10th General Assembly Session

An archive of previous sessions of both the General Assembly and Security Council as well as various ad hoc consultations and meetings.

Moderator: RP Committee

Re: General Assembly

Postby stuntmonkey » Sun Aug 06, 2017 8:13 am

Constantine Zonarus, Zardic Ambassador to World Congress:

We echo the thoughts of the Selucian ambassador and offer our condolences to the family of the General Secretary.

We call for an urgent investigation but ask that there is no knee jerk response when the perpetrators are discovered. Majatran stability is once again in jeopardy and I hope cool heads will come to the forth.
“I venture to suggest that patriotism is not a short and frenzied outburst of emotion, but the tranquil and steady dedication of a lifetime.”

― AES II

Current party - Haruzuterēchisuku Refonpātī
stuntmonkey
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2016 1:37 pm

Re: General Assembly

Postby Reddy » Sun Aug 06, 2017 12:46 pm

Woyzero Menen Yilma, Cobura's Ambassador to the World Congress:

Cobura wishes to express its utmost condolences to the Mareš family on the loss of this fine and brave public servant. We condemn, without reservation, the violent and senseless terror attack and a number of nations and person known to us all who are fanning the violence in al'Badara with inflammatory actions and rhetoric. Cobura believes that only a diplomatic solution will end the civil war and to restore peace and stability to Badara and by extension, east and southern Majatra. There's a real danger of this conflict and other surrounding events creating a vortex of instability which might put the entire region in flux and we must work together to prevent such a result. It's only yesterday that a devastating economic crisis gripped Terra and raged on due to lack of cooperation. Are we willing to learn from that?
To live outside the law, you must be honest.
Reddy
 
Posts: 4116
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 7:20 am

Re: General Assembly

Postby Arapaima13 » Mon Aug 07, 2017 4:34 pm

Kalċidon Miċallef, Party Member, and Foreign Minister Candidate of the Partit Libertarjul Nazzjonali Quildanja:

My party is most concerned with the crisis in Badara. So far, our government, despite bordering the war torn country, albeit by a channel of water, have not commented on or recognised the conflict at all. It is our opinion, within my party, that Cildania deserves a voice regarding their neighbour, and that voice has not been heard yet.

Now, I cannot speak for Cildania's current government, but I can speak for my party when I say the current disregard to find a peace deal by the UNION troops is most unnerving. Their pursuit to destroy the coalition is purely ideological. This can be backed up by the communist regime's foundation of the international organisation URSR. In truth, we can see that the communists have no regard for the people of Badara, but rather of their own cementation of power, and the brutal suppression of a democratic and liberal system.

Should their aim have been to restore peace within Badara, then perhaps our stance may be one more of neutrality regarding the conflict. However, when they are explicitly naming the Coalition as a "Capitalist Terrorist Organisation", it begs the question of why they feel the necessity to name the opponents ideology. The reason, we believe, for this is so they can try and connote capitalism with terrorism. Therefore, it is quite apparent to see that this war is, as we have previously mentioned, not based upon finding stability, but rather upon ideology.

Perhaps their original intentions were admirable - to end the war through eliciting help from Istalia. But to see their cataclysmic collapse as consequence of the corruption of power is a euphemism for the fallacious failings of the ideology named as socialism. Their goodwill has indeed been thrown out of the metaphorical window, and their greed has now become beyond transparent, for all Terrans to see. It is a sad microcosm of their ideology. Socialism, which promises a most wonderful utopia for all people, instead provides us with conflict, division, and poverty.

Despite this, we still see the floccinaucinihilipilification of the Coalition troops in Badara. Their intent to prevent an oppressive and authoritarian government should be applauded, not condemned. Their resilience against the outrageous crimes committed by this communistic organisation is something that this World Congress should stand by, not abandon. We need to stand up for a free, fair, and open Badara - and supporting the current socialist regime within the nation would be a betrayal of the original functions of the World Congress, and to the citizens of all of our nations, who have the right to a free and democratic democracy.

