm +
3. Morality: Progressive + | Civil: Restrictive + | Centralisation: Unitarism +
4. Morality: Progressive ++ | Civil: Permissive ++ | Centralisation: Unitarsm +
5. Centralisation: Devolution +
6. Gov Responsibilities: Small Gov ++ | Civil: Permissive +
As I do not feel this concern government responsability at all, netheir religion, religion are agaisnt incest and view this as immoral and a crime.