SC R91: Condemnation of Kazulian aggression

An archive of previous resolutions voted upon by the World Congress.

Moderator: RP Committee

SC R91: Condemnation of Kazulian aggression

Postby jamescfm » Thu Jun 11, 2020 9:32 pm

Security Council Resolution 91
The Security Council,

Acknowledging that the mobilisation of naval forces represents an attempted projection of military force,

Recognising that peace and stability in the Majatran Sea is the responsibility of Majatran countries and not foreign powers,

Condemns the Kazulian decision to deploy naval forces to the Majatran Sea as a hostile act of military aggression intended to provoke regional tension;

Urges all countries to apply pressure to Kazulia to withdraw the Fifth Fleet from the region with immediate effect.


Yes: Jakania
No: Lourenne; Kazulia (veto); Dorvik (veto); Keymon; Hutori (veto)
Abstain: Hanzen; Istalia; Valruzia

The resolution was not adopted.
User avatar
jamescfm
 
Posts: 5660
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 3:41 pm

Re: SC R91: Condemnation of Kazulian aggression

Postby jamescfm » Thu Jun 11, 2020 9:33 pm

Image Ms. Wardiyya al-Darwish, Jakanian Permanent Representative to the World Congress:
Jakania votes YES to Resolution 91.
User avatar
jamescfm
 
Posts: 5660
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 3:41 pm

Re: SC R91: Condemnation of Kazulian aggression

Postby Luis1p » Thu Jun 11, 2020 9:44 pm

Image Valerie Laupin, Lourennais Royal Ambassador to the World Congress:

This is truly a sad day for Security Council. Petty nations beginning tireless crusades against a nation who is doing nothing but aiding a long time ally. Surely this is only a platform for pretentious members to impose their anti-imperalist propaganda which of course, is only fueling the fires of tension.

Let it be known that the United Kingdom of Lourenne votes NO on Resolution 91 and will pursue further action should this useless resolution pass.
Image
User avatar
Luis1p
 
Posts: 2064
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2017 6:01 pm
Location: Chicago, USA

Re: SC R91: Condemnation of Kazulian aggression

Postby Maxington » Thu Jun 11, 2020 10:21 pm

Image Mr. Zakarias Westermarck, Kazulian Ambassador to the World Congress
Recognising that the Jakanian Representative has demonstrated declare intent to be overtly aggressive to the Kingdom of Kazulia. Having expelled diplomatic staff and on a clear path to cut diplomatic channels, the chances of a military miscalculation are increasing. In championing diplomacy over aggression, the Jakanian representative has become victim to own hypocrisy. Instead of genuine, peaceful talks similar to what we intend on having in Romula in the coming weeks, we were met with staunch aggression in the form of a provocative military exercise. As stated our intentions were simple but the Jakanian Representative and company sought to use this an opportunity to establish spheres of influence. We stated that the 5th fleet's deployment was rotational, however, some members viewed this a permanent basing of the 5th Fleet. Such a conclusion is expected especially as it comes from representatives with a small talent for misinformation. We do not intend on gracing this resolution with a further response. In recognising the similarity of the Jakanian representatives and company and CARSS, we VETO Resolution 91. We intend on working in the interests of global peace in exercising our rights under MOOTW and Freedom of Navigation as do all states. We will continue to show restraint where the Jakanian representative and company will not; We will continue to demonstrate professionalism in the conduct of our business where the Jakanian representative and company have not; We will continue to work with our partners in all region in accordance with our pre-established treaty agreements.
"The future of the Nation is in the children's school bags" ~ Dr. Eric Williams
President of the Trond Henrichsen Institute for International Affairs.
User avatar
Maxington
 
Posts: 2733
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2013 11:37 pm
Location: Look Behind you.

Re: SC R91: Condemnation of Kazulian aggression

Postby XanderOne » Fri Jun 12, 2020 1:06 pm

Lorenzo Malli, Istalian Ambassador

Colleagues,
Istalia consider such a resolution as useless to solve the situation and indeed it could only worse the relations. Believing in diplomacy it was our duty as great power of Majatra to invite Kazulian representatives in Romula to find a solution, immediatly informing our friends of Deltaria and Jakania.

What was accertain by our legal expertises is that the arrival of the fifth fleet and the excercises with Kalopia are actions supported by agreements between two sovereign nations, aka Kalopia and Kazulia, linked by international bilateral agreements which should respected as will of two sovereign nations.

