Re: General Assembly
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2017 7:08 pm
Arbjartur Gilbertsson, Kazulian Ambassador to the World Congress.
I find it funny that before the Yeudish government closed their statement they described their nation in great detail. A dictatorship where unclear formulations are used against political enemies (they will of course deny this, calling it factitious). On the questions of the powers of the World Congress, the Yeudish government spared no pains in seeing that the WC did not exercise any extraordinary powers which might encroach on its national sovereignty. Beiteynu was diametrically opposed to the formation of an organ aimed at investigation human rights violation, Beiteynu, along with other nations who believed that the World Congress is an omnipresent organisation aimed at stealing the sovereignty of individual nations one resolution at a time, were against a proposal to form an organ within the World Congress aimed at conducting authorised peacekeeping mission instead of "intervention" taking by nations similar to Beiteynu; by calling these things "threats to national sovereignty". A classic political move by a dictatorship similar to Beiteynu (which it will deny being), but various nations know this is not far from the truth.
On the question of the World Congress being a thread to national independence/sovereignty. We listen to nations and their respective representatives champion the cause that the World Congress, its organs and its resolutions seeks to systemically rid nations of their sovereignty. To safeguard its particular interests (which i can predict it will deny), the Yeudish government along with a collection of various nations demanded that provisions be made within the World Congress to exclude the possibility of WC control over nations seeing that World Congress was formed "with the aims of becoming an omnipresent forces wishing to encroach on the sovereignty of nations". It appears that certain nations represented within this Assembly are actively using this facade as a legislation magic wand to curb internal influence and thinking and foster an anti-World Congress mentality. It is clear that certain nations want a looser association with the World Congress. I remind these nations that there is nothing stopping them for disassociating themselves with the Congress and they are free to leave and refrain from commenting within the Assembly. If you wish to do so, your comment (seemingly driven by your umbrella objective of bring about things which fall under your interest) will no longer be considered as a rational thought. Not say that they were considered in the past. But i digress as said nations will call that "an attempt to encroach of their democratic rights and national sovereignty." Not to say that some of the nations championing this cause are democratic.
Indeed one can say that certain nations within this assembly are preoccupied in looking after its own selfish interests and not the interests of the entire community. Certain nations seems to want everything out of the World Congress and wants to give nothing to it (a fact which they will deny). Said nations want maximum representation that will put them in a position where they will virtually supplant the WC and the various nations represented (which will also deny). A selfish venture launched by various nations in this assembly Indeed.