Therefore, I propose that the World Congress banish their pro-regime stance, and start to help the good guys in this war. The death of the General Secretary is on all of your hands for collaborating with the tyrannical, and illegitimate so-called government of Badara. The truth is that they are wrecking all chances of returning to stability within Majatra. We need an iron fist response to finally abolish the communistic regimes and dictatorships within Majatra and across Terra. It should be our responsibility to end the needless suffering of those people who live in fear everyday of their intrusive governments. This World Congress quite rightly is quick to cry shame upon far right extremism. Why doesn't it do the same about far left extremism?
"Sometimes the people you think you hate actually turn out to be alright."
Federal Democratic Party: Dolgava, Since 4350
RP Team / General RP Coordinator
User avatar
Arapaima13
 
Posts: 279
Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2017 8:39 pm
Location: Kalopia

Re: General Assembly

Postby stuntmonkey » Mon Aug 07, 2017 7:11 pm

Constantine Zonarus, Zardic Ambassador to World Congress:

I think we should wait for the passage of Resolution 29. Then we will surely see if this organisation has the integrity and the unified will to do what is right to end this conflict - or whether petty political gain will once again dominate who condemns who, and determines who will be branded a freedom fighter as opposed to a terrorist.
“I venture to suggest that patriotism is not a short and frenzied outburst of emotion, but the tranquil and steady dedication of a lifetime.”

― AES II

Current party - Haruzuterēchisuku Refonpātī
stuntmonkey
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2016 1:37 pm

Re: General Assembly

Postby RedReaper » Mon Aug 07, 2017 7:20 pm

Delegate Leader Of The Republic- Abdul Amari- Via A Video Call From the Lamond Peace Conference
To be quite honest, there isn't much I can say to the Cildanian delegation, other than asking, where is the rock you have been living under for the past 6 years? Have you no knowledge of any of the events that you speak of? Have you not watched the news? The Nov-48 World Congress attack occurred during a peace negotiation, that everyone but the Coalition attended, including the late Abu Bakr Sharik, the Badaran foreign minister and prominent member of al-Aitihad. He was shot dead by a Coalition terrorist while at the stand speaking of a lasting peace in Badara. That was 4 years ago. I am now currently attending another Peace Conference, today, where I am to speak to delegates representing the Coalition Central Command, an organisation which surprisingly are capitalists and are terrorists.
The Current Badaran Government has been democratically elected and continues to be so. If the people wished for the United Conservative Forces to govern Badara, we would gladly let them. We are not a dictatorship, and we are not authoritarians. We have not brought conflict, we have fought for peace, we have not brought division, we have fought for a united future, we have not brought poverty, we have lifted millions from it. There are no crimes we have commited. Go on, list them! You call us ideologues when you attack us solely on ideological grounds, not with evidence.
Now why did we call the Coalition a 'Capitalist Terrorist Organisation'. Because that is what they are; a Capitalist Terrorist Organisation. As much as an organisation who commits terror in the name of Communism would be a Communist Terrorist Organisation and as much an organisation which commits terror in the name of Ahmad would be an Ahmadist Terrorist Organisation. How this means that all Capitalists, all Communists and all Ahmadists are terrorists is something I honestly don't think I'll ever understand.
This war was founded upon ideological struggle. Hence we are not willing to end our revolution and allow the Coalition to win. Would you if a Communist Rebellion was occuring, let them win for the sake of peace? No! You would fight on for what you think is right! We are not going to give in to terror, regardless of how much you say that makes us monsters.
Now currently we are in a peace negotiation. You, the Cildanian delegation, are currently changing the dynamics of the situation, by giving justification to the continued military action of an organisation which has cost hundreds of thousands of lives, and destroyed millions more. Now we suggest you allow peace to be achieved rather than trying to undermine a Government which seeks to achieve it.
Thank you.
User avatar
RedReaper
 
Posts: 511
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2017 10:02 am

Re: General Assembly

Postby Axxell » Mon Aug 07, 2017 7:31 pm

Viriginia Olivieri, Istalian Representative to the World Congress:

Respectable representative Micallef,
Sorry, but what laws introduced Badaran Government to oppress their people? What political or civil liberties they have suppressed? But most important: how the current Badaran Government reached to lead Badara? Through the violence? Not! They won a regular election which nobody contested, if not with the arms.
The Coalition in fact rose up in arms beginning a war because they didn't accepted the right of the government expression of the Parliamentary Majority to legislate. This should be considered instead a democratic behavior?
Furthermore in the last elections, did the Government act against other parties who wished to contest the elections? There are evidences of form of restrictions to favurite its own party? Until now even the Coalition or the opposition existet parties never rose such issues.
And, rather than use such amount of ideological rethoric, could you list us the terrorism acts carried out by the Badaran Governement?
To us not seems was the Badaran Government to kill 247 istalians and other hundreds of people in Romula and in Badara.
We didn't see the Badaran army attack our humanitarian staff or hunting the civilians during the assaults against the refugee camps. The Coalition did it.
We didn't see the Coalition forces to secure the floading of the refugees allowing them to reach the refugee camps. The Badaran Government instead did it.
We saw indead a Government ready to accept a ceasefire, to meet into a peace conference and most important, we saw a Government which, facing a critical situation for thousands of refugees, who, point to be not understimate, were escaping the Coalition assaults into territories still under the Govenrment control, accepted many conditions to allow the rescue of the civilians, also allowing Beiteynese ships to reach their territorial waters to oversees on the neutrality and the effective humanitarian purposes of the mission sent by my nation.
If the Badaran Government will show to act against the democratic processes and to suppress political as well as foundamental civil liberties, Istalia would be the first to denounce such a behavior, but until now we recognized the violation of the most basic democratic rules only by part of the Coalition and nobody until now showed us some evidence to consider illegitime the Badaran Government if not rethoric and ideological opposition.
In the last years many nations criticized the World Congress to be under the services of national interests, and now this organization should take a clear ideological position not supported by evidences?
How could this organization should protect the Democracy if it should act against a Government only on the basis of ideological positions without evidence of an infringement of the Democratic principles?
We ask just some clarification and evidences of the terroristic and anti-democratic acts which carried out the Badaran Government.

Thank you
Alleanza Radicale (Radical Alliance) - Istalia (Active)
User avatar
Axxell
 
Posts: 1495
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2016 8:08 am

Re: General Assembly

Postby Arapaima13 » Mon Aug 07, 2017 9:15 pm

Kalċidon Miċallef, Party Member, and Foreign Minister Candidate of the Partit Libertarjul Nazzjonali Quildanja:

To be quite honest, for the illegitimate government of Badara to say that it is working towards a peace deal when it has asked of its fellow socialist nations within the URSR to provide troops to fight against the Coalition is simply attempting to pull wool over this Congress' eyes. Their organisation will undoubtedly cause peace talks to stall. You took Dorvik out of the negotiations because your poor little socialist minds couldn't handle their criticism against you. If you cared about peace I would call upon you to reinstate both the nations of Dorvik and Rildanor to the negotiation table - as members of the Security Council and to allow them to have their say.

Your government is a terror to those citizens in Badara who want to live under a government that offers them a free market and private services - not a socialist wreck. To suggest people want you to be in power when only 12 million of the 99 million people in Badara voted for you is absurd. If they really were passionate about your leadership, we would have seen your turnout much higher. In truth, to suggest that they have the mandate of the people is ludicrous.

Anyway, doesn't your communist ideal state that constant revolution is key to progress. Well, this is a revolution against the so-called government. The concept of a counter revolution, which I am sure you'll attempt to use in defence, is ridiculous. Counter revolution doesn't exist - its just the oppressed ideology fighting back against the ruling ideology. It is just the cycle of politics coming back to bite you. If revolution must continue by your own beliefs then I call upon upon people in Badara to revolt against the current Communist Regime. Fulfill their ideology by beating the concept of communism out of government.

As for the Istalian delegation, just look at the URSR. How much bloody evidence do you need? They asked for troops in Badara. They asked you for troops in Badara. They have asked everyone they can for troops in Badara. Sure they say they want peace - so do Beiteynu - and yet that doesn't stop either of your delegations claiming they want the war to continue. Further to that, it doesn't stop you from saying that the Coalition wants the war to continue when it has placed a delegate at the negotiation table. You ask for evidence. Let me ask for evidence. Let me see evidence that the commies want peace. Sure they have been to these peace negotiations - so has Beiteynu. Give us actual proof.

