10th General Assembly Session

An archive of previous sessions of both the General Assembly and Security Council as well as various ad hoc consultations and meetings.

Moderator: RP Committee

Re: General Assembly

Postby stuntmonkey » Wed Aug 02, 2017 11:43 am

Olimpio Gracchus, Leader of the Zardic Socialist Republicans:

Ambassador Allias,

You make assertions about the expansion of a war based on ifs, maybes and what could come to pass. Security Council members can oppose Resolution 28, if they so wish as part of their thoughts on national sovereignty and how much intervention this organisation should be allowed, but to suggest they must do so to stop Istalia going to war with Gaduridos or Beiteynu to sate their imperial ambitions, is clearly speculation.

I ask you this, Ambassador Allias: Given that you condemn and denounce Beiteynu for the recruitment and deployment of troops in Badara to support and train rebels against the government there, will you call on Rildanor to use their influence to look into reports that small quantities of nuclear materials may have been smuggled into Badara for use by the rebels? This is surely a matter that needs addressing most urgently as it would, I'm sure your agree, have a major destabilising effect.
“I venture to suggest that patriotism is not a short and frenzied outburst of emotion, but the tranquil and steady dedication of a lifetime.”

― AES II

Current party - Haruzuterēchisuku Refonpātī
stuntmonkey
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2016 1:37 pm

Re: General Assembly

Postby Axxell » Wed Aug 02, 2017 12:21 pm

Virginia Olivero, Istalian Representative to the Security Council:

probably we didn't specified very well the article and we made an error to call the SC as WC, we apology for this. But our idea of "WC members measures", should have to be that the SC members will be able to take measures against terrorism, but obviously through a resolution of the SC".
We didin't think to allow any members of the WC, so of Terra, to take initiative indipendently by a celar decision of the SC.

We apologize for this and we are ready to modify the Resolution.
Alleanza Radicale (Radical Alliance) - Istalia (Active)
User avatar
Axxell
 
Posts: 1495
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2016 8:08 am

Re: General Assembly

Postby Arapaima13 » Wed Aug 02, 2017 1:23 pm

Tomas Allais, Kanjorien Representative for the World Congress

I thank the Istalian Delegation for clearing the matter up, and hope that the resolution shall be altered shortly.

This will also most likely be my last appearance within the World Congress personally, as I am retiring from my post after the upcoming election within Kanjor. I thank all the delegates for the important roles they are playing within the international community. I also wish my successor, whoever that may be, the best of luck, and hope that he will represent Kanjor to the best of his ability, as I hope I have done.
"Sometimes the people you think you hate actually turn out to be alright."
Federal Democratic Party: Dolgava, Since 4350
RP Team / General RP Coordinator
User avatar
Arapaima13
 
Posts: 279
Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2017 8:39 pm
Location: Kalopia

Re: General Assembly

Postby Ice tea » Wed Aug 02, 2017 3:04 pm

Mariana Spaghetti, Istalian Representative for the General Assembly:

We thank mr. Thomas Allais for his work within the WC and wish him a very happy retirement. I will leave the GA as well, giving my seat to former Prime Minister Fatima el-Nouri as Istalian Representative to the General Assembly.

As representative of the Istalian government, I would like to announce that the Istalian government has decided to follow the will of the Badaran people regarding the presence of Istalian troops in Badara. This is because the following Badaran General Election will install a (new) government according to the will of the Badaran people. Whenever the democratic elected government of Badara (after the election) demands the Istalian forces to leave, our troups will leave immedeately.

I hope this clarifies the prospects of Istalian presence in Badara. Our troups are there at request of the Badaran government, and will leave when they get the order to.
Alleanza Verde Progressista - U.P.A. (Istalia) - Inactive
Ice tea
 
Posts: 33
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2017 8:49 pm

Re: General Assembly

Postby Zanz » Wed Aug 02, 2017 5:40 pm

Cyrille Rodier, Rildanorian Ambassador and Representative to the Security Council

Friends of the Congress,

At the urging of my friends in Kanjor, along with the urging of the Zardugalis, I have proposed the following resolution to the Security Council in response to the situation in Badara.

---------------
Resolution 29

The Security Council of the World Congress,

NOTING that the nation of Badara is now irreparably embroiled in a violent civil war,

NOTING that international intervention in Badara, even intervention at the behest of the government of Badara, has done nothing but escalate tensions and lead to tragic acts of terrorism in numerous nations,

PROCLAIMING that the civil war in Badara must come to a swift end for the purposes of restoring basic human rights and stability,

RESOLVES that from this moment forward, any intervention in Badara by forces or humanitarian missions from nations outside of Badara must be explicitly authorized by the World Congress Security Council in a resolution drafted specifically for the purpose.

FURTHER RESOLVES that any nation found in violation of this Resolution will be condemned by the Security Council and placed under "probationary status" in the World Congress.

DEFINES "probationary status" as grounds for immediate removal from the Security Council (if applicable) and grounds for the consideration of removal, by 2/3rds vote of the entire World Congress, from active status in the World Congress itself.
---------------

Of course, many of you will note that I have proposed this resolution, for expediency's sake, directly in the Security Council without first consulting this august body. I am concerned by the necessity of this, and of course am open to your comments on the act, but feel it justified, given that I do not feel that Istalia nor Beiteynu can any longer be trusted with roles in the conflict in Badara.

As this exigency exhibits, there are, therefore, some circumstances where the Security Council must act without due deliberation first by the World Congress. I should like to resubmit an amended proposal for your consideration.

(Originally posted here)
---------------
The Security Council of the World Congress,

NOTING that for some time the members of the General Assembly have been denied their right to review and comment upon resolutions prior to their official submission for vote in the Securit Council,

RECOGNIZING that the World Congress is a vessel for the will of Terra's manifold nations, and that the Security Council bears a responsibility to represent the interests of those multiple nations, regardless of their own disposition toward the interests of the various states,

RESOLVES that upon passage of this resolution, all future resolutions shall be considered invalid and void unless they are first presented in the General Assembly chambers for open comment and debate, and allowed to sit in debate for at least 18 months (OOC: 3 days RL time). After such debate period, the bill may be presented to the Security Council for official consideration.

FURTHER RESOLVES that in cases of the utmost urgency, the stipulations of this Resolution may be waived for the purposes of expediting a Security Council response to a situation of grave need. If this Resolution's stipulations should be waived, the text of the resolution being considered must be presented to the World Congress as soon as is possible, and the Security Council must give due credence to the wishes of the World Congress after-the-fact, even so far as to rescind its original resolution if the will of the World Congress makes clear that the resolution is not favorable to it.
---------------
Just a bunch of shit.
User avatar
Zanz
 
Posts: 1488
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 4:13 pm

Re: General Assembly

Postby RedReaper » Wed Aug 02, 2017 8:44 pm

Abdul Amari Delegate Leader of the Revolutionary Federated Socialist Republic of Badara, Delegate Leader of al-Aitihad, Commander of al-Aitihad al-Muqatilin and Supreme Commander of the Badaran Military.

I wish to bring to the Assembly's attention recent events which are highly important and require immediate discussion and action. The Beitenyu military has, in secret, been funding the Coaliton Forces of the Badaran Civil War, specifically the MARINE Paramilitary and Terrorist Organisation which carried out the recent terrorist attacks in Istalia and Badara. They have provided them with training and arms, and there are solid reports that they have transported nuclear material into the country to be used by MARINE in a possible attack. They have now escalated their involvement by beginning the deployment of 50,000 Beitenyu soldiers to Badara in order to attack the legitimate and democratically elected Badaran government, aswell as all who support us, including Istalia aswell as Kafuristan and members of the MRSF. This is a declaration of war, and a war crime which cannot go unpunished. We ask the World Congress to do whatever is in their power to bring the Coalition and their supporters to justice and to end this god forsaken war before millions more innocent Badaran and Istalian civilians die.
Thank you.


Links:
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=532236

viewtopic.php?f=17&t=52&start=330
User avatar
RedReaper
 
Posts: 511
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2017 10:02 am

Re: General Assembly

Postby Govenor12 » Wed Aug 02, 2017 9:43 pm

It was not Beiteynu which first set troops into motion to conquer another country. Beiteynu did not sent thousanads of troops to Badara like Kafuristan or Istalia. We react only to the an illegal conquering of another country. We already have launched an internal enquiery into the lost nuclear material and are confident to find out what has been going on. Furthermore we would like to underline that the Knesset has not yet decided on the increase of the troop thrershold.


Automatic answering machine of Beiteynu to the General Assembly
Govenor12
 
Posts: 404
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2016 11:20 am

Re: General Assembly

Postby RedReaper » Wed Aug 02, 2017 9:58 pm

Abdul Amari;
The Kafuristan and Istalian troops are there at my own request, and have a far smaller force than you currently are planning on sending. You are a terrorist funder and supporter who is soon to become a foreign invader, aswell as giving the tools to MARINE they need to make a dirty bomb. And as both parties in Beitenyu are strongly anti communist and strongly pro the coalition it is only a matter of time till the Bill passes in the Knesset. That is why actions must be taken now, not after the troops have arrived and start shooting innocents people like the Coalition do.
User avatar
RedReaper
 
Posts: 511
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2017 10:02 am

Re: General Assembly

Postby Govenor12 » Thu Aug 03, 2017 8:28 am

Again, we are determind to continue our support for the brave freedom fighters unless there is a longlasting solution for peace in Badara, without communist nonsens. We were not the first who used words like war. And zour "request" was nothing more then plea by your puppet government to get help by your real boss: Istalia. We are in numerous talks with countries in the region and are determind t improve the supply support for the coalition.




Automatic answering machine of Beiteynu to the General Assembly
Govenor12
 
Posts: 404
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2016 11:20 am

Re: General Assembly

Postby stuntmonkey » Thu Aug 03, 2017 10:24 am

Olimpio Gracchus, Leader of the Zardic Socialist Republicans:

I am encouraged to see that Ambassador Rodier has proposed Resolution 29 and thank the now-departed Kanjorian representative for listening to my concerns and helping to persuade Mr Rodier to take this correct course of action.

I would also like to praise the Istalian government who have immediately declared they are prepared to withdraw their small peacekeeping force to aid stability and in the spirit of this resolution; please compare that to the reaction of the government in Beiteynu.

In regards to Resolution 29, I would like to make one small point, ambassador. It relates to this section:

DEFINES "probationary status" as grounds for immediate removal from the Security Council (if applicable) and grounds for the consideration of removal, by 2/3rds vote of the entire World Congress, from active status in the World Congress itself.

Would this require a 2/3rds vote of the entire World Congress OR 2/3rds of votes cast over a set period of time?

I ask because participation in the General Assembly can be woefully low on occasions and we might be waiting indefinitely for a result if we do not set a time limit. Also, who gets to vote – is it the governments of sovereign nations only or others too? The General Assembly allows any representative of any political body, organisation etc to participate so where do you draw the line?

Would the ambassador be able to clarify, please. My thanks in advance.
“I venture to suggest that patriotism is not a short and frenzied outburst of emotion, but the tranquil and steady dedication of a lifetime.”

― AES II

Current party - Haruzuterēchisuku Refonpātī
stuntmonkey
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2016 1:37 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Sessions Archive

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests