Unless I am mistaken there are numerous irregularities in the Security Council election results posted on the forum. Three out of the four in-game seats have inaccurate vote breakdowns and an inaccurate total number of votes.
Due to the time-sensitive nature of this endeavour, I would suggest that Moderation deal with this as a matter of urgency. In case this is not possible I have recorded the election results in a spreadsheet and have taken screenshots of the relevant variables pages for reference (other players might wish to do the same as a means of verifying these results are correct). Fortunately none of these errors are likely to affect the results but they are important to note nonetheless.
In seat A, the total number of votes listed only amounts to fifty-seven; there are fifty-eight countries in the game. Dorvik is incorrectly listed as having eleven votes when it should have only nine. Narikaton and Darnussia is incorrectly listed as only having two votes when it should have five.
In seat B, the total number of votes listed amounts to fifty-nine. Selucia is incorrectly listed as having fifteen votes when it should have only fourteen. Deltaria is incorrectly listed as only having nine votes when it should have ten. Cobura is listed as having a single vote when it should have none.
In seat D, the total number of votes listed amounts to fifty-nine. Hutori is incorrectly listed as only having eleven votes when it should have twelve. Davostan is incorrectly listed as having five votes when it should have only four. Vorona is listed as having a single vote when it should have none.
Based on the results in seat D, I think it is reasonable to conclude that this was not a malicious action from the Moderation team because it is hard to see why colonelvesica would understate Hutori's performance in the election. As I already mentioned none of the results in any of the seats are affected, only the margin of victory in some cases (notably in seat A). Such widespread irregularities are concerning though and suggest that proper care was not given to counting and checking the results before they were posted.
My suspicion on this is supported by the very short time that it took for the results to be posted. If you look at the timestamps for my posts over the past twelve months, you will see that it usually takes me between forty and ninety minutes to collect and process the results. On this occasion it seems to have taken less than ten minutes.