But we are also sure that no threat will come for Majatra from the Fifth Fleet of Kazulia, which recently we knew it will not include its aircraft carrier, a gesture by part of Kazulia which Istalia recongnize as an intelligent measure to appease such tensions. For this we thanks the disponibility by part of the Kazulian authorities. Furthermore we have been reassured that there are no provision about a permanent presence of such forces.

We are sure that through adeguate talks these tensions can be solved without too hard measures like a SC's resolution.

Thank you
XanderOne
 
Posts: 765
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2019 12:15 pm

Re: SC R91: Condemnation of Kazulian aggression

Postby Wu Han » Sat Jun 13, 2020 1:03 am

Image Her Royal Highness, Ratanaporn, Princess of Hanzen, Sister of His Royal Majesty the King, Hanzenese Permanent Representative to the World Congress:
Honourable Representatives,

The Hanzenese delegation wishes to register its intention to abstain with regard to Resolution 91.

While we deeply respect the concerns of the Jakanian delegation with regard to Kazulian escalation in Majatra, we do not feel that the 5th fleet deployment constitutes a breach of international law or practices for the reasons raised elsewhere in debate. Nonetheless, our decision to abstain should not be viewed as an endorsement of Kazulia's global power projection, nor the pompous language of the Lourennais Ambassador who refers to our developing nations as "petty," and beneath them.
(he/him)
Current: Cildania
Former: Listed Here
User avatar
Wu Han
 
Posts: 844
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2017 10:51 am
Location: Still running up that hill

Re: SC R91: Condemnation of Kazulian aggression

Postby Auditorii » Sat Jun 13, 2020 2:45 pm

"In perhaps quite the turn of events, the Kingdom of Dorvik agrees with elements from the representative from Hanzen. The Kingdom believes in freedom of navigation and if nations wish to participate in exercises for their armed forces, so be it. While we might not like it or the fact that it might incite feelings back home we have to respect bilateral and multilateral relations between states.

We are going to apply our VETO power on this."


Image Angelika Gmehling
General-Plenipotentiary (Ambassador/Permanent Representative) to the World Congress
Kingdom of Dorvik
Image Dorvik | Image Zardugal | Image Ostland (FBC)
Moderator
-- Particracy Game Rules
-- Moderation Requests
-- Game Information
-- Particracy Discord
Auditorii
 
Posts: 6279
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 2:51 am

Re: SC R91: Condemnation of Kazulian aggression

Postby Yolo04 » Sat Jun 13, 2020 11:31 pm

Image Allesandru Jisepu, Representative of the Kingdom of Keymon to the World Congress

Yet again, the Jakanian delegate has displayed his arrogance towards international diplomacy. It has always been the right of all nations to operate within international waters and to station naval vessels in allied waters.

As our above statement displays clearly, we will vote NO
List of Parties:
Image Keymon, Four Pillars Party (MQP): ACTIVE

Dankuk, Hwanghu Dang Party (4613): INACTIVE
User avatar
Yolo04
 
Posts: 940
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2017 6:03 pm
Location: West Virginia, USA (haha country roads jokes are so funny)

Re: SC R91: Condemnation of Kazulian aggression

Postby colonelvesica » Sun Jun 14, 2020 1:43 am

Jennifer Morrison
Hutorian Ambassador to the World Congress


With the greatest of respect to the Jakanian delegation, we find ourselves siding with the Hanzian Delegation. This naval exercise was done with the full consent of the Kalopian government of the time, at no time was international law breached as no nation's EEZ was breached by the deployment of the 5th Fleet. While provocative, if done with the consent and support of the Kalopian government as it was well within the rights of Kazullia and Kalopia to do so.

The Commonwealth of Hutori votes No on Resolution 91 and adds our Veto to the list.
The Last of his Name
User avatar
colonelvesica
 
Posts: 2202
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 4:57 pm
Location: The ether

Re: SC R91: Condemnation of Kazulian aggression

Postby jamescfm » Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:12 pm

Image Mr. Kis Vilmos, General-Secretary of the World Congress:
Voting has now concluded on Resolution 91. The result was one vote in favour and five votes against (including three vetoes), with three abstentions. The resolution was not adopted.
User avatar
jamescfm
 
Posts: 5660
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 3:41 pm


Return to Resolutions Archive

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest