Valdštejn wrote:Just to clarify this a bit - it means, that we will revert the RP about the former ruler being killed, not his removal from office. So if you didn't get Polites' permission, you could see the coup as a success, but the fate of the old Czar would have to be unknown.
I think this interpretation would be closest to the "spirit" of the regs as intended at their inception.
As for the character not being "owned", it is fair to say the situation presented is a shortcoming in the current statute book, although it is "owned by the nation". Perhaps regulations regarding communal ownership should be codified (this should, of course, be decided on by current attitudes and not has-beens like me). Only thing that comes to mind is that royal "Houses" have had debate bills listing their lineages in other nations and perhaps these should be drawn upon to suggest their existance as a communal entity under the care of a primarily-responsible player (bill owner)?
Kudos to Dynastia for the test case though. Why settle for beating the system controlling the game when you can try to beat the system of the system controlling the game?