"Sometimes the people you think you hate actually turn out to be alright."
Federal Democratic Party: Dolgava, Since 4350
RP Team / General RP Coordinator
User avatar
Arapaima13
 
Posts: 279
Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2017 8:39 pm
Location: Kalopia

Re: General Assembly

Postby RedReaper » Mon Aug 07, 2017 9:45 pm

Abdul Amari;
Seriously? So asking for support in a war means you want the war to continue does it? No. Obviously. It simply means you want to win. The Coalition up to this point was not in the mood to negotiate; hence the Badaran Government had decided, unsurprisingly under the circumstances at the time, that the Coalition would not negotiate and hence they would have to be defeated in combat and forced to surrender. Hence we looked to the General Assembly Of The URSR for support. We are more than happy to end the conflict via negotiation, indeed we are in the very process of ending it. What amazes me is the instant a negotiation begins that may successfully end the conflict, everyone begins turning on the Badaran Government and threatening war. Who wants to end the conflict again?
A socialist wreck? Evidence please? So far the socialist society in Badara has functioned perfectly, and achieved many improvements and developments, including the complete elimination of poverty and capital. Unsurprisingly in a war some of these developments have been severely effected. But that doesn't mean positive changes haven't been made. You say that because people do not vote that is evidence they hate us? No. That is evidence that they do not want change. They have every ability to vote for the United Conservative Forces, the Coalition's Political Wing, any day, but choose to stay at home with their family or in their workplace with their comrades. Who are we to judge them? We are not preventing them from voting, they simply choose not to. Maybe it's because they know we will do the right thing? Who knows. But I assure you if you take a poll, we come out on top. Indeed here's one we carried out earlier. http://classic.particracy.net/generatep ... tion=party
As for permanent revolution, revolution in what sense? Revolution of the Workers? Indeed, that revolution must continue. However what the Coalition provides is a false revolution, a revolution of the Capitalists, a revolution of the bosses, of the oppressors, the exploiters. This is not a revolution of the people, but of a minority. No wonder the vast majority of Coalition Fighters are foreign mercenaries. They do not fight for Badara. They fight only for themselves.
User avatar
RedReaper
 
Posts: 511
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2017 10:02 am

Re: General Assembly

Postby Axxell » Mon Aug 07, 2017 11:29 pm

Virginia Olivieri:

So some foreign nations can support the Coalitions with troops, funds, equipements and weapons, a support that we think they requested around the world, they requested it also to us, "against the commies", and the Badaran Government cannot request the same support?

But there is a foundamental difference: the current Badaran Government didn't arose to the power through violent means. They contested the elections and they gained regularly. The one who didn't respected the outcome of a democratic expression of the will of the Badaran people was the Coalition, which judge as a suitable and "democratic" way to political acting an armed uprising to overcome the results of the elections. Who is the real menace to the rights and the feeedoms of the Badaran people?

Annd your depicting of the Badaran economy is so biased... If not for the regulation to make parteciping the employees and worke rs into the decision of their companies, we didn't recognize so greatly difference from economy regulations of other nations but most important, we didn't recognize law which limit the civil or political rights of the badaran citizens, which the current law s allow to express their thought without limitations or persecutions and which doesn't limit the rights to other political parties to contest elections.

About the last elections, there is a war! But there are still territories not touched, why so great support if the Government ruined the life of badarans?
ANd , as pointed out, an internal vast revolutions doesn't needs of the large deployement of foreign fighters which we are seeing in Badara.
Alleanza Radicale (Radical Alliance) - Istalia (Active)
User avatar
Axxell
 
Posts: 1495
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2016 8:08 am

Re: General Assembly

Postby Zanz » Tue Aug 08, 2017 3:43 pm

Cyrille Rodier, Rildanorian Ambassador and Representative to the Security Council

Esteemed friends, we note with concern that the "general assembly" of the so-called "Union of Revolutionary Socialist Republics" has recently passed a resolution which Rildanor feels to be, at least in spirit, if not yet in practice, counter to the stipulations of Security Council Resolution 29 which is due to be passed forthwith. Should the member nations (Kafuristan or Lourenne, and potentially Kirlawa, which is considering ratification of the treaty) of the URSR choose to send "military aid" to Badara, as is stipulated in their resolution, we call upon this body to unanimously condemn the offending member nation with probationary status as stipulated in Resolution 29.
Just a bunch of shit.
User avatar
Zanz
 
Posts: 1488
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 4:13 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Sessions Archive

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests