Global Role-Play Team recruitment

Talk and plan things about the game with other players.

Global Role-Play Team recruitment

Postby Aquinas » Fri Sep 02, 2016 3:48 pm

We are now at the close of the Cultural Era, when appointments/reappointments for the Global Role-Play Team need to be made.

On behalf of myself and I am sure a number of others, I would like to thank all of the Team members for the work they have done.

Liu Che and Zanz are stepping down. Thanks, guys, for everything you've done.

Kubrick and Polites will be staying on, although they expect to be affected to some extent by time constraints/real-life commitments.

We would like to appoint some new members - hopefully at least one, ideally two and at the absolute maximum three.

This thread has been created in order to give players a chance to nominate the players who they think would make valuable additions to the Team. You can nominate as many players as you want.

We will be watching the discussion closely, and hope to be able to make an announcement on appointments in due course.

For further information on the Global Role-Play Team and its responsibilities, please check out sections 19 and 20 of the Game Rules:

19. Global Role-Play Team.

Moderation may appoint a small number of Global Role-Players, who will collectively comprise the Global Role-Play Team and whose identities will be listed on the Register of Global Role-Players & Nationmasters. Global Role-Players may not generally compel players or nations to role-play, to acknowledge a role-play or to role-play in a particular way, but they do enjoy a special licence to initiate role-play across the game world. They are to put the general interests of the game first and must not pursue any narrow, personal in-game agenda.

The Team takes collective responsibility for its decisions and operates under Moderation's overview. It automatically comes to the end of its term of office at the close of each Cultural Era, when appointments and/or reappointments will be made.

Where appropriate, the Team may delegate role-play and other tasks to players outside of the Team, but it retains overall responsibility.

19.1 The objectives of the Global Role-Play Team are:

- to be an active presence in the game community.

- to promote awareness of and adherence to the Game Rules.

- to liaise with Nationmasters, who they should generally defer to on issues directly affecting a nation the Nationmaster is attached to.

- to supervise the Role-Play Accord (see section 20).

- to lead the role-play of the former colonial territories.

- to lead the role-play of a United Nation-style in-game organisation.

- to initiate and encourage role-play, most especially international role-play and role-play on the forum.

- to encourage discussion on the General Discussion sub-forum about role-play.

- to reach out to players who are new to the game or who have not been extensively involved in role-play before.

- to coach players on the intricacies of the game and on how to improve their role-play.

- to advise Moderation of situations that need attention.

- to advise Moderation of how the rules are working and how they could be improved.

- to recommend new candidates for the Team.

19.2 At Moderation's discretion and with the agreement of the Team as a whole, Team members are permitted to run an authorised second active in-game account in a separate nation, in order to advance the objectives of the Team set out in section 19.1, most particularly with regards to the encouragement of role-play. Where they do this, they should use their party description field in both accounts to explain the situation and provide a link to the other account involved.


20. Role-Play Accord.

Nations which ratify the Role-Play Accord place themselves under the authority of the Global Role-Play Team in terms of economic and military matters. The Team may not impose political decisions upon players, such as to declare war or raise taxes, but they may define the nation's military and economic character.

If the guidance laid down by the Team in this regard is not followed, a report may be submitted on the Role-Play Accord thread. If the report is either instigated by the Team or supported by the Team, then Moderation will make a ruling on the issue.

A nation can ratify the Role-Play Accord by passing a bill supported by a 2/3rds majority of all players with seats (not just those with seats who vote) and over 50% of the seats in the legislature. Also, at least one of the players supporting the ratification must have been currently continuously active in the nation (ie. no inactivations) for at least 1 month. A notification should then be made on the Role-Play Accord thread, so Moderation can update the Role-Play Accord Index.

A nation can withdraw from the Role-Play Accord by passing an appropriate motion with a simple majority of players with seats (ie. more players with seats vote for it than against it). Also, at least one of the players supporting the withdrawal must have been currently continuously active in the nation (ie. no inactivations) for at least 1 month. A notification should then be made on the Role-Play Accord thread, so Moderation can update the Role-Play Accord Index.
User avatar
Aquinas
 
Posts: 9796
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 1:28 am
Location: UK

Re: Global Role-Play Team recruitment

Postby mpog » Fri Sep 02, 2016 4:10 pm

In my opinion Doc would be the obvious choice.

Other candidates are CCP and hts.
mpog
 
Posts: 79
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2016 7:53 pm

Re: Global Role-Play Team recruitment

Postby CCP » Fri Sep 02, 2016 5:47 pm

I hadn't thought of Doc -- he would be great.

Rathon also strikes me as a good choice, if he has the time and plans to stick around for the next however many months.

Omikron Omikronov would also be good.
Global Roleplay Committee Chair(until March 2019)
Ity ꜣḥwt xꜣdt, Hawu Mumenhes
Movement for Radical Libertarianism, Talmoria
Enarekh Koinonia, Cobura
Sizwe Esintsundu Amandla Inhlangano, Ibutho
Christian Communalist Party, Rildanor
CCP
 
Posts: 943
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 4:24 am

Re: Global Role-Play Team recruitment

Postby Rathon » Fri Sep 02, 2016 7:29 pm

CCP wrote:Rathon also strikes me as a good choice, if he has the time and plans to stick around for the next however many months.


I do think that I'll be able to log in at least once every two days for the foreseeable future. My biggest concern is that I don't feel knowledgeable enough about the Particracy world to serve in such a capacity. After all, it's only been one month since I came back from a three-year absence.

I think Doc and CCP would be excellent choices.
Coaliție Unitate Centru
A sensible alternative for all of the Confederation's peoples.
Rathon
 
Posts: 154
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2013 2:40 am

Re: Global Role-Play Team recruitment

Postby hts » Fri Sep 02, 2016 9:15 pm

mpog wrote:Other candidates are CCP and hts.


I just want to say that I would be more than willing to do it, and I will be able to login very frequently for the coming months.
“The truth may be puzzling. It may take some work to grapple with. It may be counterintuitive. It may contradict deeply held prejudices. It may not be consonant with what we desperately want to be true. But our preferences do not determine what's true.”
User avatar
hts
 
Posts: 295
Joined: Sat May 16, 2015 11:15 am
Location: Saridan/The Clouds

Re: Global Role-Play Team recruitment

Postby Doc » Sat Sep 03, 2016 5:46 am

Thank you all for the proposal of my name for consideration.

Question though, if I were to be put on the team, does this mean that Kalistan must join the RP Accord? Now that we have more active players in Kalistan, this would be something we would have to take up.
Primary: Institutionalist Party of Kalistan (IPoK), 5146-

Inactive:
Socialist Party of Kalistan (SPoK), 2591-
Hizb Al'Sultan حزب السلطان 4543-4551
Parti des Frères Lourenne, 4109-4132
Gaduri Brethrenist Movement (MHdG), 4481-4485
User avatar
Doc
 
Posts: 1983
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:29 pm
Location: Kaliburg, Kalistan

Re: Global Role-Play Team recruitment

Postby Aquinas » Sat Sep 03, 2016 10:20 am

Doc wrote:Thank you all for the proposal of my name for consideration.

Question though, if I were to be put on the team, does this mean that Kalistan must join the RP Accord? Now that we have more active players in Kalistan, this would be something we would have to take up.


There would be no requirement for the nation a Team member is playing in to join the RP Accord. However, since Team members are collectively responsible for regulating the RP Accord, there would be an expectation for them to personally respect the RP Accord guidance, even if the nation they are playing in is not signed up to the RP Accord. It would probably be problematic, for example, if a Team member role-played a nation as a military superpower when the Team had designated it as a "Small" power in military terms. Or similarly, it would probably be problematic if a Team member role-played a nation as underdeveloped when the Team had designated it as a nation in economic "High development".
User avatar
Aquinas
 
Posts: 9796
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 1:28 am
Location: UK

Re: Global Role-Play Team recruitment

Postby Doc » Sat Sep 03, 2016 5:28 pm

Yeah, we already play in Kalistan using the RP team's positioning. It seems just a formality to ratify at this point, so the matter is currently in voting in Kalistan.

That is quite separate from this topic, but this discussion just brought the idea back to the fore. Apparently, there is also some interest in Baltusia for joining too, though it is probably to early to say one way or another there. It would have resolved a lot of issues early, had we both ratified it and had someone to appeal the question to....
Primary: Institutionalist Party of Kalistan (IPoK), 5146-

Inactive:
Socialist Party of Kalistan (SPoK), 2591-
Hizb Al'Sultan حزب السلطان 4543-4551
Parti des Frères Lourenne, 4109-4132
Gaduri Brethrenist Movement (MHdG), 4481-4485
User avatar
Doc
 
Posts: 1983
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:29 pm
Location: Kaliburg, Kalistan

Re: Global Role-Play Team recruitment

Postby Reddy » Sun Sep 04, 2016 6:38 am

mpog wrote:In my opinion Doc would be the obvious choice.

Other candidates are CCP and hts.


I also think these 3 would be great. Another great choice would be Maxington. Where are you hiding, Max?
To live outside the law, you must be honest.
Reddy
 
Posts: 4116
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 7:20 am

Re: Global Role-Play Team recruitment

Postby Maxington » Sun Sep 04, 2016 8:16 am

Is was summoned from my slumber. To whom must I please? I might not be able to be on much. I want to focus on academics. So I'm out for nomination. Thank you Reddy but no thank you.
"The future of the Nation is in the children's school bags" ~ Dr. Eric Williams
President of the Trond Henrichsen Institute for International Affairs.
User avatar
Maxington
 
Posts: 2733
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2013 11:37 pm
Location: Look Behind you.

Next

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests

cron