Salvatore Puddu, Istalian Ambassador:
Ambassador Patel,
I really think that the word "illegally" cannot be used in such a situation. A Government has all the right to take similar actions if considered in the best interest of its Nation, surely it is legal when that Government is expression of a democratic system.
Why? Because Hyperion, deciding to enter in the Dalibor market it have to respect the Hutorian laws and is subject to them as well as all the subsidiaries and other forms of association established in Hutori.
Furthermore, Hutori decided to proceed with such measures because Hyperion Corporation is judging to act against the most basical international law infringing the sovereignty of Dalibor.
Then, we invite Malivia to consider also the fact that Hyperion is a legal person based in Malivia. This could authorize third nations to see Malivia as accountable for the actions of Hyperion, which, if it will continue to persue its plans and will concretize statements it made, could be considered as a terroristic and criminal organization for its act against the sovereignty of more then one Nation.
This could cause to Malivia serious issues for its relations with the rest of world.
We invite the Government of Malivia, to which Istalia as established solid relations, to consider more seriously Hyperion corporation and how harmful are its activities for the international community and stability.
To express ourself on the issue about Dorvik, Istalia think that rather than let decide to the Security Council what nations can have a nuclear arsenal, something very very difficult to enforce and which could led also to serious crisis if not armed conflicts, we consider as more praticable to resume the work on an international form of regulation for the nuclear arsenals, maybe on the form of international organization charged to oversees on the nuclear programs of the nations and regulate the matter and related issues, like the trade in materials linked to the production of nuclear devices.
It could be also useful a treaty against the prolification and with which the signatoru nations can set form of limits on the size of their arsenal.
Maybe they can also agree to submit the use of their arsenal to the authorization of the other signatory nations.
However, we agree on the fact that the Security Council should retain the faculty to establish a classification of nations "worthy" or "unworthy" to have nuclear devices, considering first of all how this could be harmful for the international community.