I have moved this thread from the Moderation to the General Discussion sub-forum because, from a Moderation point-of-view, there does not seem to be anything I can immediately do for you, although some of your points are arguably worthy of further discussion.
Endralon did not have Cultural Protocols prior it its
current ones, so in terms of the rules, no actual change in the Cultural Protocols took place. I was not a Moderator back then, although given the circumstances at the time, it is probably doubtful any Moderator would have done any different. I understand you
registered your objections at the time and it was pointed out that up until that time Endralon had been classified as Culturally Void.
In general terms, the classification of in-game cultures, religions and languages has been left to players to organise for themselves through the Cultural Protocol system. I would, however, be prepared to listen to any ideas you and others might have for regulating/organising this in a different way.
Some things have already changed in terms of the
rules, by the way. For example, there is now a waiting period before Cultural Protocols can be accepted, in order to ensure there is an opportunity for public discussion/feedback:
16.2.1 Moderation will not approve a Cultural Protocol request within the first 48 hours of it being requested. This is in order to give other players a chance to query the proposed changes, if they wish to do so. Moderation may be approached for advice on a proposed change, but any advice proffered should always be understood under the provisio that no final decision will be made until at least 48 hours after the request has been formally submitted for approval.
Weight can also be attached to the preferences of players outside the nation but with a connection it:
16.5.1 Whilst significant changes should always be justified by role-play, where certain factors are present, Moderation reserves the discretion to adopt a more restrictive or a more relaxed approach to proposed changes. These factors include:
[...]
- Where players not present in the nation but with a strong connection to it are deemed to have presented a strong case. In particular, the nation's recent players, as well as players in the surrounding nations, may be deemed to have a legitimate interest.