43rd Security Council Session

An archive of previous sessions of both the General Assembly and Security Council as well as various ad hoc consultations and meetings.

Moderator: RP Committee

Re: 43rd Security Council Session

Postby Ab3012 » Sun May 24, 2020 10:27 am

Sandro Bertino, Istalian ambassador

nations of the SC the Istalian Government is aware of the fact that many nations here simply accepted passively what happened considering aspositive the outcome of such a action. But at least my government feels that we must ask something about.
I'm talking about of what a happened in Kalistan. There are some question we cannot fail to pose about.
Why nobody here knew about such a operation? Lourenn is a member of the SC and long lasting debate have interested this council about such military interventions.
We are here to promote diplomatic tools to solve issues but to be able to proceed on this path it is not possible to act in such way without even asking an advice or an opinion.
We cannot fail to consider suspicious also the fact that Lourenne was on the warpath before any request of assistance talking about piracy when we had confirmation from a nation close to the area that there were no signs of such an enormous threat from piracy to justify a nation to mobilize and then Lourenne justified the mobilizatoon also talking about the Socialist Party of Kalistan and justifying the action talking about the past. Thus preventive attacks could be authorized in this or that nation just becuase a party you didn't like come back or because this or that government is or not in place. These are issue I think we cannot fail to talk about.
And then, now we have Lourenne as a single nation actually controlling one of the most vital and busy marittime travel area, really vital for many nations.
But obviously it is Lourenne whichis a friend of many here. Thus this is the picture we have decided to show of the SC:a club for some friends who created the law for everybody else and for whom these law can be circumvented. I cannot be surprised thus by statements such the one made by Kalistan which however in turn showed to be quite hypocrites in attacking other great power and powerful nations being now the actual protectorate of one of these nations.
And there are talks about reforming this organization but actually we don't care of this organization and all Debates about a reform are like smoke in the eyes. And we should not be surprised if many nations now feel themself justified in ayttacking and criticizing this organization and this coubcil.
We cannot deny the fact also that this is now a precedent for this body and the international law and my government wonder in how many way such behavior could be reiterated in other situations. After this action we cannot deny that other nations could feel now in right to intervene in this or that situation. And now the "request of assistance" could be used and interpreted in many ways. There is a risk we will see other internal issues of third countries solved in such way. And when will the "reuquedt of assistance" become a easily excuse to proceed with such military actions? There is this possibility and we cannot fail to consider the fact that other similae situation could be solved manipulating this concept of "request of assistance".
All these are serious issues which for us need to be discussed but it is concerning the fact that until now no one of the Members of the security council said a word about.
Ab3012
 
Posts: 118
Joined: Sat Jun 22, 2019 10:22 am

Re: 43rd Security Council Session

Postby Ab3012 » Sun May 24, 2020 11:13 am

Sandro Bertino, Istalian ambassador

I would also like to appeal to the members of this council but that is an appeal to all nations: the crisis between tremalon and Kivonia is on fire and far too many nations are following a strategy of strength and demonstration of strength that only inflames more and more the crisis and which precipitates the crisis towards war.
But this board still has not opened a discussion on this yet. And few actually diplomatic actions have been seen. We should join forces on this council in order to offer a more incisive diplomatic tool that coordinates efforts to maintain peace. If we want to keep peace and instead don't prefer to show off our muscles by imposing and threatening. Such acts even reduce the chances of a dialogue and the part or parts involved feel threatened with death and destruction and they also become increasingly threatening.
Should be this the reason this council and this congress were designed: Solve conflicts diplomatically to avoid bloody conflicts.
We have to talk about it and offer the parties a table where they can discuss without pointing their weapons at them. I don't think we can rule out any resolution of the conflict in civil and peaceful terms yet it seems that too many already think that the next step is to launch their missiles and troops.
It is good to keep the situation under control and it is understandable that we have to prepare even for the worst-case scenario but we on this board I invite you to work together to avoid a bloody conflict.
Ab3012
 
Posts: 118
Joined: Sat Jun 22, 2019 10:22 am

Re: 43rd Security Council Session

Postby Liu Che/Zhuli » Sun May 24, 2020 1:14 pm

Kang Qigang, Yingdalan Ambassador to the World Congress
Your Excellencies, in light of recent events that we all know about, perhaps it is time for this body to make direct statement on sovereignty. It is good for all of us to individually defend the sovereignty of nations, but would it not be better if this organization endorsed it? Although support for state sovereignty is stated in individual resolutions dealing with specific issues, no resolution has actually dealt with the matter. Therefore, Yingdala proposes the following draft resolution for comments, its final act before leaving the Security Council to its successor.


RECALLING that the World Congress was established to serve as a body where nations could resolve their disputes peacefully;

KNOWING that the World Congress works best when it addresses global issues likes climate change, terrorism, and international crime, among othrs;

BELIEVING that every state in Terra is sovereign;

ESTABLISHES the following principles that guide the workings of the World Congress and its member states:

1. All states in Terra are sovereign and their territorial integrity must be maintained.

2. The World Congress shall not intervene in the affairs of other states on matters that do not concern international peace and security.

3. All states in Terra shall maintain a status of non-aggression toward one another and refrain from using the threat or use of force against another state in ways that are inconsistent with the purpose of the World Congress.

4. All states in Terra must refrain from interfering in one another's internal affairs.

5. The World Congress hall not intervene on areas considered to be part of the domestic jurisdiction of other states.

6. All states in Terra are equal and should endeavor to develop mutually beneficial relations with other states and discard the notion of a zero-sum game.

7. All states in Terra, regardless of regime type or government system, must seek to coexist peacefully.
Image
User avatar
Liu Che/Zhuli
 
Posts: 1246
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 10:41 pm
Location: Indrala (P1) Jing (P3)

Re: 43rd Security Council Session

Postby Liu Che/Zhuli » Tue May 26, 2020 11:16 pm

Kang Qigang, Yingdalan Ambassador to the World Congress
Your Excellencies, since all of you have had ample time to review, comment, and edit the proposed draft resolution, Yingdala believes that it can put it up for a vote.
Image
User avatar
Liu Che/Zhuli
 
Posts: 1246
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 10:41 pm
Location: Indrala (P1) Jing (P3)

Re: 43rd Security Council Session

Postby Ab3012 » Wed May 27, 2020 3:23 pm

Sandro Bertino, Istalian Ambassador

sorry for the retard:a new government took office in Istalia. The new Prime Minister Giorgio Nunziatella cannot say to be satisfied nor from the general silence nor from the proposal made by Yingdala.
Mr Qigang my government consider your resolution as too much vague and as a doubled edged sword. We doesn't think that a single and too general resolution could work facing cases in real world. We fear this resolution could be too easily manipulated as a shield even by aggressive and dictatorial regimes.
It could also create problems to the world congress itself in case there is the need of international missions and peacekeeping missions. Because we cannot exclude the need of such missions and actions and we are doubtful that a further resolution will increase the respect for international law from nations against it.
We should talk about proposals and solutions for the cases we are facing now and we will face in the future. To be handled case-by-case.

About Telamon and Kivonia we as SC we should first of all invite all nation of world not to be involved and then send diplomatic missions in both Telemon and Kivonia to talk with both the governments to keep alive diplomatic possibilities and to offer a negotiation table.
The council should work on this now and not on abstract new piece of international law which currently doen't satisfy our needs.
Ab3012
 
Posts: 118
Joined: Sat Jun 22, 2019 10:22 am

Re: 43rd Security Council Session

Postby Auditorii » Wed May 27, 2020 4:09 pm

"The Kingdom would agree in principle to those proposals from Yingdala, but what if a situation arises that requires us to go against these principals for one reason or another? It makes no sense that we have a binding resolution on us that could prohibit us from acting in a serious circumstance. I have no doubt that Yingdala has the worlds interest at heart but at the same time, we cannot neglect the fact that we've had times where situations arise that are beyond "normal".

I think the more pressing matter of the tension between Telamon and Davostag is the egregious breach of the Hutorian EEZ by Likatonia. They've shown a flagrant disregard for international law."



Image Torben zu Zÿmern und Behm
General-Plenipotentiary (Ambassador/Permanent Representative) to the World Congress
Kingdom of Dorvik
Image Dorvik | Image Zardugal | Image Ostland (FBC)
Moderator
-- Particracy Game Rules
-- Moderation Requests
-- Game Information
-- Particracy Discord
Auditorii
 
Posts: 6279
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 2:51 am

Re: 43rd Security Council Session

Postby Liu Che/Zhuli » Thu May 28, 2020 12:09 am

Kang Qigang, Yingdalan Ambassador to the World Congress
Your Excellencies, we appreciate your comments. Might there be specific suggestions? Indeed, it was drafted in order to gain the widest acceptance of this body. I would also note that the document is titled as "guiding principles", not "binding". Think of it more of an ideal to live up to - for everyone. I would note that points 2 and 3, as well as 5, seem to address all matters pertaining to serious circumstances, international missions, peacekeeping operations, among other abnormal circumstances. But as I have said, we are happy to edit the document if members would please provide specifics. We would ideally like everyone to be happy.
Image
User avatar
Liu Che/Zhuli
 
Posts: 1246
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 10:41 pm
Location: Indrala (P1) Jing (P3)

Previous

Return to Sessions Archive

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests