7th Security Council Session

An archive of previous sessions of both the General Assembly and Security Council as well as various ad hoc consultations and meetings.

Moderator: RP Committee

Re: Security Council (OOC: authorised participants only)

Postby LobbyingIntern » Fri May 19, 2017 5:33 am

Axxell wrote:
matthewleitch wrote:Baltusian Delegation to the Security Council:

We ask for urgent international discussion. Aldegar, a nation with a record of horrendously discriminatory and homophobic policy have blockaded our coast! This is because they claim a baltusian ship hit an oil tanker. An ongoing investigation is due time be published later this year, however, Aldegar have acted maliciously and are warmongering!

We must stop this! The investigation will say that Baltusian ship did not hit Aldegarian oil tanker, it is politically manufactured lies by a discriminatory Aldegarian government!

Link here: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... startvote=

Please, assist us at this terrible time. Thank you.


The Government of Istalia will not accept such a menace against Baltusia, Aldegar should remember we have a naval base in Baltusia with two of our nuxlear aircrafts and several other ships, included a nuclear balistic submarine.
We pretend Aldegar retires immediatly thier forces from the Baltusian coast.
Whhat kind of proof showed Aldegar? Why still again did Aldegar act against any common international law and convention? Aldegar are also blocking naval forces of the Istalian Republic, forces which if necessary can easily respond to any kind of threat which could come from the aldegarian forces.

If necessary we propose also to organize an investigation leads by the World Congress, but which Istalia is sure will confirme the investigation led by the Baltusian judiciary institution, a renowed stable and democratic nation with an high respect of political and civil liberties, which again have to deal with the menace of a nationalistic, and also megalomaniac, authoritarian regime.


The Government of Aldegar is noting that we cannot find any evidence of the Istalian military possessing anything even remotely resembling those "nuclear aircrafts" or "nuclear submarine". We already have laws against impersonation of military officers, and we are outraged at your blatant attempt to smoochin your flase military record! We will still maintain our blockade against Baltusia unless this infidel, treacherous country stands down!

The people of Aldegar will not allow any of our enemies to ram our tanker ships and blame us for sch mishaps. You may beat our military, but that doesn;t change the fact that our government armed the civilians and trained them to oppose you, bloody invaders!
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=508299

OOC: Just for reference, Istalia is only the "Strong" category of military level of roleplay, so Istalia could not possible have nuclear weapons. You could still claim that the Istalian military base in Baltusia has conveniently are large stockpile of anti-battle ship torpedoes, though.
viewtopic.php?f=11&t=7077
OOC: Sorry to point this out, but
"Hang a map of a place you'll never go on your living room wall. Draw new streets. Tear off bodies of water. Wait for news crews to arrive." So said a mad Nightvalian.
LobbyingIntern
 
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2016 8:59 pm

Re: Security Council (OOC: authorised participants only)

Postby Reddy » Fri May 19, 2017 6:45 am

OOC: Only Security Council members can take part in discussions held here. Posts by any other than members will be redirected to the General Assembly or deleted where appropriate.
To live outside the law, you must be honest.
Reddy
 
Posts: 4116
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 7:20 am

Re: Security Council (OOC: authorised participants only)

Postby Axxell » Fri May 19, 2017 1:03 pm

LobbyingIntern wrote:
Axxell wrote:
matthewleitch wrote:Baltusian Delegation to the Security Council:

We ask for urgent international discussion. Aldegar, a nation with a record of horrendously discriminatory and homophobic policy have blockaded our coast! This is because they claim a baltusian ship hit an oil tanker. An ongoing investigation is due time be published later this year, however, Aldegar have acted maliciously and are warmongering!

We must stop this! The investigation will say that Baltusian ship did not hit Aldegarian oil tanker, it is politically manufactured lies by a discriminatory Aldegarian government!

Link here: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... startvote=

Please, assist us at this terrible time. Thank you.


The Government of Istalia will not accept such a menace against Baltusia, Aldegar should remember we have a naval base in Baltusia with two of our nuxlear aircrafts and several other ships, included a nuclear balistic submarine.
We pretend Aldegar retires immediatly thier forces from the Baltusian coast.
Whhat kind of proof showed Aldegar? Why still again did Aldegar act against any common international law and convention? Aldegar are also blocking naval forces of the Istalian Republic, forces which if necessary can easily respond to any kind of threat which could come from the aldegarian forces.

If necessary we propose also to organize an investigation leads by the World Congress, but which Istalia is sure will confirme the investigation led by the Baltusian judiciary institution, a renowed stable and democratic nation with an high respect of political and civil liberties, which again have to deal with the menace of a nationalistic, and also megalomaniac, authoritarian regime.


The Government of Aldegar is noting that we cannot find any evidence of the Istalian military possessing anything even remotely resembling those "nuclear aircrafts" or "nuclear submarine". We already have laws against impersonation of military officers, and we are outraged at your blatant attempt to smoochin your flase military record! We will still maintain our blockade against Baltusia unless this infidel, treacherous country stands down!

The people of Aldegar will not allow any of our enemies to ram our tanker ships and blame us for sch mishaps. You may beat our military, but that doesn;t change the fact that our government armed the civilians and trained them to oppose you, bloody invaders!
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill. ... lid=508299

OOC: Just for reference, Istalia is only the "Strong" category of military level of roleplay, so Istalia could not possible have nuclear weapons. You could still claim that the Istalian military base in Baltusia has conveniently are large stockpile of anti-battle ship torpedoes, though.
viewtopic.php?f=11&t=7077
OOC: Sorry to point this out, but


OOC: the military ranking shows the position which had istalia. In fact since months and months I developed an RP to change my ranking and you can read an explaination about the evolution of my military rp in this reply: viewtopic.php?f=5&t=7047&start=20#p108183
An RP which began in the IG 60's of the XXXXI century (and if you want I can paste also bills and forum activity for the last IG 100 years with which you could read about the development of a nuclear program in istalia, of the further expansion of the istalian military forces and capabilities.
Furthermore, recently I debated with the military responsable of the RP Team which after an agreed adjustment confirmed me my military capabilities included the possesion of 6 nuclear aircraft carrier and globally I can say also that several players recognize the istalian military capabilities.
Annd I can show also RP activities about the istalian base in Baltusia.
Alleanza Radicale (Radical Alliance) - Istalia (Active)
User avatar
Axxell
 
Posts: 1495
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2016 8:08 am

Re: Security Council (OOC: authorised participants only)

Postby jamescfm » Fri May 19, 2017 8:36 pm

I ask that only those authorised to partake in Security Council discussions do so and that they focus on the matter at hand. How do nations intend to vote on Resolution 21?

-Mariana Fonseca, General Secretary of the World Congress
User avatar
jamescfm
 
Posts: 5584
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 3:41 pm

Re: Security Council (OOC: authorised participants only)

Postby Axxell » Fri May 19, 2017 9:22 pm

Istalia of course vote YES to the Resolution 21.

~ Riccardo Malzi di Arenese, Istalian Ambassador to the World Congress
Alleanza Radicale (Radical Alliance) - Istalia (Active)
User avatar
Axxell
 
Posts: 1495
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2016 8:08 am

Re: Security Council (OOC: authorised participants only)

Postby matthewleitch » Sat May 20, 2017 2:58 pm

Baltusia votes Yes to Resolution 21.
4042-4190: Baltusian Republican Party (Baltusia)
4190- : Republican Party (Cildania)

“If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there’d be a shortage of sand.” -Milton Friedman
matthewleitch
 
Posts: 224
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2016 4:59 pm

Previous

Return to Sessions Archive

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron