GRC Economic and Military Rankings (March, 2019)

General discussions about the Particracy web game.

Re: GRC Economic and Military Rankings (March, 2019)

Postby Kubrick » Mon Mar 11, 2019 3:42 pm

Where's Jelbania in the economic rankings? Does its absence mean it has no economy? If that's the reasoning I fully agree but some clarity is appreciated.
Crown Party (Kroon Partij / Kronuz Prta) - Vanuku (Active)
National Front (Acies Nationalis) - Selucia (Inactive)
The Radicals (Die Radikalen) - Dorvik (Inactive)
User avatar
Kubrick
 
Posts: 1257
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:47 pm

Re: GRC Economic and Military Rankings (March, 2019)

Postby cm9777 » Mon Mar 11, 2019 3:49 pm

Kubrick wrote:Where's Jelbania in the economic rankings? Does its absence mean it has no economy? If that's the reasoning I fully agree but some clarity is appreciated.


Haha you know Jelbeks and the economy

But yeah thanks that’ll be cleared up
Nationale Liberale Partei Inactive

Dundorfische Nationalistisches Allianz Inactive

Federalistische Partei Inactive

Patriot Party Inactive

Modrá Thalleristická Aliancia Active

Moderation
cm9777
 
Posts: 1545
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2017 6:05 pm

Re: GRC Economic and Military Rankings (March, 2019)

Postby Auditorii » Mon Mar 11, 2019 10:29 pm

jamescfm wrote:Few queries:
  • Why are there so many small powers?
  • What's up with the formatting of these posts?
  • Who controls "PTGameInfo" and why not have some transparency by using their named account?


1. Unfortunately with the downturn of the player base many countries became inactive over a significant period of time or did not engage in what the GRC believed was high-enough levels of RP and issues related to RP.

2. I don't understand the issue with formatting.

3. It is jointly operated by the GRC and Moderation; there is no need for fancy conspiracy theories. It is meant to consolidate posts so that they may be edited without issues related to forum privileges.

Kubrick wrote:Where's Jelbania in the economic rankings? Does its absence mean it has no economy? If that's the reasoning I fully agree but some clarity is appreciated.


Oversight on our part; added.
Chairman of the Global Roleplay Committee
World Congress Coordinator
Auditorii
 
Posts: 1299
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 2:51 am

Re: GRC Economic and Military Rankings (March, 2019)

Postby Auditorii » Tue Mar 12, 2019 2:31 am

Yolo04 wrote:
Budgets are taken into account but not as heavily weighed due to the functionality missing. For reference, a country that has implied spending some 75% on defense could be considered to have some effects of such spending. As of right now, Keymon will remain a little power and we'll continue to review its status.


Little power? I thought Keymon was a middle power?


Middle Power, my apologies. The GRC nor Moderation has made no decision on keeping countries at a specific power level. As I stated, we reviewed and discussed decisions; as we currently are up until the date that the rankings become binding.
Chairman of the Global Roleplay Committee
World Congress Coordinator
Auditorii
 
Posts: 1299
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 2:51 am

Re: GRC Economic and Military Rankings (March, 2019)

Postby Yolo04 » Tue Mar 12, 2019 1:07 pm

Auditorii wrote:
Yolo04 wrote:
Budgets are taken into account but not as heavily weighed due to the functionality missing. For reference, a country that has implied spending some 75% on defense could be considered to have some effects of such spending. As of right now, Keymon will remain a little power and we'll continue to review its status.


Little power? I thought Keymon was a middle power?


Middle Power, my apologies. The GRC nor Moderation has made no decision on keeping countries at a specific power level. As I stated, we reviewed and discussed decisions; as we currently are up until the date that the rankings become binding.


Thank you for clarifying
Despacito, Eat ain’t Burrito
User avatar
Yolo04
 
Posts: 664
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2017 6:03 pm
Location: West Virginia, USA

Re: GRC Economic and Military Rankings (March, 2019)

Postby Auditorii » Thu Mar 14, 2019 2:34 pm

This will be finalized tonight and updated with the remaining last little formatting, etc.
Chairman of the Global Roleplay Committee
World Congress Coordinator
Auditorii
 
Posts: 1299
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 2:51 am

Re: GRC Economic and Military Rankings (March, 2019)

Postby Aquinas » Thu Mar 14, 2019 4:23 pm

Auditorii wrote:This will be finalized tonight and updated with the remaining last little formatting, etc.


Trigunia is missing from both the economic and military rankings.

Dankuk and Dundorf are missing from the economic rankings.

Dundorf is listed twice in the military rankings, both as a middle power and a regional power.

The Third World rankings have not yet been presented.

And these are just the issues I've noticed after a brief scan...
User avatar
Aquinas
 
Posts: 9191
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 1:28 am
Location: UK

Re: GRC Economic and Military Rankings (March, 2019)

Postby Auditorii » Thu Mar 14, 2019 4:52 pm

Aquinas wrote:
Auditorii wrote:This will be finalized tonight and updated with the remaining last little formatting, etc.


Trigunia is missing from both the economic and military rankings.

Dankuk and Dundorf are missing from the economic rankings.

Dundorf is listed twice in the military rankings, both as a middle power and a regional power.

The Third World rankings have not yet been presented.

And these are just the issues I've noticed after a brief scan...


As I said, they will be finalized and properly formatted.

Thank you.
Chairman of the Global Roleplay Committee
World Congress Coordinator
Auditorii
 
Posts: 1299
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 2:51 am

Re: GRC Economic and Military Rankings (March, 2019)

Postby Aquinas » Thu Mar 21, 2019 5:25 pm

So are these rankings all "finalized" now?
User avatar
Aquinas
 
Posts: 9191
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 1:28 am
Location: UK

Re: GRC Economic and Military Rankings (March, 2019)

Postby jamescfm » Thu Mar 21, 2019 6:41 pm

Auditorii wrote:It is jointly operated by the GRC and Moderation; there is no need for fancy conspiracy theories. It is meant to consolidate posts so that they may be edited without issues related to forum privileges.

No conspiracy theories. When rankings are being published and commented on, it is fair to expect that we know who is proposing them, especially given the recent history which suggests that players are perhaps not always able to entirely remove their own personal biases.
User avatar
jamescfm
 
Posts: 2167
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 3:41 pm

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest