Fred wrote:Simple. I don't like it. I increasingly don't like the direction the retcon has taken, in fact.
Martinulus wrote:Fred wrote:Simple. I don't like it. I increasingly don't like the direction the retcon has taken, in fact.
Why? Because we're being original,
Fred wrote:Martinulus wrote:Fred wrote:Simple. I don't like it. I increasingly don't like the direction the retcon has taken, in fact.
Why? Because we're being original,
You're not being original, though, and having a go at me is not going to induce me to join your little project.
Fred wrote:Martinulus wrote:Fred wrote:Simple. I don't like it. I increasingly don't like the direction the retcon has taken, in fact.
Why? Because we're being original,
You're not being original, though, and having a go at me is not going to induce me to join your little project.
You are confusing my organization with my party, which is a secular organization for crusaders in Barmenia. Also, using that argument, you should consider the leader of the "SUC" to be even worse, as his party isn't even Selucian ((Catholic)). The guy has invented his own religion, and turned the organization to another club for IML anti-reformists, without any consensus among the members of the organization on it.EdwardBishop wrote:The leaders of the so-called Selucian Patriarchal Church, see here: http://classic.particracy.net/vieworganization.php?organizationid=2739 believe in very unorthodox theology such as: "Lion Emperor and the Christian God are the same"/ "that feline species are not only descendants of the Moon, but also by the Lion Emperor that lives in the Sun and reveals himself to all the peoples of Terra each day" - this is not the legitimate successor to the Selucian Catholic Church (see above)
And this is precisely why I won't comply with Fred's attempt to take over our State Church. That last edit of the wiki page on religions was incorrect, the so-called SUC isn't part of Hosianism. Moderation needs to take disciplinary action against those big ego's who staunchly refuse to comply with the new reforms of the rules, and create dissension among the players. There is no "Yesu Chrest", and there is no "Chrestianity". Copies of RL-religions are not suited for this game.Fred wrote:Simple. I don't like it. I increasingly don't like the direction the retcon has taken, in fact.
SelucianCrusader wrote:Moderation needs to take disciplinary action against those big ego's who staunchly refuse to comply with the new reforms of the rules, and create dissension among the players. There is no "Yesu Chrest", and there is no "Chrestianity". Copies of RL-religions are not suited for this game.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests