2nd Security Council Session

An archive of previous sessions of both the General Assembly and Security Council as well as various ad hoc consultations and meetings.

Moderator: RP Committee

Re: Security Council (OOC: authorised participants only)

Postby CCP » Thu Dec 08, 2016 6:05 am

OOC: Sorry, I was waiting to see if we'd get a new forum. Hawu votes YES on 7 and 9 with reservations. Hawu Mumenhes doesn't think 7 and 9 go far enough but believes that speedy observer missions will clarify whether Beiteynu and Deltaria have truly reformed.

James, RE: Malivia (resolution 4 I think?), Palmer or another Hawu character volunteers to serve as General Secretary's Special Rapporteur or Envoy for Malivia since Hawu and other empire countries are leading the intervention there.
Global Roleplay Committee Chair(until March 2019)
Ity ꜣḥwt xꜣdt, Hawu Mumenhes
Movement for Radical Libertarianism, Talmoria
Enarekh Koinonia, Cobura
Sizwe Esintsundu Amandla Inhlangano, Ibutho
Christian Communalist Party, Rildanor
CCP
 
Posts: 943
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 4:24 am

Re: Security Council (OOC: authorised participants only)

Postby jamescfm » Sat Dec 10, 2016 11:36 am

With four votes in favour on both, I declare Security Council Resolution 7 and Resolution 9 passed. I would also like to designate the Hawu Ambassador, or an individual he prefers, to take up the mission in the Free State of Malivia and a member of the Istalian delegation to carry out the provisions in Resolution 7. It is my view that those two nations are in the best position in relation to the country being investigated.

-Phang Thi Hong, General Secretary of the World Congress

This week, the Kalistani government (specifically Justice Minister Mauro Curti) received a request to extradite former President and Foreign Minister Sophia Conti to the Yeudish Republic of Beiteynu, from the Prime minister of that nation Abel Kain. Kalistan has an established policy of not extraditing citizens, one which we nearly entered a conflict in order to uphold. My reason for raising this is that Beitynu is a serial human rights abuser, to the point where simply stating that they practice capital punishment is sufficient to have you designated as a terrorist.

I hope the Istalian delegation act quickly in this mission.

-Oscar Machado, Kalistani Ambassador to the Security Council
User avatar
jamescfm
 
Posts: 5641
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 3:41 pm

Re: Security Council (OOC: authorised participants only)

Postby Axxell » Sat Dec 10, 2016 9:16 pm

Members of the Council,

I would like inform you of the decision of the Beiteynu government to end all diplomatic relations with Istalia to avoid to Istalia to follow the Secretary-General's request about the Resolution 7.

Now, after this, I think that Beiteynu is not disponible to consider this organization and their resolution. So, my delegation and my Government pretend that Beiteynu will be suspended as a member of the World Congress and we demand to the General Secretary to start bilateral ralationship as supreme representative of this organization, that Beiteynu practically declared to want totally ignore.

Beiteynu voting for the Security Council, as well as all the Nations that voted about, declared is disponibility to join this organization and respect it and its role.
We must continue to make denigrate in this way the World Cogress? For too many times this organization allowed to the nations officially comdened by the Security Council to continue to make fun of this organization by blocking the General Assembly works and insulting other members.
The Istalian Government do not want attempt or "continue" any dialogue with the Beiteynu Government and we will take national measures for this totally lack of respect.

The World Congress want continue with Beiteynu, well, let the Organization and not a single specified nation to take charge to accomplish the Resolution 7. Beiteynu will not recognize any Security Council representative? They want cut relationship with all the Organization? Well, let suspend or, also better, expulse it.

We are tired to waste time, especially with a nation that was also defense by Istalia. We are deeply offended. Well, stop with this ridiculous teasing.

Istalia kindly decline the invite of the General Secretary, my nation can't handle this, sorry.

~ Giovanni Paolo Fulgi, Ambassador of the Istalian Republic
Alleanza Radicale (Radical Alliance) - Istalia (Active)
User avatar
Axxell
 
Posts: 1495
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2016 8:08 am

Re: Security Council (OOC: authorised participants only)

Postby jamescfm » Sat Dec 10, 2016 10:19 pm

With due respect Mr Fulgi, there is no progress to be made in complete non-cooperation. Of course, I cannot force you to accept my invitation and so instead I appoint Nashwa Ahmed. Nashwa was born in Beiteynu but her family fled to Kalistan when she was only twelve. With twenty years experience as a human rights lawyer, she is more than qualified for the role. I shall ask her to begin carrying out the provisions in Resolution 7 immediately.

-Phang Thi Hong, General Secretary of the World Congress
User avatar
jamescfm
 
Posts: 5641
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 3:41 pm

Re: Security Council (OOC: authorised participants only)

Postby Axxell » Sat Dec 10, 2016 10:40 pm

Mr Secretary,

thank you for understanding.

Istalia in fact proposed to the Council to nominate a World Congress Official Representative and not a third Government to accomplish the Resolution 7.
Would Beiteynu end diplomatic relations also with the whole World Congress?

~ Giovanni Paolo Fulgi, Ambassador of the Istalian Republic
Last edited by Axxell on Sun Dec 11, 2016 2:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Alleanza Radicale (Radical Alliance) - Istalia (Active)
User avatar
Axxell
 
Posts: 1495
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2016 8:08 am

Re: Security Council (OOC: authorised participants only)

Postby jamescfm » Sun Dec 11, 2016 12:20 pm

Greetings to all esteemed individuals,

Given the intense opposition to my appointment and to the general activities of the World Congress emanating from the Yeudish Republic of Beiteynu, it is impossible for me to carry out completely the provisions outlined in the Security Council Resolution 7. Nonetheless, I have prepared a preliminary report for the consideration of this body using a combination of the elementary information available through the legal processes of Beiteynu's government and first-hand accounts from both those who previously lived in Beiteynu and have now fled as well as some who still remain. All names of such individuals have been removed in my report, for their own safety.

Firstly, the Final Solution Act (4118) represents one of the clearest and most significant breaches of human rights I have ever heard of. As well as instituting segregation, through the creation of 'camps', it removes any responsibility whatsoever from those who operate such camps. In doing so, it permits the Yeudish Republic's military to engage in ethnic cleansing with no consequence at all. Though some 'Class B citizens' were able to flee to relatives abroad, in comparison to the number who could not do so, this figure is small. I am led to conclude that the inclusion of Article 3 in this bill was simply a distraction from the later stipulations.

Conditions in these camps, though relatively little information is available about them, is said to be below standards in which animals are kept before scientific testing. Calorific intake is monitored stringently in order to keep the inmates in sufficiently poor health that they are indefinitely hungry but remain able to perform physical labour although mistakes in such calculations were not uncommon, meaning death by starvation was a regular occurrence, according to Witness 1 (who spent eighteen months in a camp before relatives were found in Vanuku). Through the provisions in Article 5, even the most harmless levels of social interaction such as hugging a friend is severely punished and inmates morale levels are perpetually low.

It should be made clear now that the Final Solution is in no way an isolated piece of legislation. Instead, it represents the latest in a series of bills aimed primarily at disenfranchising, segregating and persecuting minorities, particularly ethnic minorities. More benign acts include the Government Religious Policy act, which established Yeudism as a state religion and, quote, 'a policy to encourage conversion to the Yeudish faith by non-Yeudis'. It should be noted that this bill was passed by a previous regime, though, the Yeudish Unity party.

Since the Conservative Yeudish Party ascended to power, there has been a series of far more troubling bills passed. Although I understand I was not directed to review any other legislation in my report, it is pertinent to understanding the Final Solution Act. The National Minority Card was the first bill aimed at targeting minorities, over one hundred years ago. This patern of discrimination has been present throughout the lifetime of any person currently alive today. An explicit policy of segregation, and an official distinction between the Yeudis and non-Yeudis, was estalblished in that same term of the Knesset- by the Segregation Rights Act and the Non-Yeudish Segregation Act.

Therefore, I believe there can be no doubting whatsoever that humanitarian work is overdue and, while I am not in a position to propose other action, more should be done. The most striking finding in my report is that it took so long for the international community to do anything at all. The Yeudish Republic of Beiteynu has been committing crimes against makind and it appears nobody batted an eye.

-Nashwa Ahmed, Security Council Special Rapporteur to Beiteynu
User avatar
jamescfm
 
Posts: 5641
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 3:41 pm

Re: Security Council (OOC: authorised participants only)

Postby Axxell » Sun Dec 11, 2016 2:30 pm

Mr Secretary,

I'm very sorry for the lack of tools of the World Congress toward Beiteynu.
Actually we expected it, it was our interest to push this organization to crashing against the wall of the sovereignty of nations, members or not.

The Istalian Government at the moment is engaged in a profound constitutional reform but I would like inform the Security Council of my personal plan that I will submit to the attention of my Government.

This plan is very simple: establish an Embargo, not only a series of national provisions, but an international treaty like the Malivia Embargo, with few clear provisions and few clear requests for its suspension.
In Saridan the serious economical sanctions contributed to push the Saridanese Government to abandon the slavery, I know that Saridan's economy is far less developed than that of Beiteynu, but we believe that a large and coordinating turnout would affect their economy.
Probably many nations will continue to have relations and trade with Beiteynu, but their resources may still suffer if many of the world's strongest economies will denied its market and its financial resources to Beiteynu.

I'll submit this proposal to my Nation, but in the meantime I would like invite the Security Council to reflect about this proposal.

Thank you

~ Giovanni Paolo Fulgi, Ambassador of the Istalian Republic
Alleanza Radicale (Radical Alliance) - Istalia (Active)
User avatar
Axxell
 
Posts: 1495
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2016 8:08 am

Re: Security Council (OOC: authorised participants only)

Postby jamescfm » Wed Dec 14, 2016 4:19 pm

Following the decision of Oscar Machado to step down as Kalistan's ambassador, I will now be leading our delegation.

-Eleanora Montreal, Kalistani Ambassador to the Security Council
User avatar
jamescfm
 
Posts: 5641
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 3:41 pm

Re: Security Council (OOC: authorised participants only)

Postby Axxell » Thu Dec 15, 2016 12:08 pm

The Istalian Delegation gives its welcome to the new World Congress Ambassador of Kalistan Mrs Montreal.

Today Istalia would like point out the attention of the Council on matter already presented by the Kalistani delegation, the situation in Vorona.

Currently after the fall of the socialist state a military regime is establish in the Country, presented as a temporary situation but that still continue to lead the nation.
My government contacted the opposition force to the regime and we have constate how this opposition do not have instrument to make change the situation and request some kind of aid and support.

The Security Council could be start negotiation between the parts and try to convince the military regime to start the process of normalization of the Country.
We attend that the other members express on the matter.

Thank you

~ Giovanni Paolo Fulgi, Ambassador of Istalian Republic to the World Congress
Alleanza Radicale (Radical Alliance) - Istalia (Active)
User avatar
Axxell
 
Posts: 1495
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2016 8:08 am

Re: Security Council (OOC: authorised participants only)

Postby Axxell » Thu Dec 15, 2016 12:47 pm

Honorable members of the Council,

the Istalian delegation would like make another intervention today, because with the support of the newly formed government of Istalia I would officially present to the Council our proposal of resultion about the Beiteynu situation.

As proposed in one of our last interventions, given the impotence of the Security Council to intervene in Beiteynu, we propose to establish an international embargo against Beiteynu to hit the local government which is committed to perpetrate really crimes against humanity against its own citizens for too many years: racial segregation, mass internments, denial of the most basic rights for the citizens belonging to the local minorities and seems that there are plans to reitroduce the slavery in the nation.

For this reason the Istalian delegation presents:

Resolution 10

SEEING the total refuse to the dialogue of the Government of Beiteynu,

GIVEN the perpetuation of segregation policy, discrimination, internments and negation of most basic rights for the Beiteynu's minority ethnicities.

ACKNOWLEDGING the total lack of respect of Beiteyny for this international organization,

THE WORLD CONGRESS SECURITY COUNCIL

undertakes to organize and establish an International Embargo with a Treaty against the nation of Beiteynu which will provides:

I. All the nation that ratify the Treaty will cease all trade and economic activities with the Beiteynu's Government and with Beiteynu's firms.
II. All the nation that ratify the Treaty will refuse to authorize landing of planes and docking of ships of beiteynu's origin, except if there is an emergency or if come a request of political asylum.
III. All the nation that ratify the Treaty will authorize their law enforcment agency to size all the goods as well as the capitals in transit in their nation which have as final destination Beiteynu.

In addition of this, the Security Council declares Beiteynu suspended by the World Congress which will refuse the partecipation of the Beiteynu's delegation to the organization until the rappeal of this resolution.

These sanctions will only be lifted if the following conditions are met:

I. End of the discrimination of the ethnic minority communities living in Beiteynu.
II. End of the segregation practices for the ethnic minority communities living in Beiteynu.
III. End of the internment of individuals belonging to the minority communities living in Beiteynu.
IV. Recognition of full citizenships to all the inhabitants of Beiteynu.
V. The Authorization for a Mission leaded by the General Secreatary of the World Congress to enter in Beiteynu to ascertain the situation and to determine whether the government of Beiteynu will be actually accomplishing the request of the Security Council to lift the Embargo and to re-admit Beiteynu in the World Congress organization.


Thank you at all.

~ Giovanni Paolo Fulgi, Ambassador of Istalian Republic to the World Congress
Alleanza Radicale (Radical Alliance) - Istalia (Active)
User avatar
Axxell
 
Posts: 1495
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2016 8:08 am

PreviousNext

Return to Sessions Archive

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests